I'd argue a little, but I wouldn't bet more than a dollar.
I remember seeing a home-made statue of Robert E. Lee in front of a shack in SC, once.
I'd argue a little, but I wouldn't bet more than a dollar.
I was googling worst case maps (I'll be beachfront!), and found this:
"You should talk about these atrocities that have happened in history, but you also do have an obligation to point out the value that each individual brings to the table," Fowler Arthur said.
...
"Maybe you're listening to it from the perspective of a Jewish person that has gone through the tragedies that took place," Fowler Arthur continued. "And maybe you listen to it from the perspective of a German soldier."
No, there is no debate about the morality of the event, but there certainly MUST be discussion. I think it's extremely dangerous to just label Germans as "evil" and call it a day. We should explain how Hitler and the Nazi party were able to take over Germany with words. Not all soldiers in the German army were Nazis. We need students to see how blaming a select group of people for the entire country's problems led to mass murder(Nazis blamed Jews for losing WWI and the state of the economy.). You're not going to prevent a second Holocaust by simply saying "This was bad and should never happen again". You need to show how a society got to a point where it made sense."There are moments in our history where there are not two sides to debate," said James Pasch, regional director of the Anti-Defamation League. "There is a right side and a wrong side."
"In the case of the Holocaust, we're talking about state-sponsored mass murder," Dahlia Fisher with the Maltz Museum, said.