Their deaths are on a different order of magnitude. Most people would call that effective.
If you want extreme gun control, look at New Zealand: 0.24 vs 4.90 for US.
Their deaths are on a different order of magnitude. Most people would call that effective.
Without context of everything else about their society, it's meaningless. The only people that would call it effective are those who are anti-gun. Ask Chicago.
Shit, even the sober drivers suck... I just drove I-95 to FL and back.
According to folks like Pete Buttigieg that is the ultimate goal. The flaw in their logic continues to be that the only people who adhere to gun laws are law-abiding citizens.
I encounter the same thing driving to and returning from Cleveland on the weekends.
I mean, there are other options for fucking...
Counterpoint: New Zealand.
True. But I find the middle lane parkers are much more prevalent. And you end up with this weird situation where the fast cars zip around the right lanes to get through.
That's quite a broad counterpoint. Try explaining in more detail. What exactly is "New Zealand" a counter point to in my statement about Pete Buttigieg?
You said the flaw was gun-law adherence. If you get rid of the guns, adherence doesn't matter. They are gone. NZ has gotten rid of a lot of guns.
In the article I pulled up, NZ officials believe 170,000 "legal until the latest legislation" guns are still out there. (Not counting the ones still legal.) That is a whole lot of guns that have never and will never be used in a crime, but their politicians are making those gun owners into criminals by treating all NZers like criminals.
If you were being serious I'd have you committed...if asylums still existed...
"well-regulated milita"