Page 2 of 11
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:39 pm
by GORDON
Oh yeah.
I guess Arnold is a fan of those.
BTW, I would like to see Leisher's plan put into effect.... though you know who the biggest opponents would be? Liberals. Which would actually be free advertising for the system...
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:45 pm
by Malcolm
Long as it's cheaper than a few hundred or thousand scanners.
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:43 pm
by Troy
GORDON wrote:Oh yeah.
I guess Arnold is a fan of those.
BTW, I would like to see Leisher's plan put into effect.... though you know who the biggest opponents would be? Liberals. Which would actually be free advertising for the system...
Sometimes, I wish you would make up your mind as to which party cares more about your personal freedoms.
It's always the other side when it's convenient for you to bitch about.
I swear it was those evil liberal socialists a a few threads ago trying to take them away.
Edited By Troy on 1265928265
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:41 pm
by GORDON
What?
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:50 pm
by thibodeaux
Troy wrote:Sometimes, I wish you would make up your mind as to which party cares more about your personal freedoms.
That's easy: none of them.
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:18 am
by TPRJones
Is there any law against taping small pieces of wire in the shape of letters and taping it to your chest before getting dressed to go onto a plane? Maybe something saying "Fuck the TSA", for example.
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:44 am
by Leisher
No, but I'm sure they'd come up with some excuse to detain you long enough to miss your flight, and then they'd blacklist you.
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:02 am
by GORDON
thibodeaux wrote:Troy wrote:Sometimes, I wish you would make up your mind as to which party cares more about your personal freedoms.
That's easy: none of them.
Is that what that mini-tirade was all about?
Absolutely none of them. No one in government can be trusted anymore. No one.
Fact remains, if Leisher's fake "terrorist blown up at checkpoint" video was released, it would be the liberals having a shit fit because a guy carrying explosives was detonated before he could be given due process. Am I wrong?
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:04 am
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:No, but I'm sure they'd come up with some excuse to detain you long enough to miss your flight, and then they'd blacklist you.
I remember a long time ago peeps getting pulled off planes because they had some sort of "Fuck the TSA" sign in their luggage to be found when it was searched. The luggage searchers, when not stealing things out of the bags, didn't like a plane passenger having an anti-TSA opinion, so they detained him.
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:11 pm
by GORDON
GORDON wrote:I'm calling it now: airports are only the beginning. Ultimately, if this trend continues, you won't be allowed to leave your house without a full body scan.
I FUCKING TOLD YOU.
http://blogs.forbes.com/andygre....ng-vans
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:20 pm
by Malcolm
You've got a ways to go before "not allowed" is fulfilled.
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 5:23 pm
by GORDON
Why is there always someone defending this shit...
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:39 am
by Leisher
If they're only using it in cases where some sort of crime is suspected, fine. Probable cause and all that.
However, if they're just randomly scanning, how is that not an illegal search?
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:32 am
by GORDON
Invent a foil-lined clothing line. Make billions.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:36 am
by TPRJones
how is that not an illegal search?
It is, IMO. Completely unconstitutional.
I'm sure they'll try to make some argument about how they are allowed to visually look at things like the car itself sitting on the street, and this is just the same thing with a different wavelength of light. It's bullshit, though.
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 9:37 am
by TPRJones
GORDON wrote:Invent a foil-lined clothing line. Make billions.
It'll match my hat.
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:05 pm
by TheCatt
Dont touch my junk.
TSA now molests passengers.
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:29 pm
by GORDON
Saw that video on 2 network news stations, today. Hopefully it'll make something happen.
Loved the "The only reason it isn't sexual assault is because you're the government" line.
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:35 pm
by GORDON
Is there any way a "private charter" company could open its doors selling a product that doesn't require TSA involvement at a slightly increased price?
Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:49 pm
by TheCatt
I doubt it. But I'm so sick of the TSA now, that I never want to fly again.