Page 194 of 728
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 5:16 pm
by Malcolm
TheCatt wrote:All my fantasy teams are done.
I swung and missed big on my RB1 pick in both leagues this year.
catt league: fucking Jeremy Hill
cash league: fucking Lamar Miller
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 6:33 pm
by Leisher
Vegas is holding off on the Colts-Patriots line. I'll bet they start it at 20 because the Patriots are going to try and run up the score.
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:15 am
by Leisher
Biggest tactical error I've ever seen was just made in my fantasy league.
A guy has a commanding lead over his division. He loses Jamaal Charles for the season. Two guys in his division have priority on the waiver wire. There is NOBODY left in free agency RBs that's a starter or that even sees any time.
Our league also has no trades. He has no RBs on his bench.
They could have completely hamstrung him for the remainder of the season, yet somehow they let him grab Charles' replacement, West.
The worst part is that one of them is in desperate need of a RB.
Edited By Leisher on 1444832612
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:45 am
by Malcolm
Cowboys agree with Browns and bench Weeden.
... yet somehow they let him grab Charles' replacement, West.
Reid says it's RBBC, but I'd expect it to be 75/25 on the West side before too long.
Edited By Malcolm on 1444833951
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:54 am
by Stranger
Leisher wrote:Biggest tactical error I've ever seen was just made in my fantasy league.
A guy has a commanding lead over his division. He loses Jamaal Charles for the season. Two guys in his division have priority on the waiver wire. There is NOBODY left in free agency RBs that's a starter or that even sees any time.
Our league also has no trades. He has no RBs on his bench.
They could have completely hamstrung him for the remainder of the season, yet somehow they let him grab Charles' replacement, West.
The worst part is that one of them is in desperate need of a RB.
You must be passive aggressively referring to me?
I get what you're saying but I don't need another RB and then I'd just drop another RB in a similar situation as Chadcardrick West, which I guess is the second coming of Jim Brown in your opinion
Biggest tactical error ever?? Get real!
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 10:57 am
by Malcolm
West is Charles, Jr. Granted, I'm not expecting the Chiefs to dominate this year, but Alex Smith isn't going to step up and get points.
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:08 am
by Leisher
Stranger wrote:Leisher wrote:Biggest tactical error I've ever seen was just made in my fantasy league.
A guy has a commanding lead over his division. He loses Jamaal Charles for the season. Two guys in his division have priority on the waiver wire. There is NOBODY left in free agency RBs that's a starter or that even sees any time.
Our league also has no trades. He has no RBs on his bench.
They could have completely hamstrung him for the remainder of the season, yet somehow they let him grab Charles' replacement, West.
The worst part is that one of them is in desperate need of a RB.
You must be passive aggressively referring to me?
I get what you're saying but I don't need another RB and then I'd just drop another RB in a similar situation as Chadcardrick West, which I guess is the second coming of Jim Brown in your opinion
Biggest tactical error ever?? Get real!
I wasn't being passive aggressive to you. I had already looked at your team, and like me, you would have had to drop a RB to grab West. Gary, on the other hand, had a higher waiver priority, needs RBs, and didn't get West.
And no, he's not the second coming of Brown, not sure how you reached that conclusion, but he is a starter.
And yeah, when your division's leader loses his #1 player and has one option to replace him, not grabbing him is a big deal.
Your brother made a MUCH bigger error. He had #1 priority and he grabbed Theo Riddick. Ha!
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 11:30 am
by Malcolm
Your brother made a MUCH bigger error. He had #1 priority and he grabbed Theo Riddick. Ha!
Theo Riddick's not going to be a success unless Vin Diesel decides to bring him in as a sidekick.
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 1:52 pm
by Leisher
Still no Vegas line on Patriots-Colts...
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2015 2:01 pm
by Malcolm
Leisher wrote:Still no Vegas line on Patriots-Colts...
Every oddsmaker is calling every member of the Indy training staff he knows before they do.
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 10:41 am
by Malcolm
Weeden "is pissed." The football world is trembling.
Brown annoyed with Vick.
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 3:24 pm
by Malcolm
Pouncey to fill in his "buy 10 ankle surgeries, get 1 free" card.
Edited By Malcolm on 1444937085
Posted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 11:22 pm
by Malcolm
The Falcons were undefeated before this ... how? Is it perhaps the fact they have the pussiest schedule in the entire NFL this season?
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 8:27 am
by Leisher
http://espn.go.com/sportsn....esponds
Tom Brady slams Coca-Cola. I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with him.
I do think it's funny that he doesn't believe in doing what people tell him. He plays in a sport where coaches tell him what to do constantly, and he and his team and known for not following rules. Pick your joke.
By the way, I was really torn between Brees and Dalton this week. Thankfully, I went with Dalton. Brees was only worth 17 points despite throwing for over 300 yards. (Only 1 TD)
Edited By Leisher on 1444998541
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 10:30 am
by Leisher
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:15 am
by TheCatt
But he sticks up for sham medicine guy.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:15 am
by Malcolm
Tom Brady slams Coca-Cola. I think this is the first time I've ever agreed with him.
Frosted Flakes as well.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:26 am
by Malcolm
Official/spectator suspended for one game.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:38 am
by Leisher
Kellogg's response pretty much proved Brady was talking out of his ass on Frosted Flakes.
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2015 11:50 am
by Malcolm
Most cereal is artificially enriched with vitamins, if I remember. Hell, you may as well pop some pills and eat oatmeal for the same effect.