Page 9 of 72
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:24 pm
by Malcolm
Eh, overhunting/overfishing seems to be a result of stupidity more than anything else. And we've killed numerous species in the name of progress or cos they got in the way. I just consider that one species encroaching on another's turf successfully. But yeah, we've probably hunted a few things just cos we thought they needed to be wiped off the planet.
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 3:58 pm
by GORDON
Like Polio.
"A" for effort, anyway.
Edited By GORDON on 1209585543
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:48 pm
by Malcolm
GORDON wrote:Like Polio.
"A" for effort, anyway.
All things being said, how many species has man killed? How many went extinct without any help from man whatsoever?
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2008 4:53 pm
by GORDON
No... no... there is an all-pervasive Earth-Presence named Gaia, and She created humans as a way to understand herself... so technically, man doesn't kill anything. It's all part of Gaia's plan and humanity is just a puppet in the overall scheme of things.
- BTW, I didn't mean '"A" for effort' toward you, I meant that we get an "A" for effort for "eradicating" polio, because I think it may be popping up again due to hippie parents not getting their kids innoculated over autism fears.
Posted: Thu May 01, 2008 2:21 am
by TPRJones
Malcolm wrote:All things being said, how many species has man killed? How many went extinct without any help from man whatsoever?
Man has directly wiped out a few dozen species, if you discount the differences between the Blue Spotted Blind Cave Lizard and the Teal Spotted Bline Cave Lizard and crap like that.
Nature has wiped out many many many many many many more. Far more species were extint before we ever came along than are around currently. It's a natural byproduct of evolution, after all.
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:40 pm
by GORDON
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages....id=1770
Global warming will be "put on hold" over the next decade because of natural climate variations, scientists claim.
A study of sea temperature changes predicts a lull as traditional climate cycles cancel out the heating effect of greenhouse gases from pollution.
The findings suggest the official models used to predict short-term global warming patterns are too crude.
But the argument is over. We're past the point of no return. The consensus agrees. Please buy Carbon Credits.
"That emphasises the need to consider climate variability and climate change together when making predictions over timescales of decades."
DUH......... YA THINK???
The Met Office believes 2008 will be slightly cooler than last year. But the last ten years remain the warmest decade in recent human history.
"Recent human history" meaning the last 10 or 100 years, of course. Nevermind the planet has been much warmer within the last 10k years. I blame Bush and fuel inefficient SUV's that were around in 7000 B.C.
Posted: Thu Jul 17, 2008 11:01 pm
by GORDON
Former member of "The Consensus" realizes the "theory" is falling apart.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story....00.html
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:24 am
by GORDON
Should change the name of this thread to "...full of Bullshit!"
Penn & Teller on environmental hysteria.
Penn and Teller - Bullshit! - Environmental Hysteria<br/><object width="425px" height="360px" ><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"/><param name="movie" value="http://mediaservices.myspace.com/servic ... o"/><embed src="http://mediaservices.myspace.com/servic ... 1,mt=video" width="425" height="360" allowFullScreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"></embed></object>
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:50 am
by Leisher
This thread never gets old.
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 1:58 am
by Leisher
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 6:30 pm
by Malcolm
Start working on shrinking nuclear reactors. Let's take the fucking gloves off.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 2:46 pm
by Leisher
Why storms are getting "worse".
If climate change is having an effect on the intensities of storms, it's not obvious in the historical weather data. And whatever effect it is having is much, much smaller than the effect of development along the coastlines.
You know, it bugs me that places like Yahoo will publish articles like this yet also publish articles making claims that "global warming is making storms worse". Is there any journalistic integrity left anymore?
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:35 pm
by TPRJones
Leisher wrote:Is there any journalistic integrity left anymore?
None.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:39 pm
by GORDON
The morning after Palin's speech, the AP had a line-by-line "fact-checking" of everything she said. I didn't bother with it, but I have seen it cut-and-pasted all over the place.
It is amazing that now is the time the AP decides to start checking facts, and they pulled an all-nighter to do it. I question the timing. To my knowledge they've never checked a fact in the entire time they have existed.
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 4:58 pm
by Leisher
To my knowledge they've never checked a fact in the entire time they have existed.
I, as some of you know, have actually worked for the MSM and during that time I never knew of anyone who checked facts or apologized when they got something wrong.
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:30 pm
by GORDON
Al Gore fired global warming skeptic. "Science will not intrude on public policy."
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=13773
In 1991, Happer was appointed director of energy research for the US Department of Energy. In 1993, he testified before Congress that the scientific data didn't support widespread fears about the dangers of the ozone hole and global warming, remarks that caused then-Vice President Al Gore to fire him. "I was told that science was not going to intrude on public policy", he said. "I did not need the job that badly".
I'm telling you people... when the Supreme Court ruled against Al Gore in 2000, Al Gore snapped and went super villain. The Global Warming movement is his payback on this country.
Edited By GORDON on 1230075035
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:49 am
by Vince
Give it a little more time. As more and more credible scientists come out saying the data doesn't prove what they're saying it does and the movement is discredited, Gore will really go off the deep end.
This winter can't be helping his mood much. I'm pretty sure all the people stuck in airports out west are pretty much saying ol' Al can suck it.
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 1:10 am
by Malcolm
Vince wrote:Give it a little more time. As more and more credible scientists come out saying the data doesn't prove what they're saying it does and the movement is discredited, Gore will really go off the deep end.
Yeah. Cos nothing changes popular opinion like lack of scientific evidence. Which is why millions of people probably now think Jesus had a Merovingian descendant.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:18 am
by Leisher
You know all those dramatic shots of ice melting in Antarctica and how this trend really has the global warming nazis freaking out?
Well as it turns out, the ice in Antarctica is GROWING.
A paper to be published soon by the British Antarctic Survey in the journal Geophysical Research Letters is expected to confirm that over the past 30 years, the area of sea ice around the continent has expanded.
See, the western portion of the continent has the melting issue, but the eastern side is freezing faster than the western side is melting.
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:23 am
by Leisher
More global warming news today:
Fat people cause global warming.
This has to be devastating to anyone overweight who actively works to fight "global warming". They just lost all credibility.
The government must be thrilled though since this will give them all the ammunition they need to pass laws regulating our weight.