Page 14 of 76

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:09 am
by Leisher
I'm too lazy to look it up, but someone here predicted this tactic:
Disagreeing with Lord Obama makes you racist.

You'd think that the worst president in history wouldn't be anxious to defend the guy that's on pace to take his title.

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:12 pm
by Malcolm
Carter, a Democrat, said Joe Wilson's outburst was a part of a disturbing trend directed at the president that has included demonstrators equating Obama to Nazi leaders.

Where the fuck were you four years ago?

& Carter's not the worst prez in history. Maybe top 10. He is proving to be an extraordinarily ignorant ass, though.




Edited By Malcolm on 1253117601

Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:16 pm
by TheCatt
Sooo tired of the race card.

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 5:32 pm
by GORDON
Obama throws away eastern European missile shield, tells Poland to go fuck themselves, 70 years to the day after the Soviet Union took them over.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion....-russia




Edited By GORDON on 1253309608

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:27 pm
by Malcolm
I'm beginning to think that the reason the rest of the world likes Obama so much is the same reason frat boys invite stupid college freshmen females to their keggers.

Easy target.

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:52 pm
by DoctorChaos
And Bush was said to have ruined US relations with the rest of the world.

What a jackass.

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:19 am
by Malcolm
DoctorChaos wrote:And Bush was said to have ruined US relations with the rest of the world.

What a jackass.
He had the diplomatic finesse & rhetoric skills of an anvil. On the other hand, a walking vagina isn't any better.

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 7:46 am
by thibodeaux
I guess the question is: is it better to be a dick, an asshole, or a pussy?

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 8:57 am
by Leisher
We simply went from one extreme to the other.

We had the cowboy who said things needed to be done his way, and if you don't like it, then get out of our way.

Now we've got the equivalent of a pathetic girl in high school who's willing to sleep with anyone just so that people like her.




Edited By Leisher on 1253365083

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 12:17 pm
by DoctorChaos
How is throwing Poland under a bus pleasing everyone?

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:39 pm
by Malcolm
DoctorChaos wrote:How is throwing Poland under a bus pleasing everyone?

It's getting Russia off our back so they'll be more apt to throw in w\ us on bitchslapping Iran & N. Korea, which will in turn go a long way towards getting China off our backs over the same issues.

Fucking U.N. security council veto power.




Edited By Malcolm on 1253385565

Posted: Sat Sep 19, 2009 4:11 pm
by Leisher
Poland is in the AV Club. Sure, they're a good friend, but you can shit on them, and they'll take it because they're happy to just have a friend.

Russia is a cool kid who doesn't give a shit if you're friends or not.

And what Malcolm said about making them happy to get their backing on the security council is valid.

International diplomacy was not Bush's strong point, but again, that doesn't make Obama awesome at it by default.

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:34 pm
by GORDON
Ten points to whomever can find where, in these forums, I said Obama would be bailing out newspapers.

It may have even been in this thread.

http://thehill.com/blogs....-bill?h

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:47 am
by TPRJones
Obama said that good journalism is "critical to the health of our democracy,"


Then why is he bailing out the newspapers?

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:14 am
by Malcolm
TPRJones wrote:
Obama said that good journalism is "critical to the health of our democracy,"
Then why is he bailing out the newspapers?
Following that, he said ...
"I am concerned that if the direction of the news is all blogosphere, all opinions, with no serious fact-checking, no serious attempts to put stories in context, that what you will end up getting is people shouting at each other across the void but not a lot of mutual understanding," he said.

You're concerned that online news outlets don't fact check? That media may degenerate into one meaningless soundbyte after another? Yeah, that'll be a shitty day when that happens.

Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:18 am
by TheCatt
Hmmm, I thought most newspapers were already non-profits.

*groan*

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 8:05 pm
by GORDON
If you've lost Big Bird, you've lost middle America.

<object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/_uGDxkB52uy7c ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/_uGDxkB52uy7cHqPxTRgQA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" width="512" height="296"></embed></object>

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:34 pm
by TPRJones
So, should we delete this thread to protect the two people who selected the second answer to this poll up above? Before the feds come and take them away like they did with the Facebook poll?

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:51 pm
by TheCatt
I dunno, I'm guessing the feds are still trying to figure out what assinated means.

Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:03 pm
by Leisher
Interesting clip from Conan.

Do they reflect his views or are they going after the older, more conservative leaning audience that they've lost since Leno left?