Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:18 pm
by GORDON
From here.
And btw, that MSNBC headline "Afghan Leader Blasts U.S.?" Sounds bad, doesn't it. Here's the actual quote from the article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13473386/
KABUL, Afghanistan - Afghan President Hamid Karzai urged the international community to reassess its approach to the war on terror Thursday, saying the deaths of hundreds of Afghans in fighting with U.S.-led forces was “not acceptable.”
Wow, quite the blast.
Edited By GORDON on 1163368435
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 12:28 pm
by thibodeaux
I'm pretty sure headline writers are all on crack.
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:07 pm
by Leisher
Will anyone on the left acknowledge WMDs have been found in Iraq?
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:51 pm
by TheCatt
I won't until someone on the right does. Rummy himself said no WMD found.
Of course, most of those weapons were buried by Iraqi troops during their eight-year war with Iran — which ended in 1988 — and were long forgotten.
The military announced in 2004 that several crates of the old shells containing a blister agent that was no longer active had been discovered, but the military, White House and CIA didn't consider the shells evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, the Post reported. Wednesday night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were not the suspected WMDs sought in the 2003 invasion of Iraq and were, for the most part, not in useable condition.
(emphasis mine)
Oh look, no one thinks we have, cept people who read/watch Fox News. Damn that biased MSM.
Edited By TheCatt on 1151002331
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:06 pm
by unkbill
I won't until someone on the right does. Rummy himself said no WMD found.
Of course, most of those weapons were buried by Iraqi troops during their eight-year war with Iran — which ended in 1988 — and were long forgotten.
The military announced in 2004 that several crates of the old shells containing a blister agent that was no longer active had been discovered, but the military, White House and CIA didn't consider the shells evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, the Post reported. Wednesday night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were not the suspected WMDs sought in the 2003 invasion of Iraq and were, for the most part, not in useable condition.
(emphasis mine)
Oh look, no one thinks we have, cept people who read/watch Fox News. Damn that biased MSM.
Cheese and Rice. When you going to learn brother. You got balls the size of Grapefruit but you ain't never going to get this crowd to believe your hoedown shit.
Edited By unkbill on 1151028449
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:21 pm
by GORDON
Simmer down now.
I made the post before all of the pre-1991 stuff was revealed. Doesn't make it any less illegal, but, indeed, "these aren't the WMD's you're looking for."
Now, the next time you claim I never admit to beng mistaken, Unk, I get to slap your stubbly face.
Posted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 9:36 pm
by Alhazad
Not NELLY, Nelly Furtado. Big (adorable) difference.
For comparison,
Nelly:
Nelly Furtado:
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:28 pm
by Oooooooo
Congratulations!
You proved that there is bias in the media and that Fox News is way out of sync with any other media outlet.
Got any more dead horses to beat?
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:44 pm
by thibodeaux
Congratulations!
You proved that there is bias in the media and that Fox News is way out of sync with any other media outlet.
Got any more dead horses to beat?
Psycho.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:44 pm
by GORDON
Homeboy is posting from/through Germany, too.
Wild.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:48 am
by Malcolm
These fucking bots are becoming annoying.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:23 am
by TheCatt
There are no fucking bots. There have never been any fucking bots.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 5:00 pm
by GORDON
Considering requiring registration for these feedback threads... which has never happened before.
Thoughts?
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:31 pm
by TheCatt
Guess there's no "enter these letters to prove you are human" stuff for ikonboard?
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:35 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote:Guess there's no "enter these letters to prove you are human" stuff for ikonboard?
Hmm.
I can look into that.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:51 pm
by TheCatt
I've been trying for about 45 minutes today. I've only found other people who decided to require registration as well
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:49 pm
by Leisher
We're getting hit daily with spam versus how many guest posters with legit statements and not just politically biased bullshit that they never back up with fact, nor show back up to defend?
Make 'em register, just add an explanation why.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 7:57 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote:I've been trying for about 45 minutes today. I've only found other people who decided to require registration as well
I assume you went to the ib user forums... did you look in the "hacks" sections? That's where I figured I'd find that functionality. Some user add-on "hack."
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 8:44 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote:TheCatt wrote:I've been trying for about 45 minutes today. I've only found other people who decided to require registration as well
I assume you went to the ib user forums... did you look in the "hacks" sections? That's where I figured I'd find that functionality. Some user add-on "hack."
Yeah, I looked through two different places that had tons of hacks. Nothing that looked like it to me.
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 8:53 pm
by GORDON
Dammit.
Hey Thib, write it for us.