From here.
In an op-ed today at the Wall Street Journal, Pamela Anderson and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach decry what they describe as pornography’s “corrosive effects” on a “man’s soul,” and, as a result, porn’s negative impact on fatherhood and the institution of the family.
You are both retarded.
[Anthony] Weiner, they argue, typifies a certain kind of successful American man: one so deeply unfilled that he is willing to self-destruct over a few cheap thrills.
Yes, because no other demographic in any other country at any point in time except the modern American man has ever made stupid decisions for pussy. I'm especially blown away that a rabbi can say that with a straight face.
How many families will suffer? How many marriages will implode? How many talented men will scrap their most important relationships and careers for a brief onanistic thrill? How many children will propel, warp-speed, into the dark side of adult sexuality by forced exposure to their fathers’ profanations?
Oh my fucking god. Are you shitting me? Are you writing a plot treatment for a Lifetime movie? Fortunately, the article's author takes the time to destroy their logic so I don't have to.
Anderson and Boteach call for a “sensual revolution” in which “orgasmic release” is done within “binding relationships.” Porn, in this framing, has no room apparently in long-term relationships or marriage
They conclude, “porn is for losers,” and reiterate that “healthy sexuality,” and porn consumption are inherently at odds.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."