Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:22 pm
The one were Wesley didn't was the best.
Even if it never happened.
Even if it never happened.
Welcome to Thunderdome
RIP Gordon
http://www.dtman.com/forum3/
Coolest ST:TNG moment? - Time to nerd.
Page 2 of 4
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:24 pm
Well, it was a good show IN SPITE of wesley crusher.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:58 pm
Well, it was a good show IN SPITE of wesley crusher.
He was tolerable initially, but got really annoying as the show went on. Didn't he become a Jedi or something? Ugh.
Oh, another cool moment was when the Enterprise went into the neutral zone based on info from the defecting Romulan general and were trapped by three Romulan Warbirds. The unexpected Birds of Prey as backup was pretty sweet.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:54 pm
I remember it vaguely as.
Wesley: NOOOOOOOOOO!
(everything stops)
Wesley: OMGWTF I ownzer time!
Q: You are a jedi now, and leave the show.
Wesley: NOOOOOOOOOO!
(everything stops)
Wesley: OMGWTF I ownzer time!
Q: You are a jedi now, and leave the show.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:10 pm
In some ways, that was a black day for the series.
In other ways, it was good cos he finally fucking left.
In other ways, it was good cos he finally fucking left.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:17 pm
Q always rocked in that show. Locutus was cool too, other then that I don't know. I mean I like the show but can't really place any great scenes.
BTW i finally saw the time traveling - tiboles episode of DS9, now that was a damn great episode. And Worf not wanting to talk about how the Klingons look was just great
Edited By Zetleft on 1151356741
BTW i finally saw the time traveling - tiboles episode of DS9, now that was a damn great episode. And Worf not wanting to talk about how the Klingons look was just great
Edited By Zetleft on 1151356741
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:21 pm
Yeah, if you want to open it up to DS9, there are lots of good bits. In comparison to that pansy TNG show, at least.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 8:50 pm
Know what my problem with DS9 is? And stop reading if you don't want it tainted...
Avery Brooks, Captain Cisco, is a straight-up punk ass white-people-hating bitch racist, and there was even a fistfight once between him and the doctor over a white woman. The TNG cast got along great, and the set was a great, fun place to be. The DS9 set was a tomb. So I've heard.
Avery Brooks, Captain Cisco, is a straight-up punk ass white-people-hating bitch racist, and there was even a fistfight once between him and the doctor over a white woman. The TNG cast got along great, and the set was a great, fun place to be. The DS9 set was a tomb. So I've heard.
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:14 pm
And DS9 sucked.
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 10:48 am
Amen. I remember like two episodes that didn't make me want to retch. I ususually give Rene Auberjonois & Armin Shimmerman the benefit of the doubt, too.And DS9 sucked.
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:29 pm
And DS9 sucked.
I think it sucked too.
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:33 pm
I've watched most of the episodes lately, and I can say this... the last couple years, I guess they got someone on the writing staff who...
Well, there was a war-story arc for a couple years. It was pretty cool seeing hundreds and hundreds of ships in combat around the station.
Well, there was a war-story arc for a couple years. It was pretty cool seeing hundreds and hundreds of ships in combat around the station.
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:35 pm
Exactly. I never caught the show on air since the local channels didn't show ds9. But when I finally saw the last seasons on spike I loved actually seeing full blown wars going on in the star trek universe, sue me :pI've watched most of the episodes lately, and I can say this... the last couple years, I guess they got someone on the writing staff who...
Well, there was a war-story arc for a couple years. It was pretty cool seeing hundreds and hundreds of ships in combat around the station.
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:52 pm
DS9 was also stupid because it was a space station that really wasn't that important. I mean they tried to pretend it was vital, but if it was, wouldn't the Federation have placed more protection around it or at least had ships come to dock there more frequently.
I think they were trying to make a character driven Trek story without all the space travel and realized the characters sucked so they spiced it up with space battles and Worf.
And was it me or did everyone on Voyager look like a total pussy? When your toughest guy is a chick, there's a problem.
TNG worked well because it was our galaxy they explored and fought in. The crew got along and were perfectly cast. They had multiple badasses, one hippie, and one diplomat. They had their playboy in Ryker, their humor in Data, their Oscar speeches in Picard, etc. Interestingly, they didn't really have anyone cast for sex appeal. (I wonder why? Really.)
If...I'm sorry...When Trek gets brought back (and it's still too soon), they need to follow the ST and TNG formula. Friends who are as close as family traveling through space among other friends and enemies. Make them capable and their ship tough, don't make them the hunted.
I once told someone of a plan I had for a Trek relaunch...
I think they were trying to make a character driven Trek story without all the space travel and realized the characters sucked so they spiced it up with space battles and Worf.
And was it me or did everyone on Voyager look like a total pussy? When your toughest guy is a chick, there's a problem.
TNG worked well because it was our galaxy they explored and fought in. The crew got along and were perfectly cast. They had multiple badasses, one hippie, and one diplomat. They had their playboy in Ryker, their humor in Data, their Oscar speeches in Picard, etc. Interestingly, they didn't really have anyone cast for sex appeal. (I wonder why? Really.)
If...I'm sorry...When Trek gets brought back (and it's still too soon), they need to follow the ST and TNG formula. Friends who are as close as family traveling through space among other friends and enemies. Make them capable and their ship tough, don't make them the hunted.
I once told someone of a plan I had for a Trek relaunch...
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:10 pm
Aha!DS9 was also stupid because it was a space station that really wasn't that important. I mean they tried to pretend it was vital, but if it was, wouldn't the Federation have placed more protection around it or at least had ships come to dock there more frequently.
<nerd>
It wasn't a Federation space station, and so only a handful of Starfleet peeps were invited to caretake it. The station was built and used by cardassians while cardassia occupied Bejor. When the Cardassians went home, the Bejorans got the space station as part of the treaty... and right after that the wormhole, the only known stable doorway to the other side of the galaxy, was found. O'Brien moved the space station to the wormhole to claim it for the Bejorans before the Cardassians could do the same. Starfleet provided backup.
Also in that first episode, we saw how Commander Cisco's wife was killed by Picard at Wolf 359. And it was Picard who put Cisco officially in command of the station. There was tension.
</nerd>
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 5:37 pm
I still have hopes for this.If...I'm sorry...When Trek gets brought back...
Posted: Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:50 pm
As to the series of Star Trek, they seem to fit pretty well with Thomas Schatz's stages of genre evolution.
1) Experimental stage: The conventions of the genre are isolated and established. TOS defined just what it was Star Trek was supposed to be, a story of intrepid and capable explorers going where no man had gone before.
2) Classic stage: The conventions reach "equilibrium" and are mutually understood by artists and audience. TNG didn't have to retread "this is what Star Trek is", that was already done. They continued with what TOS had done in most areas of the show, without stepping too far out into new territory as far as the style went. They even had the same intro text (except for "no one" in place of "no man").
3) Refinement stage: Certain formal and stylistic details embellish the form. This would be DS9, where they started to experiement heavily in political storylines, and moving the plots out of federation space and spaceships to look at how the people in the rest of the galaxy interacted. We still have capable characters, but we've stopped with the exploring on the whole, instead focusing on one group of species and situations with ongoing storylines.
4) Baroque stage: The form and its embellishments are accented to the point where they themselves become the "substance" or "content" of the work. Sometimes referred to as the "Parody" stage, this is the point where the genre moves so far away from where it started that it's almost making fun of itself. And this is Voyager, where they go "going where no one has gone before", but they do NOT do so boldly nor are they intrepid and competant explorers. The series is alomst a parody of itself.
After the Baroque stage, a genre typically will cycle back to the first stage. Enterprise took us back to the single ship of intrepid and capable explorers charting unknown space, and the series was reborn ... sort of. It got sidetracked and lost somewhere, so I'm not sure if it really counts as the completion of the cycle.
1) Experimental stage: The conventions of the genre are isolated and established. TOS defined just what it was Star Trek was supposed to be, a story of intrepid and capable explorers going where no man had gone before.
2) Classic stage: The conventions reach "equilibrium" and are mutually understood by artists and audience. TNG didn't have to retread "this is what Star Trek is", that was already done. They continued with what TOS had done in most areas of the show, without stepping too far out into new territory as far as the style went. They even had the same intro text (except for "no one" in place of "no man").
3) Refinement stage: Certain formal and stylistic details embellish the form. This would be DS9, where they started to experiement heavily in political storylines, and moving the plots out of federation space and spaceships to look at how the people in the rest of the galaxy interacted. We still have capable characters, but we've stopped with the exploring on the whole, instead focusing on one group of species and situations with ongoing storylines.
4) Baroque stage: The form and its embellishments are accented to the point where they themselves become the "substance" or "content" of the work. Sometimes referred to as the "Parody" stage, this is the point where the genre moves so far away from where it started that it's almost making fun of itself. And this is Voyager, where they go "going where no one has gone before", but they do NOT do so boldly nor are they intrepid and competant explorers. The series is alomst a parody of itself.
After the Baroque stage, a genre typically will cycle back to the first stage. Enterprise took us back to the single ship of intrepid and capable explorers charting unknown space, and the series was reborn ... sort of. It got sidetracked and lost somewhere, so I'm not sure if it really counts as the completion of the cycle.
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:58 am
BTW, for those of y'all who say DS9 sucked, I offer the following as rebuttle:
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 6:42 pm
Bah. That show was still ass.
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:45 am
Bah. That show was still ass.
Agreed.
While the battles were kind of cool, the participants weren't. I mean who cares about the crew of DS9 in the Defiant? The Cardassians were boring as were The Dominion. So the battles didn't mean anything.
The battles in TNG seemed to be more important. DS9 seemed like a ratings ploy.
And that lesbian kiss has no passion.