QUOTE
Taken at face value the findings suggest that the `male organ hypothesis'
put forward here is quite penetrating an argument. Yet for the best of author's
knowledge, male organ has not been touched in the growth literature before.
All the double entendre. Only 17 pages long, not a lot of info/data/graphs backing what's an out-of-nowhere claim, and what is there isn't terribly convincing. Whoever wrote this couldn't be taking it seriously.
But still the question remains: why?
--------------
Diogenes of Sinope:
"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:
"Better dead than smeg."