Stealing HTML
-
- Posts: 8062
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm
We were talking about this at work. I got annoyed because some rube put a javascript right-button-click handler in his web page so that people can't steal his images and markup. That led to the question: is markup protectable IP?
Take the DTMan front page, for instance. Sure, Gordon's paranoid ravings are copyrightable, but what about the "look and feel" of the page?
I suspect that since Amazon can patent the hyperlink or whatever, that some idiot court would enforce it, but what do I know.
Take the DTMan front page, for instance. Sure, Gordon's paranoid ravings are copyrightable, but what about the "look and feel" of the page?
I suspect that since Amazon can patent the hyperlink or whatever, that some idiot court would enforce it, but what do I know.
We had something like this conversation back when Dharma or whatever his name was pretty much completely copied the then-look of the DTMan main page for his "how sad is that" webpage where he could bash.... well, everyone who wasn't him. I called him on it, he said it was a parody, I said it is only a parody when people know what page you are making a parody of, and no one knew dtman.com.... therefor it was plagiarism.
His was almost exactly duplicating the style, though.... if someone patents a "webpage divided into sections/tables with a main section for content and a smaller table for indexing similar links, with a header at the top" then we're all suable. Sue-able. Whatever.
His was almost exactly duplicating the style, though.... if someone patents a "webpage divided into sections/tables with a main section for content and a smaller table for indexing similar links, with a header at the top" then we're all suable. Sue-able. Whatever.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
It can be a pain when you're surfing for barnyard porn and the page is right-click disabled and you need to screen capure the entire page and then crop down the pic you want to save for later.TPRJones wrote:I don't get those blocks, they aren't very effective anyway. Just a quick View->Source and you can easily take whatever you want.
I've heard.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
With View->Source you can get the direct link to the picture you want to keep and download it directly that way. Much easier. Just do a find in the source for a chunk of text near the picture and it should be easy to find.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
-
- Posts: 8062
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm
I actually emailed the rube at the time and told him exactly that. His reply: OMG ONOEZ!!! Can you tell me how to disable View -> Source???TPRJones wrote:I don't get those blocks, they aren't very effective anyway. Just a quick View->Source and you can easily take whatever you want.
Clearly lots of people have no clue how http works.
Yes, it is illegal. Copyright law covers source code, and markup would be considered code, since it instructs a computer to do something.
That being said, without registration, punishment would be of a "cease and desist" nature. However, if someone registered the copyright of their code, and someone were to violate it, statutory damages of $750-$30,000 per work can be claimed.
Copyrights last 70 years plus the life of the author/creator.
That being said, I think HTML theft would be difficult to prove due to independent creation defense.
That being said, without registration, punishment would be of a "cease and desist" nature. However, if someone registered the copyright of their code, and someone were to violate it, statutory damages of $750-$30,000 per work can be claimed.
Copyrights last 70 years plus the life of the author/creator.
That being said, I think HTML theft would be difficult to prove due to independent creation defense.
It's not me, it's someone else.
My high school's website tried to intercept all right clicks, too. Course, they were all pretty much idiots.thibodeaux wrote:I actually emailed the rube at the time and told him exactly that. His reply: OMG ONOEZ!!! Can you tell me how to disable View -> Source???TPRJones wrote:I don't get those blocks, they aren't very effective anyway. Just a quick View->Source and you can easily take whatever you want.
Clearly lots of people have no clue how http works.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Code I could understand. The SHA-1 hash algorithm probably has such protection. But the HTML on a site? I'm less likely to believe that.TheCatt wrote:Yes, it is illegal. Copyright law covers source code, and markup would be considered code, since it instructs a computer to do something.
That being said, without registration, punishment would be of a "cease and desist" nature. However, if someone registered the copyright of their code, and someone were to violate it, statutory damages of $750-$30,000 per work can be claimed.
Copyrights last 70 years plus the life of the author/creator.
That being said, I think HTML theft would be difficult to prove due to independent creation defense.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."