Welcome to Thunderdome

Robert De Niro and (surprise, surprise) a Kennedy are functionally fucking we-todd-did.

“On one hand, the government is telling pregnant women which mercury-laced fish to avoid so that they don’t harm their fetuses, and on the other, the CDC supports injecting mercury-containing vaccines into pregnant women, infants and children,” Kennedy said at a joint press conference Wednesday.

“This defies all logic and common sense.”

No, it belies your complete and total disregard for chemistry. But thanks for playing, dickweeds.

Kennedy also said recently that Dipshit Drumpf still wants him to chair a commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity, which was proposed in early January when he met with the then-Dipshit Elect at Drumpf Tower.

De Niro has really been making an ass of himself lately.

Hollywood screenwriter in trouble for using N-word during vaccine argument.

N-word=anti-vax?

Whatever gets you shunned.

Thanks, fucktards. Well done.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... 1a526d1655

Cakedaddy wrote: Thanks, fucktards. Well done.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... 1a526d1655

Remember when we had measles eliminated? Man, those were the days.

Here's rootin' for Polio and Mumps! Let's go old school!

Amazon now being targeted as a source of misinformation on vaccines.

A conspiracy theorist could make a connection between shutting down anti-vax stuff and efforts to curb free speech. There's a political thriller script in there somewhere.

Here's a great tactic by anti-vaxers that's sure to win them lots of support: Attack parents of dead children on social media and blame vaccines or claim the kids don't exist.

Please explain to me how putting two in the back of the skull of every single person that engages in this behavior would not be a net win for humanity.

Meanwhile, a CNN opinion piece wants social media to censor anti-vaxers.

I get the sentiment, but who gets censored next? Who gets to decide what's real and what's not? It'll start with obvious things: anti-vaxers, flat Earthers, pedos, etc., but eventually it'll start to become political or get based upon what's popular at the time rather than what can be backed up with scientific fact.

Leisher wrote: Please explain to me how putting two in the back of the skull of every single person that engages in this behavior would not be a net win for humanity.

No argument here.

Leisher wrote: Meanwhile, a CNN opinion piece wants social media to censor anti-vaxers.

I mean, you just wanted some of them killed

I'm really torn here. I'm a big fan of freedom of speech, but these people, ugh........

TheCatt wrote: I mean, you just wanted some of them killed

But I didn't say they should have their freedom of speech taken away!!

Leisher wrote:

TheCatt wrote: I mean, you just wanted some of them killed

But I didn't say they should have their freedom of speech taken away!!

Pretty sure dead men don't talk.

TheCatt wrote:

Leisher wrote:

TheCatt wrote: I mean, you just wanted some of them killed

But I didn't say they should have their freedom of speech taken away!!

Pretty sure dead men don't talk.

They used their freedom of speech to get themselves removed from the population. I'm not seeing the problem...

TheCatt wrote:[post]
I'm really torn here. I'm a big fan of freedom of speech, but these people, ugh........

That's the difference between believing in the principle and lip service.

Vince wrote:

TheCatt wrote:[post]
I'm really torn here. I'm a big fan of freedom of speech, but these people, ugh........

That's the difference between believing in the principle and lip service.

No, it's the difference between allowing people to harm others, or not.