Today in Sexism

Post by **GORDON** » Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:20 am

Lots of mixed messages out there. The next girl said "I was scared to say no and then I was raped."

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:01 am

GORDON wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:20 am Lots of mixed messages out there. The next girl said "I was scared to say no and then I was raped."

Right?

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Oct 26, 2023 6:08 pm

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 9:17 am

Post by **Leisher** » Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:58 pm

I see videos like this daily. I've seen countless women proclaim what a man needs to make, look like, and how he has to act to get her (Things like the 666 rule.) and not a single one can answer the follow up question that this guy asks.

They all think they're unicorns.

Post by **GORDON** » Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:05 pm

She doesn't know what to do. She's hungry and craving her nuggies, but has a camera in her face and feels obligated to dance for it.

Slay, queen.

Post by **TheCatt** » Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:38 pm

"I need $250k/year, and McDonalds" What?

Post by **Leisher** » Tue Nov 14, 2023 3:55 pm

I love how women think their body is worth a 6'+ tall guy, who is not obese, doesn't cheat, makes 6 figures, has a giant cock, and worships the ground they walk on, but they can't sell their OF for $5/month.

Post by **Leisher** » Mon Dec 11, 2023 1:13 pm

Today in absolute non-stories that the MSM tries to push into being something...

USWNT got more abuse than any other team during the last WWC.

The hell you say?! An American team of women who are woke af and loud about it, who also happened to be demanding as much as the men get paid at the time of the WWC (while failing to get the same ratings and attendance), got trash talked about and to them online?

I'm so shocked I might faint!

Two unidentified players -- who FIFA has chosen not to name in order to protect the individuals from further abuse -- representing the U.S. and Argentina received significantly more abusive messages than any other players at the tournament.

If the American isn't Megan Rapinoe, I'd actually be shocked.

Post by **Leisher** » Tue Dec 12, 2023 9:25 pm

"It's a man's world."

Punter dropped from rape lawsuit after his career and reputation have already been ruined.

Post by **TheCatt** » Tue Dec 12, 2023 9:29 pm

Leisher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 9:25 pm "It's a man's world."

Punter dropped from rape lawsuit after his career and reputation have already been ruined.

Was the punter's name Bill Belichick?

Post by **Leisher** » Wed Dec 13, 2023 9:37 am

TheCatt wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 9:29 pm
Leisher wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 9:25 pm "It's a man's world."

Punter dropped from rape lawsuit after his career and reputation have already been ruined.
Was the punter's name Bill Belichick?

I have the worst habit of going way too fast with my CTRL+C.

Post by **Leisher** » Sat Dec 16, 2023 4:24 pm

Afghan women had freedom, now they're committing suicide.

I really hope woke white women here read this article.

Post by **Leisher** » Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:40 am

This is not the first time I've seen women use this term despite being unable to define it. Modern feminism is creating an army of brainless drones vomiting buzzwords and hate. There are going to be a whole lot of lonely 40 year old women who missed out on having a family and kids.

Post by **Leisher** » Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:50 pm

Nature will always win.

This dude is a savage, but is he wrong?

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Dec 21, 2023 7:24 am

Sex workers can be smart. And there can be a large difference between a $30/hour whore and a $1500/hour "escort"

Is he also going to say that men are just in their physical/labor jobs cuz of things they didn't earn? Testosterone and such?

This is dumb.

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Dec 21, 2023 11:17 am

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 7:24 am Sex workers can be smart. And there can be a large difference between a $30/hour whore and a $1500/hour "escort"

Is he also going to say that men are just in their physical/labor jobs cuz of things they didn't earn? Testosterone and such?

This is dumb.

Let's not discuss exceptions to the rule as if they are the rule.

Of the countless women that have made porn, there was only one Jenna Jameson. I would argue Sasha Gray is another who turned her porn career into something more. (She's a very popular streamer now and does nothing sexual.) I might have missed someone else, but the vast, vast majority of porn stars have nothing to show for it aside from memories and someone recognizing them in the grocery store.

OnlyFans has turned being a whore into a easy paycheck for some women. They don't have to get that 9 to 5, travel, do glamourous things, get rich, etc. However, that's a super low percentage. They are the exception and not all of them are smart. Some are just lucky or have smart people running things for them. If you think sex trafficking isn't present on OF, then you're delulu. It's been proven that a lot of OF (and other services) accounts are linked to sex trafficking.

Hell, even their pimp, OnlyFans, is more lucky than smart. They wanted to get out of the sex business and then learned sex is the only reason they exist, so they backtracked. Meanwhile, modern feminism tells women it's empowering to sell your body to incels because YOU control it and yada yada yada. Proving yet again that modern feminism is pushed by lesbians and lonely, miserable women who wasted their youth and beauty and want to take it out on other women.

Back to how the successful ones are the exception... The top 1% of OF models earn 33% of all the revenue. The average is around $150/month. For every millionaire OF has created, there are a thousand other women who exposed everything and didn't earn shit.

Turns out that not every woman is a Paige Sporanic (who apparently doesn't even do nudity on her OF?). Not every woman is a fading star who decided to cash in one last time on their beauty, ala Denise Richards.

Now how many porn stars do you know who have been openly accepted into society normally after their career? Sure, some of them become a SAHM, find a career that allows them to hide, or were in the industry for such a short amount of time that nobody remembers them. However, we've seen the stories of former porn stars who were teachers or something and once they were found out, it destroyed them. The religious right condemns them for their past, while the tolerant left supports their right to do have a career post porn, just not in their neighborhood. Meanwhile, men don't want them as we see with former porn stars, who are quite attractive (not all are) complaining that men don't see them as desirable, trophies, or wife material just because of their past. (Riley Reed has complained about this recently, as has Lana Rhoades.)

Point being, most of the women who open an OF account make nothing. Another good percentage make enough to put off having a job in the short term, but will eventually have to get a real job. A truly super small amount of them make life changing money.

However, ALL of them now have their pictures and videos out there for the world to see for $1. Free if their subscribers share them, and they do. So they get all the shame that comes with exposing yourself for 1/100000 of a BitCoin. Their kids' friends can watch them masturbate for a schilling. Their husbands probably take great pride when their golf league friends discuss using pocket change to watch their wife have a train run on them.

So give yourself a lifetime of shame, regret, and make yourself less attractive as a spouse for the very unlikely chance that you'll be able to cash in on your looks and body now even though porn is FREE.

Very, very smart.

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Dec 21, 2023 12:59 pm

Yeah, I just don't care about shame. If some people want to act like that (be all shamey), then that's their problem, not mine. Feels very puritanical.

Exceptions or not, there are plenty of dumb people all around. If they're hot + female, they may as well be naked.

Post by **Leisher** » Thu Dec 21, 2023 2:18 pm

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 12:59 pm Yeah, I just don't care about shame. If some people want to act like that (be all shamey), then that's their problem, not mine. Feels very puritanical.

We have covered this, and we are of the same mind. In our advanced age we have gained enough wisdom to know the past is the past and we're not starting new families with these women, so nudes or sex scenes getting out won't harm us socially.

However, we are not society. They're all uptight about this stuff, and thus, it is a true concern. Also, as we discussed previously, our younger selves looking to start a family would be more concerned about someone's past.

So it matters.

TheCatt wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 12:59 pm If they're hot + female, they may as well be naked.

No objection.

Post by **TheCatt** » Thu Dec 21, 2023 2:56 pm

Leisher wrote: ↑Thu Dec 21, 2023 2:18 pm However, we are not society. They're all uptight about this stuff, and thus, it is a true concern. Also, as we discussed previously, our younger selves looking to start a family would be more concerned about someone's past.

i feel like society is going the right direction on this, overall.

I'm trying to think what single me would think. For the most part, I wouldn't care as long as she wasn't getting banged for $$. There's my line.