Mr. Glasnost

Comment threads from front page posts.
Post Reply
71-1085092892

Post by 71-1085092892 »

From here.



Edited By GORDON on 1088124291
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

Image
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

I figured this was a more accurate representation of what Gorby said.
Image
User avatar
unkbill
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 8:19 pm

Post by unkbill »

I thought he was right on. We all lost the cold war because we wasted alot of money and noone dominated another.
In marriage there is always one person right. And the other one is the husband.
71-1085092892

Post by 71-1085092892 »

unkbill wrote:I thought he was right on. We all lost the cold war because we wasted alot of money and noone dominated another.
Unless you count that one of the competitors... you know... ceased to exist.
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

Aye, even I'll say capitalism beat the commies. Expensive as all hell, but a victory nonetheless.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Vince
Posts: 8619
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Post by Vince »

I guess in reality, everyone in a war "loses". The winner is the one that loses the least. And as Gordo said, since they ceased to exist and we're still here... W1NN3r!
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
User avatar
Cakedaddy
Posts: 8860
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 6:52 pm

Post by Cakedaddy »

When it comes to war, the only winning move is . . . not to play.
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by TPRJones »

We won the cold war. Not because the commies are gone, but because we got a huge technological boost from having "fought" it.

Cost us? Hell, the cost of building some nukes is nothing comapred to how nicely it pushed our economy into a seriously tech-based footing over the years. I attribute a fair amount of our recent economic troubles to the eventual impact of not having a strong national "enemy" to compete against anymore.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Paul
Posts: 8458
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 5:02 pm
Location: KY
Contact:

Post by Paul »

This is a little off topic, but your comment reminded me of something I saw on TV the other day.

During the race to get to the moon, the Soviet Union had the advantage of larger space pods, because their technology was worse.

See, the U.S. was able to compact the size of their nukes. Since our warheads could be small we developed small rockets for our ICMB's.

The Soviets couldn't shrink their nukes so they had to develop much larger rockets to carry the larger payload.
71-1085092892

Post by 71-1085092892 »

Interesting.
Post Reply