Elon Musk

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Fri Jun 04, 2021 11:13 am To be fair, Trump has never tweeted anything this intelligent.
lol
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Someone has to fight the good fight.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54396
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by GORDON »

Jeff Bezos: Enemy of Mankind
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

Musk pledges to sell $6B in stocks to solve world hunger IF the UN can prove it will solve world hunger.

I genuinely respect this move. Particularly the stipulation that they use "open accounting" so the general public can see exactly where the money would go.

However, it should be noted that a redditor says this is NOT what the WFP chief said and it was a bullshit CNN headline that caused the whole controversy here:
CNN is the guilty party. The headline is an outright lie.

Here's the original tweet:

Here's the article it cites: https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/26/economy/ ... index.html

The quoted headline is:

2% of Elon Musk's wealth could solve world hunger, says director of UN food scarcity organization

The article says:

A small group of ultra-wealthy individuals could help solve world hunger with just a fraction of their net worth, says the director of the United Nations' World Food Programme. ... "$6 billion to help 42 million people that are literally going to die if we don't reach them. It's not complicated," he added.

The asshole headline writer turned this into a lie by deleting "help". The UN WFP director never said $6 billion would "solve world hunger". He asked for $6 billion to help save 42 million people.



ADDENDUM: Here's what the UN WFP chief originally said:

42 million people are on famine’s edge this year. An unprecedented global crisis spiked by Covid. Starvation, destabilization of nations & mass migration if we do not respond. @elonmusk, you made $6 billion just yesterday—the exact $ we need to avert catastrophe! Please help!

That's what he's saying: he's asking for $6 billion to avert a catastrophe that will starve 42 million people.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

Just changed his Twitter name to "Lorde Edge".

He also posted a poll saying he would sell 10% of his Tesla shares if Twitter voted that he should. They did, but MSNBC claims that was happening anyway because he owes $15B in taxes.

$15B for $28B in earnings? What tax rate is he paying? How can someone have a $15B and then be labeled as "not paying their fair share"? (That's not defending him, but a legit question.)
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:51 am $15B for $28B in earnings? What tax rate is he paying? How can someone have a $15B and then be labeled as "not paying their fair share"? (That's not defending him, but a legit question.)
Because he's made over $300Bn.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:02 am
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:51 am $15B for $28B in earnings? What tax rate is he paying? How can someone have a $15B and then be labeled as "not paying their fair share"? (That's not defending him, but a legit question.)
Because he's made over $300Bn.
Ok, but how much has he paid in taxes? He's never paid anything until this upcoming bill? Are you saying that $15B is on the $300B and not the $28B? Has all that money actually been realized or are we talking about value of money not yet cashed in?
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54396
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by GORDON »

He must get a lot of extra votes for paying $15B.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:47 am
TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:02 am
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:51 am $15B for $28B in earnings? What tax rate is he paying? How can someone have a $15B and then be labeled as "not paying their fair share"? (That's not defending him, but a legit question.)
Because he's made over $300Bn.
Ok, but how much has he paid in taxes? He's never paid anything until this upcoming bill? Are you saying that $15B is on the $300B and not the $28B? Has all that money actually been realized or are we talking about value of money not yet cashed in?
A lot of his gains of the $300B are unrealized, and therefore untaxed. These have to be taxed because they were option grants that he has to realize, or lose.

It was debatable as to whether unrealized gains are taxable, but SCOTUS decided in 1920 (Eisner v. Macomber), a 5-4 decision, iirc, that unrealized income could not be taxable as income. Such a large distinction, based on just one vote.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:55 am
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:47 am
TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:02 am Because he's made over $300Bn.
Ok, but how much has he paid in taxes? He's never paid anything until this upcoming bill? Are you saying that $15B is on the $300B and not the $28B? Has all that money actually been realized or are we talking about value of money not yet cashed in?
A lot of his gains of the $300B are unrealized, and therefore untaxed. These have to be taxed because they were option grants that he has to realize, or lose.

It was debatable as to whether unrealized gains are taxable, but SCOTUS decided in 1920 (Eisner v. Macomber), a 5-4 decision, iirc, that unrealized income could not be taxable as income. Such a large distinction, based on just one vote.
So technically, he has not made over $300B.

What happens when someone gets taxed on their unrealized gains, and then those gains tank almost immediately? Does the government give that person a refund?

A typical average worker in their early 60s might be a multimillionaire based on their portfolio. Are we saying the government should be taxing that money annually instead of when its realized?
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:47 pm So technically, he has not made over $300B.
No, he absolutely has made that much. It's just not realized income, but unrealized.
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:47 pm What happens when someone gets taxed on their unrealized gains, and then those gains tank almost immediately? Does the government give that person a refund?
Part of the reason people continue to argue against it.
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 12:47 pm A typical average worker in their early 60s might be a multimillionaire based on their portfolio. Are we saying the government should be taxing that money annually instead of when its realized?
No one appears to be saying that, since most billionaire taxes are for the billionaires.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:02 pm No, he absolutely has made that much. It's just not realized income, but unrealized.
One of the reasons I struggle with financial stuff is because this makes zero sense to me. Sure, on paper he made that much, but until he has it in his possession, he didn't.

Remember, the Gamestop president (or whatever) was a billionaire on paper recently, but was unable to cash in (possibly by law?). Should he get taxed for that money he made, but cannot touch? If not, why not. He "made it".
TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:02 pm Part of the reason people continue to argue against it.
And I think they're right. Seems to me, the correct way to go would be to punish these billionaires in their loans and loopholes they use to pay their bills?
TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 1:02 pm No one appears to be saying that, since most billionaire taxes are for the billionaires.
Yeah, they're never saying that...until they are. Do you really think that if this were to work on billionaires that it wouldn't eventually work its way down? Our government has never seen its citizens earn a penny that they didn't want to take.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:59 pm One of the reasons I struggle with financial stuff is because this makes zero sense to me. Sure, on paper he made that much, but until he has it in his possession, he didn't.
It may be paper, but he can use those paper assets to do a lot. He can get a $100B loan against those assets at 1-2%, and fund a crazy lifestyle if he wants, all with no income. Heck, he could have qualified for pandemic assistance.
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 2:59 pm And I think they're right. Seems to me, the correct way to go would be to punish these billionaires in their loans and loopholes they use to pay their bills?
So... how? a loan tax?

Again, I don't support an unrealized income tax, but I do support removing step-up basis in assets on death.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

He has to pay off the loan at some point, yes? Where does he get that money from?
TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:02 pm removing step-up basis in assets on death
I'm not a fan of death taxes.
1. I don't think the government should have a right to your fortune just because you died.
2. It actually incentivizes the government to want you dead. A government that wants total control of health care. :D
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54396
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by GORDON »

Death tax is taxing money that was already taxed.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:18 pm He has to pay off the loan at some point, yes? Where does he get that money from?
TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 3:02 pm removing step-up basis in assets on death
I'm not a fan of death taxes.
1. I don't think the government should have a right to your fortune just because you died.
2. It actually incentivizes the government to want you dead. A government that wants total control of health care. :D
But if you give someone that money before you die, there is no step up basis, and the government taxes it when sold. Why the different treatment just for dying?
GORDON wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 4:53 pm Death tax is taxing money that was already taxed.
typically not, see above.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65250
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Elon Musk

Post by Leisher »

TheCatt wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 5:44 pm But if you give someone that money before you die, there is no step up basis, and the government taxes it when sold. Why the different treatment just for dying?
You lost me.

I'm not talking about a dime you give away while alive. I'm saying that once you die, there should be no taxes on whatever property/money/etc. that gets distributed based upon your will. You earned it, you paid taxes on it already, and it should be yours to give away. It will get taxed again eventually and shouldn't get taxed just for transfer of ownership due to death.

Now I should stipulate that I'm fine with interest/earnings that have not been taxed yet being taxed once realized.

So let's say I die and my will says my oldest gets everything. (These are going to all be made up numbers, FYI.)
-I have a savings account with $1.5M in it, of which, $1.3M was already taxed when I earned it.
-I have $800K in stocks.
-I have a Roth IRA worth $1.1M.
-I have other stocks worth $500K.

Initially, all of these things transfer to her name. She should be taxed for the interest earned on the savings account, but not a dime more there. She should be taxed on all the stocks once she cashes them in. The Roth IRA she should not be taxed on, ever.

Maybe this is how they do it now? I don't know.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53716
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Elon Musk

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:24 pm I'm not talking about a dime you give away while alive. I'm saying that once you die, there should be no taxes on whatever property/money/etc. that gets distributed based upon your will. You earned it, you paid taxes on it already, and it should be yours to give away. It will get taxed again eventually and shouldn't get taxed just for transfer of ownership due to death.
You buy a stock for $1. It becomes worth $11 million. You die. It does not get taxed. Your person inherits it for the full $11 million. They sell it for $10,999,999.00 in gains. No taxes are owed, as the basis of that stock (formerly $1), becomes $11 Million when you die. Magic! no taxes! BUT, if you had given that stock to someone before you died, and they sold it, they would owe capital gains tax on the $10,999,999.00 gain.
Leisher wrote: Mon Nov 08, 2021 8:24 pm So let's say I die and my will says my oldest gets everything. (These are going to all be made up numbers, FYI.)
-I have a savings account with $1.5M in it, of which, $1.3M was already taxed when I earned it.
-I have $800K in stocks.
-I have a Roth IRA worth $1.1M.
-I have other stocks worth $500K.
No taxes at all, as the inheritance/lifetime exclusion is currently $11.7 million per person dying. Even if you paid $100k for those $800k in stocks, no taxes on the $700k gains. That's the "step up" basis that I think should be removed from inheritances.

I'm not really sure how you would have 1.5M in a savings account, with only $1.3M having been taxed before. That would be infinitely more likely with stocks.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Post Reply