Page 63 of 76

Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:23 pm
by TPRJones
Nah, I think they'll forget about this guy before they get to the point where they do that.

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:29 pm
by thibodeaux

Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:32 pm
by GORDON
thibodeaux wrote:hah
That's... sexist.

Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:16 am
by GORDON
Obama peeps: we are keeping the venues at our rallies partially filled, on purpose.

http://m.washingtontimes.com/blog....owd-siz

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:24 am
by Leisher
I'm sure you heard about the SEALs and other agencies making an ad bashing Obama's administration for leaking national secrets for political gain.

Some asshat called them cowards.

Cowards. He called the SEALs cowards.

If they're cowards for calling out the president's administration for putting American lives at risk, and the lives of their allies, just to give Obama a boost in the polls, then what does that say about Obama's administration?

Anyway, the SEALs responded.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:46 pm
by Leisher
[url=http://www.theblaze.com/stories/electoral-college-model-predicts-romney-will-win-big-in-2012-and-its-been-right-since-1980 /]Romney wins the election in a landslide.[/url]

According to this election model, which hasn't been wrong since 1980.

Sadly, this will probably be the year it's wrong.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:50 pm
by GORDON
You know who typically don't get polled? Attractive and successful people. And they are going 95% Obama, and whatever ACORN is calling themselves these days will make sure they get to the polls to vote, at least once.



Edited By GORDON on 1345755071

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:54 pm
by Leisher
You know who else doesn't get polled? Republicans.



Edited By Leisher on 1345768672

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:24 pm
by GORDON
Leisher wrote:You know who else don't get polled? Republicans.
I'm getting 2 damned calls a day, either for polling, or Romney wanting more money.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:31 pm
by TheCatt
I don't get poled, but my wife does.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:36 pm
by GORDON
TheCatt wrote:I don't get poled, but my wife does.
I know.

Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:20 pm
by Malcolm
Leisher wrote:[url=http://www.theblaze.com/stories/electoral-college-model-predicts-romney-will-win-big-in-2012-and-its-been-right-since-1980 /]Romney wins the election in a landslide.[/url]

According to this election model, which hasn't been wrong since 1980.

Sadly, this will probably be the year it's wrong.
I just can't see him running a less stupid campaign than his opponent.

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 2:23 pm
by Leisher
Zero percent of black people support Romney.

Odd that the MSM hasn't run with this and drafted all sorts of side articles about how racism is still alive in America, and how ignorance reigns supreme in these voters' hearts.

Way to support the party that wanted to keep you enslaved black people.




Edited By Leisher on 1345832682

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:20 pm
by Leisher
I hate shit like this...

I know both sides do it.

Taking a hero of not just Americans, but human beings and turning his death into a political ad is beyond fucking disgusting.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:28 am
by Leisher

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 9:37 am
by thibodeaux
If the ban is ordered, it would likely come via executive order rather than an attempt to have Congress pass legislation.

Thank God we got rid of those Kings.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 10:02 am
by GORDON
If a ban on recreational fishing were to take hold, one would suspect that a ban on recreational hunting would not be far behind. Environmental groups have been trying to stop hunting for decades and now seem to have an administration willing to do their bidding.


1. If they banned hunting, large chunks of the United States are going to have a serious deer overpopulation problem.

2. If they ban hunting and fishing, all of a sudden whatever funds that exist that pay for preservation of wetlands/whatever are going to be seriously devoid of funds... a lot of land stewardship is paid for by those fees and licenses... but I guess that is nothing that another executive order tax can't fix.


If you ever want to read a nightmarish book novel about what happens when the Greens finally get control of the country, read "Fallen Angels" by... Niven? Pournelle? I forget which. Because of that book whenever I see a picture of the St. Louis Arch I can't help but picture physicists being hanged from it.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:11 am
by TPRJones
GORDON wrote:"Fallen Angels" by... Niven? Pournelle? I forget which.
Both. And I keep being reminded of that book constantly these days.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 11:28 am
by GORDON
TPRJones wrote:
GORDON wrote:"Fallen Angels" by... Niven? Pournelle? I forget which.
Both. And I keep being reminded of that book constantly these days.
It is also why I don't trust "smart" electricity meters.

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:25 pm
by TheCatt
Hey... smart meters pay my bills.