My James Bond always goes after women. He doesn't go after guys. That's not me being a homophobe, that's just me explaining how I expect my James Bond to behave.
I can imagine a situation where I'd be willing to accept it. It'd have to be part of some situation where it's the best and only way to get the information he needs to save the Queen (the royal one, not a gay one), and not in some cheesily scripted way but something well written.
But just a little seduction, no actual penetration of any orifices, and preferably not even any kissing. And then he'd have to kill the guy once he got what he needed and immediately have wild sex with the movie's Bond girl.
I still wouldn't like it, but I'd accept it under those conditions.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Ever since this Daniel Craig homo came out of the closet as a gun-hating pussy, I haven't been that interested in seeing his movie. Now I'm even more not interested.
TPRJones wrote:I can imagine a situation where I'd be willing to accept it. It'd have to be part of some situation where it's the best and only way to get the information he needs to save the Queen (the royal one, not a gay one), and not in some cheesily scripted way but something well written.
But just a little seduction, no actual penetration of any orifices, and preferably not even any kissing. And then he'd have to kill the guy once he got what he needed and immediately have wild sex with the movie's Bond girl.
I still wouldn't like it, but I'd accept it under those conditions.
You're becoming my new favorite...
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
TPRJones wrote:I can imagine a situation where I'd be willing to accept it. It'd have to be part of some situation where it's the best and only way to get the information he needs to save the Queen (the royal one, not a gay one), and not in some cheesily scripted way but something well written.
But just a little seduction, no actual penetration of any orifices, and preferably not even any kissing. And then he'd have to kill the guy once he got what he needed and immediately have wild sex with the movie's Bond girl.
I still wouldn't like it, but I'd accept it under those conditions.
You're becoming my new favorite...
Careful, TPR.
It's all wine, dancing, and sweet words at first.
The he kills you without any penetration and sleeps with your cute neighbor.
TPRJones wrote:I can imagine a situation where I'd be willing to accept it. It'd have to be part of some situation where it's the best and only way to get the information he needs to save the Queen (the royal one, not a gay one), and not in some cheesily scripted way but something well written.
But just a little seduction, no actual penetration of any orifices, and preferably not even any kissing. And then he'd have to kill the guy once he got what he needed and immediately have wild sex with the movie's Bond girl.
I still wouldn't like it, but I'd accept it under those conditions.
You're becoming my new favorite...
Careful, TPR.
It's all wine, dancing, and sweet words at first.
The he kills you without any penetration and sleeps with your cute neighbor.
God, some people never forget nuthin'.
I'm sober now for chistsakes
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
TPRJones wrote:I find it interesting that his primary complaint seems to be that his neighbor received penetration while he was, sadly, denied such activities.
While such actions corroded my soul, the killing pretty much ruined it for me first.