Page 45 of 76
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:51 pm
by TheCatt
CLIN-TON! CLIN-TON!
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:43 am
by thibodeaux
My God, can you imagine: President Hillary? I think she should be ineligible because she was already "co-president" for 2 terms.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:30 am
by TheCatt
Clinton or Obama? Which would you choose?
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 9:32 am
by Leisher
Hospitals and drug makers are pissed at Obama.
This article stunned me. That's the MSM not only calling Obama a liar, but also completely destroying his argument for raising taxes on those who make more than $1,000,000. For good measure they call Warren Buffet a liar too!
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:11 am
by thibodeaux
TheCatt wrote:Clinton or Obama? Which would you choose?
Obama, no question.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:21 am
by TheCatt
I think I'd rather have Clinton.
I mean, Obama's been a disaster... Clinton, there's at least a chance of something different.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:33 am
by thibodeaux
TheCatt wrote:I mean, Obama's been a disaster... Clinton, there's at least a chance of something different.
Hope and Change?
I'll take Evil and Incompetent over Evil and Efficient any day.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:40 am
by TPRJones
TheCatt wrote:I mean, Obama's been a disaster... Clinton, there's at least a chance of something different.
I have no doubt that Clinton would have been a worse disaster.
Better a Democratic President that can't get anything done than one that can.
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:37 pm
by GORDON
TPRJones wrote:TheCatt wrote:I mean, Obama's been a disaster... Clinton, there's at least a chance of something different.
I have no doubt that Clinton would have been a worse disaster.
Better a Democratic President that can't get anything done than one that can.
Obama has accomplished too much as it is. I can't see bow hillary could be worse, especially with a republican legislature.
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 2:02 pm
by Leisher
Obama still hates women, and the [url=http://news.yahoo.com/white-house-boys- ... MjRiNzAwLW
I3MDAtM2EwYy1hMDI5LTZhODRlMDEyMTBlMARwb3MDNARzZWMDbmV3c19mb3JfeW91BHZlcgMxMzc5YjY3MC1lNDVk
LTExZTAtYmZjNi00YzJlNWU1Y2E4N2M-;_ylg=X3oDMTJyc2ttZ2RlBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDNmRhNTQwOGMtNzFjOC0zMzdlLThkOTYtNWYxNT
ZiNjRlZTRkBHBzdGNhdAN1cwRwdANzdG9yeXBhZ2UEdGVzdAM-;_ylv=3]MSM is finally calling him on it.[/url]
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:11 pm
by TheCatt
If I were married to Michelle, I'd hate women too.
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:15 am
by Leisher
Obama: "Republicans would cripple the U.S.". You know, as opposed to copying the socialist policies in Europe that have been such a huge success that four nations are about to default on their debt.
Interesting new tactic for Obama: Spend a metric fuck ton of money. Spend more money. Spend even more money. Watch the economy tank. Spend more money. Spend more money again. Watch as everything you do does nothing to help the economy. Try to push through more spending and claim everyone who doesn't agree with spending even more money is the problem. Then say Republican policies would cripple the country.
I understand he's trying to charge up his base, but that stance will get him destroyed in debates.
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:21 am
by Leisher
Obama: [url=http://news.yahoo.com/obama-no-jobs-bil ... ZjE1MjNiLW
I0YmMtM2Y0NS1iZmYxLTYzYjRlNmM4ZGE5NgRwb3MDNARzZWMDbmV3c19mb3JfeW91BHZlcgMwMzU3ODRiMC1lOGE1
LTExZTAtYmIzNS0zNTI1YmE5MjI1ZTE-;_ylg=X3oDMTMxYzd1ZTlmBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDZjJiOTI3YWItYTM2ZC0zYjM5LTk0NGMtYWU3ZD
YwYjdmZmM0BHBzdGNhdANidXNpbmVzcwRwdANzdG9yeXBhZ2UEdGVzdAM-;_ylv=3]"If we don't pass my jobs bill, we'll just get a new Congress."[/url]
WTF? How can anyone try to argue that this guy unites anyone? This is as polarizing as it gets.
Also, here's proof the guy is fucking delusional:
He argues that the public supports his proposals
Weird. Here's a guy who has a giant staff of people who give him poll results on an hourly basis, yet he still believe that the majority of the public supports his jobs bill (they don't).
I guess he's hoping if he says it enough, it'll become true.
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:34 am
by Leisher
[url=http://news.yahoo.com/obama-gets-burned ... Njc1MWRmLW
Y0ZjAtMzY5Yi04ODkxLTVjYTU3Y2M0Y2Q1NgRwb3MDNQRzZWMDbmV3c19mb3JfeW91BHZlcgNkNWQ0Y2EwMC1lODhk
LTExZTAtYWY3Ny1lNWQ1YjFlNTQyN2U-;_ylg=X3oDMTMxYzd1ZTlmBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDZjJiOTI3YWItYTM2ZC0zYjM5LTk0NGMtYWU3ZD
YwYjdmZmM0BHBzdGNhdANidXNpbmVzcwRwdANzdG9yeXBhZ2UEdGVzdAM-;_ylv=3]Obama doesn't understand science.[/url]
So he thinks the wildfires in Texas are caused by global warming, and mocks Rick Perry for thinking man-made climate change is horseshit. Wow.
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:41 am
by Leisher
Obama's speech to blacks wasn't racist (although it SOOOO was), but the coverage was.
That's according to Karen Hunter, an African-American author.
Why? Because the AP reported it, as he said it:
"Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes," he said, his voice rising as applause and cheers mounted. "Shake it off. Stop complainin'. Stop grumblin'. Stop cryin'. We are going to press on. We have work to do."
Did you see the racism? They left off the Gs...
Now listen to Karen's explanation that explains a lot more than she realizes:
"I teach a journalism class, and I tell my students to fix people's grammar, because you don't want them to sound ignorant," she said.
Someone should explain to Karen that not only was Obama's speech ridiculously racist, [url=http://news.yahoo.com/obama-drops-bedro ... MzJhMmM5LW
M4M2YtM2JkNy05N2RkLTExYjU1MjMwNjRmMwRwb3MDMgRzZWMDbmV3c19mb3JfeW91BHZlcgM1MTc3YmU4MC1lODcz
LTExZTAtOTdmMy04YzY3YTYxZDQxZDI-;_ylg=X3oDMTMxYzd1ZTlmBGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRwc3RhaWQDZjJiOTI3YWItYTM2ZC0zYjM5LTk0NGMtYWU3ZD
YwYjdmZmM0BHBzdGNhdANidXNpbmVzcwRwdANzdG9yeXBhZ2UEdGVzdAM-;_ylv=3]which this guy points out,[/url] but by teaching budding "journalists" that it's ok to alter someone's words, she's actually teaching them to alter the facts that they should be reporting.
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:57 pm
by GORDON
Malcolm wrote:I'm still waiting for the practical wind/solar/geothermal/biofuel energy supply that can reliably outproduce a modern power plant.
Heard a good one the other day:
How many solar panel production plants get all the energy they need from their own solar panels?
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:45 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote:Please reign in spending.
Please reign in spending.
Please reign in spending.
Ha!
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:46 pm
by GORDON
GORDON wrote:TPRJones wrote:Now I have to wonder, can we ever again have a WASP male President? Or will the next nominees have to be hispanic, or a woman, or jewish, or gay (Not that there's anything wrong with that) (Not that there's anything wrong with that), or whatever else, in order to compete in getting out voters excited for the historical signifigance?
That occurred to me a couple months ago.... if a black candidate is the only thing that can unify the black community, how can any party ever again run a non-black candidate?
Black = win if the other guy is white.
Just wanted to say, if Cain gets the nomination, my prognostication begins to look correct.
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:33 pm
by TheCatt
GORDON wrote:TheCatt wrote:Please reign in spending.
Please reign in spending.
Please reign in spending.
Ha!
Joke's on us.
Edited By TheCatt on 1318469610
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 9:02 am
by thibodeaux
TheCatt wrote:GORDON wrote:TheCatt wrote:Please reign in spending.
Please reign in spending.
Please reign in spending.
Ha!
Joke's on us.
On WHO? Who was silly enough to believe he would cut spending? Who thought he even WANTED to?