Democrats in NJ trying to ignore voter fraud.

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
Post Reply
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54579
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post....WUyMjQ=
On about 2,300 of those applications so far, the signature on the request form does not match the signature on the voter’s registration forms with the state.

In a development that is depressingly predictable, the New Jersey Democratic party is asking the state to provide provisional ballots for all these voters. Those ballots could, presumably, be used to overcome any narrow lead by Republican Chris Christie over Democrat Jon Corzine on Election Day.

...

Could some of these cases be an election official misjudging the natural deviation in two handwriting samples from the same person? Certainly, and that's why the current system has clerks reaching out to rejected voters (presuming they actually exist) to sort out the discrepancy. But Democrats want to short-circuit the established methods of sorting out the problem, and in fact to ban rejections based on signature mismatches entirely.


Whatever it takes to win, I suppose. Wouldn't want the other, evil party to win.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Post Reply