Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2004 2:00 pm
Your perrogative.TheCatt wrote:I disagree.
Your perrogative.TheCatt wrote:I disagree.
I do not believe Kerry would hesitate at all. Why do you believe he would?mbilderback wrote:TheCatt wrote:I disagree.
Your perrogative.
Hasn't he already claimed he would check what the rest of the world thought, first? I'm pretty sure you know the two words I'm thinking of. He said it right-chair on national tv. ("Right-chair" is how we ig'nant ohioans tawk)TheCatt wrote:mbilderback wrote:TheCatt wrote:I disagree.
Your perrogative.
I do not believe Kerry would hesitate at all. Why do you believe he would?
No, actually, he didn't.GORDON wrote:TheCatt wrote:mbilderback wrote:
Your perrogative.
I do not believe Kerry would hesitate at all. Why do you believe he would?
Hasn't he already claimed he would check what the rest of the world thought, first? I'm pretty sure you know the two words I'm thinking of. He said it right-chair on national tv. ("Right-chair" is how we ig'nant ohioans tawk)
If the UN is known for anything, it's expediency.
No president, through all of American history, has ever ceded -- and nor would I -- the right to preempt in any way necessary, to protect the United States of America. But if and when you do it, Jim, you've got to do it in a way that passes the, the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people, understand fully why you're doing what you're doing, and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons.
That may be true, but for the last week or so it seems you've been deparately trying to hold on to something (with Kerry) that just isn't there.TheCatt wrote:Here's the full quote.No president, through all of American history, has ever ceded -- and nor would I -- the right to preempt in any way necessary, to protect the United States of America. But if and when you do it, Jim, you've got to do it in a way that passes the, the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people, understand fully why you're doing what you're doing, and you can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons.
Seriously, you sometimes behave as though you only listen to Bush/his advisors, and have blinders on to the rest of the world.
Ooops.TheCatt wrote:I prefer a leader that's more intelligent than Bush.
the most infuriating revelation yet from the military records of the two presidential candidates: the young George W. Bush probably had a higher I.Q. than did the young John Kerry.
They are not formal I.Q. tests, but Mr. Sailer says they are similar enough to make reasonable extrapolations.
The commercial made its national debut on Thursday on the Fox News Channel, aimed directly at Mr. Bush's Republican base. It starts with a middle-aged man disgustedly dropping his Wall Street Journal on the kitchen table. "What kind of conservative runs half-trillion-a-year deficits? Gets us into an unwinnable war?" he asks his wife, but adds helplessly, "I can't vote for Kerry."
"Then don't," she says, cheerily suggesting an alternative who is not quite yet a household name: Michael Badnarik, a computer consultant from Austin, Tex.
That's better than W never working for it, right?GORDON wrote:Of course he is. he started working for the presidency in vietnam.
You're right, we should just give things to people who don't deserve them.GORDON wrote:Not really.