Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Supreme court rules against discrimination< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 29 2009,07:55  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

article

QUOTE
The U.S. Supreme Court sided Monday with white firefighters in their workplace discrimination lawsuit, a divisive case over the role race should play in job advancement.

In the split 5-4 vote, a majority of the justices ruled that the city of New Haven, Connecticut, improperly threw out the results of promotional exams that officials said left too few minorities qualified.

Only one Latino and no African-American firefighters qualified for promotion based on the exam; the city subsequently decided not to certify the results and issued no promotions.

A group of 20 mostly white firefighters sued, claiming "reverse discrimination."

High court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor heard the case on her federal appeals court last year and sided with the city.

The Supreme Court was being asked to decide whether there was a continued need for special treatment for minorities, or whether enough progress has been made to make existing laws obsolete, especially in a political atmosphere where an African-American occupies the White House.

"Fear of litigation alone cannot justify an employer's reliance on race to the detriment of individuals who passed the examinations and qualified for promotions," wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy for the majority.
Don't Miss

The case has received added attention because Sotomayor was on the appellate court that dismissed the appeal of 19 white and one Latino firefighters.

Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel that ruled in February 2008 to uphold a lower court decision supporting New Haven's decision to throw out the results.

In June 2008, Sotomayor was part of a 7-6 majority that denied a rehearing of the case by the full court.


Legal analysts said they expected Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee will want to ask Sotomayor about her role in that case, as well as her comments about ethnicity and the bench.


--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 2
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 29 2009,08:38 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

What a wise decision by that Latina lady.  As a white man I certainly could not have made such a ruling as well as she did, due to her experiences as a Latina woman.

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
Leisher Search for posts by this member.
Top 3%, yo.
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 26651
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 29 2009,10:53 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Good title of this thread Catt. It is discrimination.

Why do so many people, of all colors and creeds, think racism is only a white person's crime, that nobody is racist to whites, and that whites are immune to the effects of racism? Those same people always talk about how racism is ignorance, yet don't see the ignorance in their own words.

"Hello Pot? This is the kettle."
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 4
Malcolm Search for posts by this member.
I disagree.
Avatar



Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Jun. 29 2009,12:12 Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE

This is precisely the sort of thing she should get raked over the coals for.  & won't.

--------------
Diogenes of Sinope:

"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."

"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."

Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:

"Better dead than smeg."
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
3 replies since Jun. 29 2009,07:55 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


 
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Supreme court rules against discrimination
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code