Here:
Vaginal Terms of Service:
If you insert a penis into vagina, you live with whatever consequences of said vagina owner's decisions. Insertion implies agreement.
Here:
Yep. If only a man is responsible for pregnancy then only the man should decide what to do with any kid.
Indeed.
If she doesn’t want to make those decisions, she should keep her legs shut
This is the reason I really don't trust Planned Parenthood as an honest broker in these discussions. If they really pushed the morning after pill as their primary and preferred method of dealing with an (possible) unwanted pregnancy, it'd be a lot tougher on the pro-life side of the argument. How many lives will that be taking? And LOT of people that consider themselves pro-life wouldn't even argue that the day after conception you can consider it a life. How many babies would that be? Who knows. The woman taking the pill doesn't even know if she's pregnant.Leisher wrote:[
Additionally, if you're the one who ultimately gets to decide if something lives or dies based on your mood, then maybe you should take birth control more seriously?
Equality!
The challenge with "emergency contraception" is that it's only between 50 and 75% effective. So that's still a fair number of unwanted pregnancies. Whereas abortion has a much higher success rate.Vince wrote: If they really pushed the morning after pill as their primary and preferred method of dealing with an (possible) unwanted pregnancy, it'd be a lot tougher on the pro-life side of the argument. How many lives will that be taking? And LOT of people that consider themselves pro-life wouldn't even argue that the day after conception you can consider it a life. How many babies would that be? Who knows. The woman taking the pill doesn't even know if she's pregnant.
I was just checking the stats before I posted that. The stat I saw was if used within 24 hrs, they said it was 95% effective. 89% if used within 72 hrs. Oral contraceptives showed a 7% failure, which is also the BC method PP promotes.TheCatt wrote:The challenge with "emergency contraception" is that it's only between 50 and 75% effective. So that's still a fair number of unwanted pregnancies. Whereas abortion has a much higher success rate.Vince wrote: If they really pushed the morning after pill as their primary and preferred method of dealing with an (possible) unwanted pregnancy, it'd be a lot tougher on the pro-life side of the argument. How many lives will that be taking? And LOT of people that consider themselves pro-life wouldn't even argue that the day after conception you can consider it a life. How many babies would that be? Who knows. The woman taking the pill doesn't even know if she's pregnant.
Ah, the data I was looking at was for up 120 hours.
Okay, then that explains it. That's not a good use of the drug, to be honest. Horrible bleeding and pain when used further along in the pregnancy. Used as intended (they call it "the morning after" pill for a reason), it's more effective with a lot fewer side effects.TheCatt wrote: Ah, the data I was looking at was for up 120 hours.
This is the third incident or so this year. The pro-aborts are pretty intolerant.TheCatt wrote: https://abc11.com/anti-abortion-group-m ... s/5303214/
Anti-abortion advocate attacked at UNC. Captured on video. That's not productive
Anit-abortions have sent bombs, shot people, and sent hundreds of fake Anthrax packages, but ok, that compares to mild assault somehow?