MS Word illegal?

Post Reply
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

What the fuck? I'm betting $20 this gets overturned.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Top
User avatar
Troy
Posts: 7568
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:00 am

Post by Troy »

Did I read correctly that the ruling says "Open source formats can be copyrighted"?



Wait... what.
Top
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:
Contact TPRJones

Post by TPRJones »

No, the patent is from 1994, before those particular formats came to be. While it seems absurd on the face of it, there may actually be some merit to i4i's case. Must read more.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Top
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:
Contact TPRJones

Post by TPRJones »

Hmmmm ... so essentially they patented the use of SGML (and thus XML) as an integral part of a document editing package. I'm not sure that there's programs doing that prior to the 1994 patent. If one can be found it would invalidate the patent, I think.

The patent is actually a bit more generic, covering any method of keeping text and formatting separate in a documenting editing program. Given the prior existence of SGML for nearly 20 years, even if no one had done this before I'm not really sure it counts as "non-obvious".
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
Top
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

Takedown, two points.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Tech stuff”