It exaggerates, but there's some truth.Marshall has not prosecuted anyone for providing abortion assistance, but he has made statements saying that his office would “look at” groups that provide help.
“Attorney General Marshall will continue to vigorously enforce Alabama laws protecting unborn life which include the Human Life Protection Act. That includes abortion providers conspiring to violate the Act,” Marshall’s office said in an emailed response to the lawsuit. His office did not respond to an email asking to clarify if actions such as providing financial assistance could be prosecuted.
The Democratic Party
The Democratic Party
https://apnews.com/article/idaho-aborti ... 372885ad5a
It's not me, it's someone else.
The Democratic Party
Just so we're clear, one had better not pluralize something when it clearly shouldn't be, and that's a crossed line worth arguing over, but "exaggerating" that cops are going to illegally pull over women and make them pee on a stick is ok?
That is one hell of a moving bar...
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
The Democratic Party
My positions are consistent. "The hosts of The View" when really it was "1 host, immediately corrected by 2 other hosts" is grossly misrepresentational. The entire conclusion of the video was "oh yeah, that's bullshit" when the headline was "THEY ARE ALL CRAZY"
A few conservative states are definitely exploring ways to punish people leaving the state, or people helping them, for abortion. Thus, actual basis in fact. Despite the pee stick part.
It's not me, it's someone else.
The Democratic Party
I think you know I was just having some fun with you and perhaps you're trolling me back, but before you think I'm attacking you, let me 'splain. Generally, yes, you are consistent. I think we all are and when opinions have changed or we're undecided we've spoken up about it. No one should want to be so rigid that their opinions cannot change.
On that note, I disagree with your explanation. Sorry.
Calling out the entire cast of The View is absolutely understandable considering that show is nothing but left wing propaganda. Anytime they have anyone right leaning on they either throw them off the show, pester them until they leave, or these same hosts storm off/refuse to participate. There is no one credible on the show. They all say bigoted, biased, and/or ignorant shit on a day to day basis. Thus, actual basis in fact.
Showing a women getting pulled over without cause, then being forced to piss on a stick before being arrested is grossly misrepresentational, and that's being nice about it. There are multiple Constitutional violations taking place in that ad and so far you haven't shown me anyone saying anything remotely like "We're going to pull you over and commit unlawful search and seizures. Fuck the Constitution."
And that's not to say that politicians from both parties don't try to circumvent the Constitution on a daily basis. They do and they will continue to do so for as long as we have one. Which probably won't be much longer.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
The Democratic Party
Women have different personalities from one day to the next. It's science.
Therefore, one woman could be technically referred to in the plural.
Therefore, one woman could be technically referred to in the plural.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
The Democratic Party
You're generalizing something whereas the statement was specific, and incorrect. You're not evaluating this situation on its own, but rather getting distracted by your prior conclusion.
It's at least symbolically accurate, as opposed to the other statement.
It's not me, it's someone else.
The Democratic Party
No sir. I was just explaining how I can understand someone generalizing all the hosts of that show when one says something stupid because it happens daily. Pick a host and you can find YouTube compilations of them saying racist, sexist, and/or bigoted shit.
It's blatant fear mongering. And while I'll give you symbolically accurate, it doesn't excuse or justify it.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
The Democratic Party
Fetterman comes out against lab grown meat.
Fetterman has no patience for the anti-Israel idiots.
Get this guy on the fucking presidential ballot already!
Fetterman has no patience for the anti-Israel idiots.
Get this guy on the fucking presidential ballot already!
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
The Democratic Party
This law is dumb. You can agree not to eat it, or buy it, or maybe have it labeled, but prohibition is wrong.
It's not me, it's someone else.
The Democratic Party
Agree, except for the "maybe have it labeled". It absolutely MUST be labeled.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”