Climate Change (fka man-made global warming)

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
Post Reply
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Debate in this area is great.

Certainty, for now, is bullshit.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Oops, our bad, 1998 WASN'T the warmest year on record.

In fact, 5 of the last 10 warmest years occurred before World War II.

- NASA

Obviously the Bush White House is just pressuring the scientists again, so it's prolly all fake and the truth will only come out with Hillary in the White House.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 70349
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Leisher »

"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

First comment:
Posted by: greenbeen77
What a judas this guy turned out to be...but it was to be expected. Im sure he's not the first or last to be bought out by the interests of big oil...if judas betrayed Jesus crist just as easy why wouldn't these MIT dorks do the same?

Good goddamn. Elvis has left the building. Goodnight, everybody.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Told you it was a religion.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
thibodeaux
Posts: 8120
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm

Post by thibodeaux »

TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by TPRJones »

I am forced to comment on this news story about Al Gore- what fascinates me is not that there were purportedly special effects in “An Inconvenient Truth” (which I doubt), but that you cling to the concept that global climate change is not a reality.


More proof it's a religion.

Did he not watch the video, or does he think they are flat out lying? Or maybe The Day After Tomorrow stole the shot from Al Gore a few years before An Inconvenient Truth was made? That must be it.
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57576
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

So the flyover was fake. So?
It's not me, it's someone else.
thibodeaux
Posts: 8120
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 7:32 pm

Post by thibodeaux »

TheCatt wrote:So the flyover was fake. So?
Good point: the whole movie is bullshit anyway.
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by TPRJones »

TheCatt wrote:So the flyover was fake. So?
I agree that that is irrelivant. I just like the irony in someone grumbling about how people are unable to look at the "facts" of global warming and see it for the clearly proven rational arguement that it (supposedly) is, yet at the same time see that vid and say "special effects in 'An Inconvenient Truth' (which I doubt)."

Pot kettle much?
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57576
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

TPRJones wrote:
TheCatt wrote:So the flyover was fake. So?
I agree that that is irrelivant. I just like the irony in someone grumbling about how people are unable to look at the "facts" of global warming and see it for the clearly proven rational arguement that it (supposedly) is, yet at the same time see that vid and say "special effects in 'An Inconvenient Truth' (which I doubt)."

Pot kettle much?
Well, that idiot is a whole different story.
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

Hurricane expert is skeptical about global warming.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353023,00.html

Remember Al Gore's consensus? I wonder how much money he made last week selling carbon credits.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57576
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

So, consensus, what exactly does that mean?
1) An opinion or position reached by a group as a whole:
2) General agreement or accord

#1 implies ALL scientists agree.
#2, to me, implies MOST agree.

Am I interpreting those correctly?
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

If you ever find yourself agreeing with the majority of people, it's time to stop and have some quiet reflection about your life.

Gore specifically stated that anyone who disagrees with him is a nutjob. He has stated that all serious scientists agree with him. A lot of people who would otherwise be considered serious, non-nutjobs have spoken out against Gore's movement. Al Gore makes money off of his global warming movement, and does not personally live a "green" lifestyle if his so-called and dubious carbon opffsets are taken out of that equation. Far from it.

But, like with Obama, some people will believe anything if they want it to be true badly enough.

Or were you just being argumentative?
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 57576
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Post by TheCatt »

I was really just asking for clarification or other people's opinion on the latter definition as to what "general" meant.

General, like most, or general like "about most aspects, except some details"
It's not me, it's someone else.
TPRJones
Posts: 13418
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 2:05 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Post by TPRJones »

I think the conotation with the word consensus is that most (not all, but at least on the approximate order of 90%) agree with most (same stipulation) of the statement. A mere 51% is too weak for the word consensus, I would think.

The denotation, however, is not so specific. And it's clear that those using it about global warming are using it to mean all - or at least all those that agree with them, because the rest are clearly crazy and do not count.




Edited By TPRJones on 1209535058
"ATTENTION: Customers browsing porn must hold magazines with both hands at all times!"
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

He also said "Is there still an argument about this?"
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Malcolm
Posts: 32040
Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 1:04 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Post by Malcolm »

GORDON wrote:He also said "Is there still an argument about this?"
People like believing doomsday prophecies. I'm damn near convinced most of us have a built-in inferiority complex.

David Koresh knew this. Nostradamus knew this. Marshall Applewhite knew this. Jim Jones knew this. Now, am I suggesting that everyone who believes in global warming is actively deceiving those who don't? Nah.

But c'mon, this is the same planet that's had species killed off en masse thruout its existence. In that light, it's not hard to believe that humankind could be killed by a catastrophe event of epic proportions. Of course, every critter that's gone extinct has done so as a result of natural phenomenon. The dinosaurs didn't kill themselves. The Permian extinction wasn't artificially made.

In short, most people don't take into account how incredibly old this sphere is & the scale of the punishment it's taken in its life. Our knowledge of how things really work is partial at best. Is it possible humans are affecting the climate of the entire globe? Eh, maybe. It's nigh impossible to answer with a definitive, "No." But the worst people could do to this place pales in comparison w\ what's already happened to it. All this being said, humans could certainly make themselves go extinct, which would be a damn fine case to nature never to create sentient, self-aware life again.
Diogenes of Sinope: "It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC: "Better dead than smeg."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 70349
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Post by Leisher »

Of course, every critter that's gone extinct has done so as a result of natural phenomenon.


That's not entirely accurate. Are the actions of another species considered "natural phenomenon"?

Man has been responsible both directly and indirectly for certain species' extinction or near extinction.

Man hunted buffaloes, wolves, bears, etc. to near extinction. Ditto for whales.

Man brought species with him around the globe resulting in the extinction of other species. Ask the dodo bird.

Not saying man is the ultimate evil, but we are the only species on the planet that has goals other than fucking and eating. We invent, travel, trade, build, etc. Even in those peaceful actions, we can kill and not even intentionally.

Hippies simply need to suck it up and realize that fact.
"Happy slaves are the worst enemies of freedom." - Marie Von Ebner
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies..." - Orwell
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 56735
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Post by GORDON »

First thing I thought of was "wooly mammoth."
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Post Reply