Cuties

As long as we recognize Lucas is washed up and most TV sucks, we'll all get along fine.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65595
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Cuties

Post by Leisher »

My wife and I discussed this show tonight. She listened to Netflix's "just watch it" and tried. She shut it off halfway through. She said it's crazy disgusting.

She said an 11 year old girl does the WAP dance for grown men who are security guards. It was so she could get out of trouble or something. If that's the lesson you want to teach your girls, I guess no issue, right?

She also said there was nudity involving the kids. TV-MA or not, that's supposed to be illegal.

I also didn't know this was a movie and not a documentary.

My wife is a dance mom. Three daughters who have all danced for various studios and theater companies. She's not a bible thumper. She is shocked Netflix thinks this film is fine.

I guess, at the very least, Netflix should have edited out the nudity.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54553
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Cuties

Post by GORDON »

I couldn't finish watching "Big Mouth." Turned it off during the naked kid locker room dance.

I don't think anyone should be cancelled because it offended my delicate sensibilities.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65595
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Cuties

Post by Leisher »

A cartoon is vastly different from actual kids being undressed and sexualized in a movie.

It's like that case we discussed a few years back about the guy in Southern Ohio who wrote erotic stories for pedos. He was arrested for it, but as he wasn't actually hurting anyone everyone here disagreed with the arrest. He's not someone you should hire to babysit, but he really did nothing illegal.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53970
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Cuties

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: A cartoon is vastly different from actual kids being undressed and sexualized in a movie.
The film is French. When I was in Italy last (a while ago), I remember seeing lots of prepubescent kids just running around naked at the beach. Or pre-pubescent girls just wearing bottoms, not tops, since they had no boobs. It wasn't sexualized, just normal. But, it was weird to me.

I dunno.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65595
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Cuties

Post by Leisher »

I can excuse cultural differences in regards to what the director included.

Those differences do not excuse Netflix releasing the film in the States without editing that stuff out.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53970
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Cuties

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: I can excuse cultural differences in regards to what the director included.

Those differences do not excuse Netflix releasing the film in the States without editing that stuff out.
So we're the Taliban now?
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65595
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Cuties

Post by Leisher »

TheCatt wrote: So we're the Taliban now?
When it comes to getting children naked, yes.

I see prepubescent kids running around nude at beaches and lakes too. I get it. There's nothing wrong with that. However, they're not 10 or 11, they're 1-5.

Also, playing at the beach is pretty different from being in a movie where you're intentionally being sexualized.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65595
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Cuties

Post by Leisher »

Netflix has been indicted in Texas over Cuties.

I mean if a movie sexualizing children and featuring nude shots of children isn't child porn, what is?
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
User avatar
Troy
Posts: 7241
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:00 am

Cuties

Post by Troy »

It's super gross. Other countries (France and the ME, for starters) are culturally very different in their treatment of young children. But that shit doesn't fly in the USA.

I saw enough of the scenes that Netflix is going to get fucked for this in the US.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54553
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Cuties

Post by GORDON »

This is the last time I will defend this movie.... I fucking hate having to defend unpopular speech. But, unpopular speech is the only type that needs to be protected, isn't it.

An image of naked kids isn't illegal, child pornography is illegal. Some court will have to prove that this movie is intended to be pornographic. I do not believe that, ultimately, they will succeed in proving this. The writer and director has literally gone on the record and made her argument, and it's very believable.

And there were zero naked kids in this movie, anyway.

That is all I have to say about it.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53970
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Cuties

Post by TheCatt »

GORDON wrote: And there were zero naked kids in this movie, anyway.
I thought leisher said otherwise? Like a topless prepube girl?
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54553
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Cuties

Post by GORDON »

Topless ain't naked.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65595
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Cuties

Post by Leisher »

GORDON wrote:Topless ain't naked.
A toddler running on the beach topless isn't offensive or exploitative. Showing the asses and breasts of child actors in a film whose entire purpose is to sexualize children to show that it's a problem is 100% inappropriate nudity.

This isn't an unpopular speech issue.

The issue is the director should have made a documentary about the sexual exploitation of children instead of sexually exploiting children to make this fictional movie. Make this a documentary and blur any sort of nudity and it sends the proper message. Then only the religious right would be complaining about it.

Also, naked images of children can absolutely be illegal even if the photo is innocent. A picture of someone's kids in the tub is innocent. That same picture on Subway Jared's hard drive makes it sexual and illegal.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
Post Reply