Page 19 of 21
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:14 pm
by Malcolm
The Colts/Jets vs. the Saints/Vikes.
Anyone psychotic enough to pick New York for an upset?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 10:40 pm
by Troy
Malcolm wrote:The Colts/Jets vs. the Saints/Vikes.
Anyone psychotic enough to pick New York for an upset?
I will.
I picked em for tonight too.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:39 am
by TheCatt
No. In all honesty, the only question is who will play Indy in the Super Bowl.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:42 am
by Leisher
Indy laid down for the Jets with two games to go in the season, which essentially put the Jets into the playoffs.
Let's see if karma catches up with the Colts.
Keep in mind that the Jets held the NO offense to 10 points in NO earlier in the year. So they can stop good offenses. their biggest question marks involve their own offense, particularly at QB.
P.S. Do you think Mark Sanchez has emailed or called Pete Carroll to tell him to suck his dick? If you remember, Pete Carroll publically blasted Mark Sanchez for leaving after his junior year saying he wasn't ready, etc. Now Sanchez is one game away from the Super Bowl and Pete Carroll had to flee USC because of the NCAA investigation that's about to drop the hammer on the football program.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:38 pm
by Troy
Leisher wrote:Indy laid down for the Jets with two games to go in the season, which essentially put the Jets into the playoffs.
Let's see if karma catches up with the Colts.
Keep in mind that the Jets held the NO offense to 10 points in NO earlier in the year. So they can stop good offenses. their biggest question marks involve their own offense, particularly at QB.
P.S. Do you think Mark Sanchez has emailed or called Pete Carroll to tell him to suck his dick? If you remember, Pete Carroll publically blasted Mark Sanchez for leaving after his junior year saying he wasn't ready, etc. Now Sanchez is one game away from the Super Bowl and Pete Carroll had to flee USC because of the NCAA investigation that's about to drop the hammer on the football program.
He did make that wisecrack at the press conference after the Bengal's game.
That was funny.
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:08 pm
by TheCatt
Troy wrote:Malcolm wrote:The Colts/Jets vs. the Saints/Vikes.
Anyone psychotic enough to pick New York for an upset?
I will.
I picked em for tonight too.
Spread/$ on the game?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 8:48 am
by unkbill
Good Lord my Vikings kicked Dallas' ass. If they can only play that well on the road in another dome. My Vikes might not win but am hoping for a good game out of them and are not embarrassing . Of course that means Farve might not retire......
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:44 pm
by Malcolm
unkbill wrote:Good Lord my Vikings kicked Dallas' ass. If they can only play that well on the road in another dome. My Vikes might not win but am hoping for a good game out of them and are not embarrassing . Of course that means Farve might not retire......
I ain't saying it's impossible for the Vikings secondary to stop New Orleans. That cuts both ways, too. Minnesota could tear up the Saints D. I'm curious about the running games, though. Reggie Bush has been kicking much ass as of late.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:02 pm
by Malcolm
Vikes & Saints. Looks to be a game of who's offense is going to fuck up more. If this shyte doesn't produce a huge scoring affair, I don't know what will.
EDIT : Three seconds later, TD, Pierre Thomas.
Edited By Malcolm on 1264377824
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:43 pm
by Leisher
This is a great game.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:47 pm
by TheCatt
I'll give the Wall Street Journal credit. They predicted 29-28 (which is based on the average of lots of simulations)... and 28-28 with less than 2 minutes to go is pretty close.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:49 pm
by Leisher
This game is still on, but would there be a better ending for Favre than beating Peyton Manning in the Super Bowl?
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:53 pm
by Leisher
If he ran instead of throwing, this game would be over.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:10 pm
by Leisher
This'll be interesting. How does this rule work? He obviously lost the ball and recovered behind the first down line.
Must not matter.
Edited By Leisher on 1264389091
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:12 pm
by Leisher
HORRIBLE call!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:15 pm
by Malcolm
I can't believe the Vikes turned it over on their last drive in the 4th. Fucking really, you HAD to throw it, really?!?!?!
EDIT : Childress, you're a fucking retard that deserves to be burned to death tied to a crossbar.
Edited By Malcolm on 1264389360
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:21 pm
by Leisher
I predict Favre is back next year.
New Orleans, no matter if they win or lose the Super Bowl, will not get back to the NFC Championship next year.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:43 pm
by Malcolm
Leisher wrote:I predict Favre is back next year.
2 year contract, I heard, so yeah.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:47 pm
by TheCatt
Leisher wrote:If he ran instead of throwing, this game would be over.
I don't think he was as open as the commentators made it sound, but I certainly think he could have made the 30-32 yd line.
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2010 11:00 pm
by Malcolm
It's still a dome. I'd feel more comfortable giving a lengthy kick to Longwell as opposed to another throw.