Page 2 of 6
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:52 pm
by GORDON
I just suspect his best work is behind him.
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 4:11 pm
by Malcolm
'Twas my reaction when I saw "Spiderman."
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:21 pm
by GORDON
PJ says he won't be directing.
http://www.mania.com/56965.html
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:02 pm
by GORDON
Ian McKellen is more than happy to return as Gandalf... but director Guillermo Del Toro hasn't asked him yet...
http://www.mania.com/ian-mck....38.html
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:13 pm
by Malcolm
Guillermo seems like type of dude that'd bow to the fanbase on this one. After seeing Ian's excellent portrayal in the trilogy, it'd be kinda weird seeing anyone besides him pull off Mithrandir.
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:22 pm
by GORDON
Too bad Del Toro wasn't available for the last Harry Potter movie.
But I have high hopes for the next Hellboy because of him.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:01 pm
by Leisher
But I have high hopes for the next Hellboy because of him.
We saw the previews prior to Cloverfield and the wife was NOT impressed. She thought the film looked ridiculously insulting to the intelligence. She kept mocking Hellboy's final line in the trailer. She kept saying that crap is the best they can come up with?
I have to agree it seemed much cheesier than the original film.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:11 pm
by GORDON
The "Aw crap" line? That was from the original. It's what he says.
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:31 pm
by Malcolm
If they give Hellboy enough screen time, Ron Perlman's got the character down well enough such that it might not totally suck.
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:09 pm
by GORDON
Of The Bull wants to use less CGI than did Peter Jackson. Good.
http://chud.com/article....e1.html
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:06 pm
by Malcolm
Less CGI usually means more reliance on ingenuity. That being said, I hope Smaug still looks something like this...

Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 9:19 pm
by GORDON
20 questions with Jackson and Of the Bull.
http://www.wetanz.com/holics/index.php?itemid=695&catid=2
Lots more than 20, though, with follow-ups.
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 10:31 pm
by Malcolm
4K questions lodged prior to the chat & another one question lodged literally every second of the chat's duration. Fuckin' hell. Reminds me of the old UO HoC chats.
Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:34 am
by GORDON
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 12:07 pm
by GORDON
Del Toro has a few words.
http://www.mania.com/del-tor....99.html
Sounds so far, so good. He didn't say anything like, "We're really putting in so much humor... it's great" like Dan'l Radcliff said about the next Harry Potter some time back. More like, "I'm trying to get my head in the same place that Tolkein's was at when he wrote it so I can get the same vibe." That's a good thing to hear.
Edited By GORDON on 1223222932
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 8:04 pm
by GORDON
Gandalf, Elrond, and Gollum reprising their rolls.
http://www.mania.com/hobbit-....31.html
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:56 pm
by Leisher
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:18 pm
by Leisher
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 8:40 pm
by Malcolm
Why are they waiting on greenlighting a flick that's damn near certain to be a huge cash cow?
Posted: Mon May 31, 2010 9:00 pm
by GORDON
Son of a fuck. That is a mother bitch.
Maybe with Jackon's recent bombs, he'll go back to The Hobbit to get "back on top."
Just as long as he gets rid of the woman who added so much silliness into Return of the King. I'm looking at you, scene where Legolas slides down the oliphant trunk Fred Flintstone-style.
I read that one of his female co-writers was personally responsible for a lot of the stuff the fans hated in the films. Can't remember which.
That being said, I don't know if attaching Jackson to the flick is entirely good.
Edited By GORDON on 1275396601