Page 5 of 11

Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:16 pm
by GORDON
I still want to know how it is legal to be able to put down the cash in order to use he TSA fast lane.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:37 am
by GORDON
TSA wants to unionize, in spite of the fact it is against the law to do so.

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/24670

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 11:48 am
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:TSA wants to unionize, in spite of the fact it is against the law to do so.

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/24670
A perfect storm of incompetency.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:13 pm
by GORDON
I bet they unionize and the government wont care.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 1:39 pm
by TheCatt
Opting out doesn't really matter.
The TSA points out that even if an airport decides to use a private firm for security, the screeners still must follow TSA guidelines. That would include using enhanced pat-downs and the full-body scanners if they are installed at the airport.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 2:26 pm
by Malcolm
Who sits there & verifies that all the private folk follow the TSA guidelines?

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:20 pm
by TheCatt
Millions invaded, 130 items found.
"This year alone, the use of advanced imaging technology has led to the detection of over 130 prohibited, illegal or dangerous items," TSA spokesman Greg Soule told FoxNews.com. The TSA would not disclose exactly what those items were, but it said they included weapons like ceramic knives and various drugs -- including a syringe filled with heroine hidden in a passenger’s underwear.

Read more: ]http://www.foxnews.com/us....]

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:53 pm
by thibodeaux
It's always about drugs, isn't it?

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 4:45 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:...including a syringe filled with heroine hidden in a passenger’s underwear.
Explain how a passenger with a single hit of heroin is a threat to aviation security, especially when you assholes are supposed to be fondling people in the name of looking for chemicals that explode.

Posted: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:01 pm
by TPRJones
But they could have used it to get the pilot addicted to illegal drugs then hijacked the plan by refusing to give him another hit unless he did what they said!

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:03 am
by TheCatt
TSA considering less human-body representative imaging.
The TSA is testing new X-ray technology that will show a "stick figure" instead of a passenger's full-body image. Viewers on the other end of the X-ray would see anomalies -- anything from a suicide vest to a cell phone on a belt clip -- highlighted on the anatomically-ambiguous figure.

No images were available to illustrate what the new scan would look like.

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:04 pm
by thibodeaux

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:13 pm
by TheCatt
Incoming Republicans want change.
The incoming leaders of the House Transportation Committee on Friday called the new airport pat-down procedures "overly intrusive" and demanded that the Transportation Security Administration restrict their use.

In a letter to the TSA, Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., and Rep. Thomas Petri, R-Wis., who are set to assume leadership of aviation issues in Congress next year when Republicans take control, said only the highest risk passengers should be subjected to the more aggressive pat-downs.

It is the harshest reaction to date on the new searches from key leaders in Congress.

"The entire focus of TSA's efforts to improve aviation security needs to be revisited," Mica and Petri wrote in the letter. They accused TSA of reacting to old threats — in this case, the so-called "underwear bomber" who attempted to blow up a jet last Christmas — while failing to be "proactive."

Mica is expected to become chairman of the full Transportation Committee, and Petri is in line to lead the Aviation Subcommittee.

"Really now, who thinks the public will put up with the kind of behavior that would get you arrested if you weren't working for the government?" Petri said. "Do we really expect Grandma to go through this?"


FINALLY

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:25 pm
by thibodeaux
Yes, curse the Democrats for foisting these useless government drones, the TSA and DHS, upon us. If only the Republicans had been in charge when these organizations were created....

Posted: Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:35 pm
by Malcolm
Zing.
And I can take over the plane with nail clippers?
Double zing.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:43 am
by GORDON
I think as a Marine in that situation I would be tempted to tell the TSA agent to get the fuck out of my face.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:37 am
by unkbill
I had no problem with anything that was done to me on my trip home. Was patted down twice. Had my bottle of water confiscated in Korea. Didn't think anything of it till a dozen people walked onto the plane with Starbucks coffee. Guess that isn't considered a liguid.
In Jakarta my wife made the comment she wondered about women. She noticed no women working and what would happen if a women needs patted down. Some of there people preach you never touch a female unless she is related.
Of course there foreign minister made a big deal about "I'm not shaking Michele Obamas hand because she isn't related." Well someone had a cell phone video and posted it on youtube. He claimed she reached out and grabbed his hand. Most people after watching the video called him a hypocrite.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2010 4:57 pm
by TheCatt

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:42 am
by thibodeaux
Some good news.
"Molester, pervert, disgusting, an embarrassment, creep. These are all words I have heard today at work describing me, said in my presence as I patted passengers down. These comments are painful and demoralizing, one day is bad enough, but I have to come back tomorrow, the next day and the day after that to keep hearing these comments. If something doesn’t change in the next two weeks I don’t know how much longer I can withstand this taunting. I go home and I cry. I am serving my country, I should not have to go home and cry after a day of honorably serving my country."


One correction: you are NOT serving your country, much less honorably. Maybe you should quit?

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 11:24 am
by GORDON
I bet making comments to your designated groper becomes criminalized.