Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:01 pm
by GORDON
Because I said so.
And as it is My word, it is beyond contestation.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:08 pm
by TPRJones
Is "contestation" really a word?
I think you're making that up.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:11 pm
by GORDON
I may be making it up, but the logic loop means you can't argue about it.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:15 pm
by TPRJones
Oh, well then could you do me a personal favor and tell me I'll get laid this weekend? It's been too long.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:20 pm
by GORDON
Depends on how high your standards are.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:22 pm
by TPRJones
Standards? I left those behind years ago.
I do require that she be female and have a pulse.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:28 pm
by TheCatt
Hey, we tried to help you with that Asian chick.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:33 pm
by GORDON
AHA! He didn't specify species.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:55 pm
by TPRJones
Nah, that's negotiable at this point, depending on the amount of alchohol available.
As to Catt's reference, I just purchased a spy cam on eBay. I'm not saying there's any relation here, though, that would be wrong.
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:13 pm
by GORDON
So back on track, did anyone disagree with my statement of:
But here's the question I want answered: What kind of parent in their right mind thinks children should be given full, unrestricted use of the internet?
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2006 10:46 pm
by TPRJones
We were on-topic. I was giving a low-level demonstration.
But to give you a specific answer: a very good one or a very bad one, depending. If the kid's pretty bright and the parent has done a good job, then sending them out there on their own is a good learning experience and they are protected by their own self-worth and intelligence. But any regular kid out there like that is there because the parents are a) stupid, or b) negligent.
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:04 am
by TheCatt
So back on track, did anyone disagree with my statement of:
But here's the question I want answered: What kind of parent in their right mind thinks children should be given full, unrestricted use of the internet?
I've had unrestricted Internet access for 19 years.
Look what it did to me.
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:51 am
by Malcolm
So back on track, did anyone disagree with my statement of:
But here's the question I want answered: What kind of parent in their right mind thinks children should be given full, unrestricted use of the internet?
Parents who didn't fuck up raising their kids?