Victoria's Secret

Stuff we should click on.  Be sure to state Not Work Safe, if applicable.  KTHX.
User avatar
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 34670
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Victoria's Secret

Postby TheCatt » Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:27 pm

People are fat and don't look good in VS' clothes.
It's not me, it's someone else.

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:14 am

TheCatt wrote:Source of the post People are fat and don't look good in VS' clothes.


Yep, and that's not the lazy fat person's fault, that's Victoria's Secret's fault...
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 45089
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby GORDON » Thu Jul 18, 2019 8:04 pm

Lace isn't really intended to be load bearing.
Fuuuuuuck YOU.

User avatar
Vince
Posts: 7946
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Victoria's Secret

Postby Vince » Fri Jul 19, 2019 6:21 am

Lingerie in general sees to have kind of faded out. Looking at porn from the 80's and 90's compared to today, the sexy underwear has almost disappeared. Now you see it in the nude photo-shoots, but I don't see it like I used to in other places. I don't think we seduce like we used to.

User avatar
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 34670
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Victoria's Secret

Postby TheCatt » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:14 am

Vince wrote:Source of the post Lingerie in general sees to have kind of faded out. Looking at porn from the 80's and 90's compared to today, the sexy underwear has almost disappeared. Now you see it in the nude photo-shoots, but I don't see it like I used to in other places. I don't think we seduce like we used to.

dtf?
It's not me, it's someone else.

User avatar
Vince
Posts: 7946
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Victoria's Secret

Postby Vince » Fri Jul 19, 2019 9:22 am

Right.

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Fri Jul 19, 2019 12:16 pm

Vince wrote:Source of the post Lingerie in general sees to have kind of faded out. Looking at porn from the 80's and 90's compared to today, the sexy underwear has almost disappeared. Now you see it in the nude photo-shoots, but I don't see it like I used to in other places. I don't think we seduce like we used to.


This is actually a phenomenal point, and I declare you the winner of the internet today.
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 45089
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby GORDON » Fri Jul 19, 2019 1:41 pm

Even back then, lingerie was nice for like the first 5 minutes. That chick's getting stripped.
Fuuuuuuck YOU.

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:15 pm

Would you rather receive:
-A photo from a woman wearing, say, stockings, a garter belt, and panties.
OR
-A photo from the same woman that's just a shot of her beaver.

One of those things is about the subtle art of seduction. It makes you anticipate what will happen next and what deliciousness those items accentuate while hiding. It gives the woman POWER.

The other is about "Yeah, I have one of those things you can see in about two clicks on the internet. You know what to do with it. It's the only thing I have that's valuable."

Seriously, in this era of female empowerment lingerie sales should be on the rise. Kind of proves that the majority of women just cannot wrap their heads around how to get a man and keep him happy. No wonder the divorce rate keeps climbing.
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 45089
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby GORDON » Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:21 pm

Livestock does not look good in lingerie. :-D
Fuuuuuuck YOU.

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:22 pm

GORDON wrote:Source of the post Livestock does not look good in lingerie. :-D


No it does not, but that also makes a point about people not trying to look good for each other anymore.
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 34670
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Victoria's Secret

Postby TheCatt » Fri Jul 19, 2019 2:41 pm

Leisher wrote:Source of the post No wonder the divorce rate keeps climbing.

Actually.....
[B]y 1979, the rate was 5.3 per 1,000 American, with 1,193,062 divorces that year. After an all-time high in the '70s, divorces in the 1980s seemed to slow down. In 1980, the rate was 5.2 divorces per 1,000 people, and by 1989, it had dropped to 4.7.
...
By 2010, the rate of divorces dropped to 3.6 for every 1,000 people, and in 2017 the rate reached 2.9 with only 787,251 divorces — the lowest it's been since 1968.
It's not me, it's someone else.

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:01 pm

TheCatt wrote:Source of the post
Leisher wrote:Source of the post No wonder the divorce rate keeps climbing.

Actually.....
[B]y 1979, the rate was 5.3 per 1,000 American, with 1,193,062 divorces that year. After an all-time high in the '70s, divorces in the 1980s seemed to slow down. In 1980, the rate was 5.2 divorces per 1,000 people, and by 1989, it had dropped to 4.7.
...
By 2010, the rate of divorces dropped to 3.6 for every 1,000 people, and in 2017 the rate reached 2.9 with only 787,251 divorces — the lowest it's been since 1968.


Good for us!

Do you think it's because we're getting better at marriage or because divorce usually cripples the man, and thus, it's easier to just ride it out until the kids are gone?
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 34670
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Victoria's Secret

Postby TheCatt » Fri Jul 19, 2019 4:11 pm

Leisher wrote:Source of the post Do you think it's because we're getting better at marriage or because divorce usually cripples the man, and thus, it's easier to just ride it out until the kids are gone?

I think it's because people are getting choosier at marriage. Marriage rates are also falling. I think I read that divorce:marriage rates are still falling too, though.
It's not me, it's someone else.

User avatar
Vince
Posts: 7946
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 10:00 pm
Location: In bed with your mom

Victoria's Secret

Postby Vince » Fri Jul 19, 2019 7:50 pm

I think things happen in cycles as well. I have no doubt that the "free love" and promiscuity contributed to the divorce rate. I think younger people are approaching both sex and relationships differently. Almost like they're being "rebels".

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Sat Jul 20, 2019 1:59 pm

I do know studies have shown younger people are having less sex and with fewer partners than we did.
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 45089
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby GORDON » Sat Jul 20, 2019 6:38 pm

It's because I'm single now and hogging all the women.

Not "hogging." Keeping all of them busy.
Fuuuuuuck YOU.

User avatar
Leisher
Site Admin
Posts: 42150
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 9:17 pm
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby Leisher » Sat Jul 20, 2019 9:30 pm

I thought you were off the market?
“Nothing quite brings out the zest for life in a person like the thought of their impending death”
― Jhonen Vasquez, Johnny the Homicidal Maniac: Director's Cut

User avatar
GORDON
Site Admin
Posts: 45089
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:43 pm
Location: DTManistan
Contact:

Victoria's Secret

Postby GORDON » Sat Jul 20, 2019 9:54 pm

I'm required to share.
Fuuuuuuck YOU.

User avatar
TheCatt
Site Admin
Posts: 34670
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 11:15 pm
Location: Cary, NC

Victoria's Secret

Postby TheCatt » Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:53 pm

It's not me, it's someone else.


Return to “Internet Links”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests