Page 26 of 72
Re: More proof
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:08 am
by TheCatt
Yeah, cuz politics telling science to STFU is wonderful.
Re: More proof
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 1:29 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:
Yeah, cuz politics telling science to STFU is wonderful.
According to documents obtained by a number of news agencies, staff at the Environmental Protection Agency, and the departments of the Interior, Agriculture, and Health and Human Services have been ordered not to send out news releases, create new blog entries or update official website content. They also must seek agreement from senior officials before speaking to the media and in some instances Congress. This prompted a group of US Senators to write to President Trump to remind him that it is against the law to interfere with federal employees’ communications to Congress.
Wow. That sounds unbelievably illegal.
Re: More proof
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 4:27 pm
by Vince
TheCatt wrote:
Yeah, cuz politics telling science to STFU is wonderful.
It isn't. And politics telling science what they want them to say or their funding is at risk isn't wonderful either.
Re: More proof
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:17 am
by Leisher
Re: More proof
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 12:50 pm
by GORDON
Enjoy the pile on.
Re: More proof
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:17 pm
by Vince
The sad part is that I read an article when this was released that said that groups were in a rush to download the data from NOAA before the data was corrected. I can only assume that they are in a rush so they can use that data to show what they want to show while still saying they are using US government NOAA data.
This isn't science.
More proof
Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:42 pm
by GORDON
More proof
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:58 pm
by GORDON
Wrong.
But it was my understanding that the sky was falling.
More proof
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:07 am
by Leisher
I'm sure this will be the top story at all the MSM outlets that have been screaming about our doom.
More proof
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 4:47 pm
by Leisher
Doing research for my essay on global warming and found
this logical skeptic scientist.
Pretty interesting reading.
More proof
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:00 pm
by Leisher
More proof
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:35 pm
by GORDON
HuffPo writer HOPES it happens.
Probably a russian plant.
More proof
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 7:31 am
by Leisher
Remember when SF sued gun manufacturers for mass shootings and got laughed out of court?
NY City is suing 5 oil companies blaming them for global warming.
More proof
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:49 am
by Leisher
Famous LGBT lawyer immolates himself to protest climate issues.
UH...If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Point being, sure, here's a blurb about your death, but how many people will ever read it? If he wanted to make an impact he needed to get on TV or YouTube.
More proof "environmentalists" are fill of shit
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:11 pm
by Cakedaddy
I didn't read it. But just curious, did he use fossil or bio fuel to do it?
More proof
Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2018 10:18 pm
by GORDON
Ha. I'm picturing a field of perfectly aligned mirrors, focuing sunlight onto his chest...
More proof
Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 9:21 am
by Leisher
Cakedaddy wrote: I didn't read it. But just curious, did he use fossil or bio fuel to do it?
He used fossil fuels to make a point.
More proof
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 3:35 pm
by Leisher
Cuomo wants to ban plastic bags.
I don't really have a big issue with this idea. Reducing waste isn't a bad thing.
More proof
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:01 pm
by GORDON
The fossil fuels used to transport bags made of heavier materials will outweigh the pollution of plastic.
Probably.
More proof
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:32 pm
by Leisher
It'll all be moot if that new plastic eating bacteria works out.