California - Because it needs its own thread

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54400
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by GORDON »

You know what would solve.the homeless problem? Bulldozers and bonfires.

Nothing else,.short of magic, is going to.stop.it.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53729
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by TheCatt »

GORDON wrote: You know what would solve.the homeless problem? Bulldozers and bonfires.

Nothing else,.short of magic, is going to.stop.it.
Sounds like a pretty final solution
It's not me, it's someone else.
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54400
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by GORDON »

Hugs and money are only watering the weed. A final solution is needed, but will never come, and the entire tree of humanity will suffer more and more under the burden of.more and more dead branches.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Vince
Posts: 8619
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Vince »

When you subsidize something, you get more of it.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65258
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Leisher »

A school in SF is going to spend $600K painting over a mural of George Washington.

Why? Because it has traumatized kids, and the SJWs behind this proved it by providing exactly zero examples of traumatized kids. In reality, polled kids at the school wanted the mural to stay or didn't give a fuck one way or the other.

Read the article about the original intent of the piece, and it gets interesting.

The SJWs also claimed it offends Native Americans, yet when a Native American in attendance at whatever meeting was held said it didn't and she didn't want the mural removed, she was ignored.

When the "snapback" happens in this country, it's going to get bloody.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54400
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by GORDON »

Read today that some UN person visited San Fran and said the squalor reminded her of Calcutta.

I should have linked it.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
Vince
Posts: 8619
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Vince »

We really need a biblical disaster.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 54400
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by GORDON »

Here it is.

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch ... and-manila

Granted, I just noticed the source.
"Be bold, and mighty forces will come to your aid."
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53729
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by TheCatt »

GORDON wrote: Here it is.

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/arch ... and-manila

Granted, I just noticed the source.
I have a custom HOSTS file that removes a lot of advertising/spam/hacker DNS entries. That blog is already in the list, so I cannot read it.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65258
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Leisher »

Did I mention that part of the reason removing the mural will cost so much is because they're required by state law to do an environmental impact study before fucking painting?
This is why the Democrats entire platform is based upon social issues. When it comes to economics they are worse than the Republicans, and that's really saying something.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65258
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Leisher »

Earthquakes hitting Cali.

You doing all right out there Troy?
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53729
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Earthquakes hitting Cali.

You doing all right out there Troy?
Troy's pretty far north from those, no?
It's not me, it's someone else.
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53729
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by TheCatt »

Image
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65258
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Leisher »

The hedgehog's a legend.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
User avatar
Troy
Posts: 7156
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 8:00 am

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Troy »

All good, didn't even feel anything. A couple states over, by east coast standards.
Vince
Posts: 8619
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Vince »

"This whole gay marriage thing is going to lead to the attempt to normalize pedophilia."

"You're a ridiculous homophobe!"

CA Democrats Author Bill to Protect Sex Offenders Who Lure Minors
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53729
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by TheCatt »

Vince wrote: "This whole gay marriage thing is going to lead to the attempt to normalize pedophilia."

"You're a ridiculous homophobe!"

CA Democrats Author Bill to Protect Sex Offenders Who Lure Minors
Yes, you are being a ridiculous homophobe. The bill is to equalize oral/anal consensual minor-sex (statutory rape) with vaginal consensual minor-sex (statutory rape). We can certainly argue about how that should be treated, but I see no reason that oral/anal would be treated differently from vaginal.

The bill would make it so that the judge would have discretion of the sex offender registry, instead of being automatic. I would think a conservative, libertarian-leaning person would approve of not punishing people beyond their crime + time (sex offender registries), but maybe I misunderstand.
It's not me, it's someone else.
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 65258
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Leisher »

TheCatt wrote: The bill is to equalize oral/anal consensual minor-sex (statutory rape) with vaginal consensual minor-sex (statutory rape). We can certainly argue about how that should be treated, but I see no reason that oral/anal would be treated differently from vaginal.
Fine with that.
TheCatt wrote: The bill would make it so that the judge would have discretion of the sex offender registry, instead of being automatic.
Not fine with that.

The 10 year stipulation is rather fucked up. Call me crazy, but 20 years olds don't need to have sex with 10 year olds. Judges certainly don't need a loophole to not punish them or have them register as a sex offender.

People caught pissing outside, an 18-19 year old that sleeps with a 16 year old, someone who gets seen naked by a neighbor, etc. shouldn't need to register as sex offenders. That 10 year rule is really fucked up. I don't know how anyone thought that was a good cut off. 18-8 is the low end 15-25 is the high end. I'm not ok with either of those.
TheCatt wrote: I would think a conservative, libertarian-leaning person would approve of not punishing people beyond their crime + time (sex offender registries), but maybe I misunderstand.
IMHO, if you're 18 and you get caught fucking an 8 year old, the only reasonable and fair punishment is death.
“Every record been destroyed or falsified, books rewritten, pictures repainted, statues, street building renamed, every date altered. The process is continuing day by day. History stops. Nothing exists except endless present in which the Party is right.”
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 53729
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by TheCatt »

Leisher wrote: Not fine with that.

The 10 year stipulation is rather fucked up. Call me crazy, but 20 years olds don't need to have sex with 10 year olds. Judges certainly don't need a loophole to not punish them or have them register as a sex offender.
...
I don't know how anyone thought that was a good cut off. 18-8 is the low end 15-25 is the high end. I'm not ok with either of those.
The bill does not allow for that discretion for victims who are 10 or 8 years old. It's for teens who are 15 to 17 only. So 15-25 is covered (sketchy), but also 15-18 (Reasonable)
It's not me, it's someone else.
Vince
Posts: 8619
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

California - Because it needs its own thread

Post by Vince »

Leisher wrote:
TheCatt wrote: The bill would make it so that the judge would have discretion of the sex offender registry, instead of being automatic.
Not fine with that.

The 10 year stipulation is rather fucked up. Call me crazy, but 20 years olds don't need to have sex with 10 year olds. Judges certainly don't need a loophole to not punish them or have them register as a sex offender.

People caught pissing outside, an 18-19 year old that sleeps with a 16 year old, someone who gets seen naked by a neighbor, etc. shouldn't need to register as sex offenders. That 10 year rule is really fucked up. I don't know how anyone thought that was a good cut off. 18-8 is the low end 15-25 is the high end. I'm not ok with either of those.
This. I'm A-OK with tightening the laws up so that the sex isn't discriminatory between hetero and homo. Not okay with just taking it to the lowest common denominator to do it.
"... and then I was forced to walk the Trail of Tears." - Elizabeth Warren
Post Reply