Probably. People certainly like to wield scripture.
Hah!
I don't disagree with a lot of what he wrote there. Obviously, the gender gap thing has been disproven to the point where it's a discrediting mark off the bat when it's brought up. My biggest problem is that he's laying blame with religion when it's more apparent that it was a cultural thing that also infected religion (otherwise why are all these different religions having issues with it?). In other words, to me it's like blaming architecture for slavery because slaves were used to build things.TheCatt wrote: Semirelevant to the hijacked discussion
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/fede ... -dk0v.html
I mostly get your point... but if society changes, and the religious organization doesn't...Vince wrote:I don't disagree with a lot of what he wrote there. Obviously, the gender gap thing has been disproven to the point where it's a discrediting mark off the bat when it's brought up. My biggest problem is that he's laying blame with religion when it's more apparent that it was a cultural thing that also infected religion (otherwise why are all these different religions having issues with it?). In other words, to me it's like blaming architecture for slavery because slaves were used to build things.TheCatt wrote: Semirelevant to the hijacked discussion
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/fede ... -dk0v.html
I've been thinking about that a lot lately as well. I think we have to have a sense of meaning and that what we do means something beyond ourselves.GORDON wrote: So, the church tries to stop change, to stop what they see as the rip in the fabric of society, that seemed to work for about 95% of the people. And now those social moors are gone, and it seems like the entire generation of Millennials is completely miserable and lost.
Not saying it's connected, not even saying it's wrong, but it's interesting to wonder if the dots connect.
I don't think the first headline was as accurate as the second, but I still find it odd they changed it.Leisher wrote: Back on topic...
NYT runs a headline that pisses off Dems, so they changed it.
"Freedom of the Press"
MSM changes stuff all the time, no worries. The fact they changed it due to pressure from Dems is what's concerning.TheCatt wrote:I don't think the first headline was as accurate as the second, but I still find it odd they changed it.Leisher wrote: Back on topic...
NYT runs a headline that pisses off Dems, so they changed it.
"Freedom of the Press"
I don't. Can we stop pretending they're the "paper of record" now?TheCatt wrote:I don't think the first headline was as accurate as the second, but I still find it odd they changed it.Leisher wrote: Back on topic...
NYT runs a headline that pisses off Dems, so they changed it.
"Freedom of the Press"
An ICE spokesperson in Detroit said that Aldaoud had “an extensive criminal history“ that involved at least 20 convictions from 1998 to 2017, and had twice been ordered removed from the U.S.
The convictions included assault with a dangerous weapon, domestic violence, theft of personal property, and breaking and entering, according to ICE. A POLITICO search of court records showed Aldaoud served 17 months for a home invasion in 2013.
Now why would a news organization bury this critical information? It's almost like they know most readers don't make it down that far in articles (that's a fact, look it up) and don't want the reader to know that part.Vince wrote: An ICE spokesperson in Detroit said that Aldaoud had “an extensive criminal history“ that involved at least 20 convictions from 1998 to 2017, and had twice been ordered removed from the U.S.
The convictions included assault with a dangerous weapon, domestic violence, theft of personal property, and breaking and entering, according to ICE. A POLITICO search of court records showed Aldaoud served 17 months for a home invasion in 2013.
American lives don't matter.
https://youtu.be/mpVuOzFmrBE