Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:49 am
by Malcolm
Bloody fucking hell.
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:25 pm
by GORDON
Enquirer say they have enough evidence to sink his campaign.
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusi....rer.php
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:41 pm
by Malcolm
Right now, they got this.
The National Enquirer says a lot of shit. In fact, that's about all they do. Why in the hell would a paper like this be shy about printing controversial stories? Why are they threatening to release this shit instead of actually releasing it? For a paper that normally runs stories of alien hybrid children, what in the fuck is so exotic about this story that they even gotta blink an eye before running it?
If they actually print proof & it can be verified, I'll retract my venom in this particular case.
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:34 pm
by TheCatt
*unpinned*
Posted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:50 pm
by GORDON
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 4:41 pm
by Malcolm
Did they actually go thru & publish the photos months ago?
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:20 pm
by TheCatt
Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 12:22 pm
by TheCatt
But in the summer of 2009, the National Enquirer published reports that Edwards had taken a paternity test, and the results confirmed he was the father.
National Enquirer 2
Malcolm 0
Edited By TheCatt on 1264094582
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:42 am
by Vince
The editor (or someone) from the Enquirer said they're going to put in for a Pulitzer. Can't say I blame them. They should ge it if only to embarrass the other media.