Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: cops flashbang toddler< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
Malcolm Search for posts by this member.
I disagree.
Avatar



Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: May 30 2014,10:40   Ignore posts   QUOTE

Because ... I just don't fucking know anymore.  But the article's author finally nails shit down:
QUOTE
Here’s the problem: If your drug cops conduct a raid that ends up putting a child in the hospital with critical burns, and they did nothing that violates your department’s policy, then there’s something wrong with your policy.

Emphasis is not mine.

QUOTE
According to local coverage of the lawsuit in the Powell Tribune, the expert also testified that “the potential risk to officers justified not looking in the window to see the exact spot where the device would land.â€

Got that? In order to protect police officers, we just have to accept that while enforcing the drug laws, we’ll occasionally get burned babies and incinerated homes.

Good thing the cops are there to protect and serve.


Edited by Malcolm on May 30 2014,10:48

--------------
Diogenes of Sinope:

"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."

"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."

Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:

"Better dead than smeg."
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
0 replies since May 30 2014,10:40 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


 
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply cops flashbang toddler
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code