|
|
| Post Number: 1
|
|
|
| Post Number: 2
|
Cakedaddy 
Group: "Members"
Posts: 6241
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Apr. 27 2010,11:23 |
|
 |
They've always been price competative. . . they were just behind in performance!
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 3
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Apr. 27 2010,11:24 |
|
 |
Almost performance competitive, but from the price-performance perspective, this is the best I've seen from them in a long time.
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 4
|
|
|
| Post Number: 5
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Apr. 27 2010,11:55 |
|
 |
A few years ago they had about 18 months where they were beating Intel on the price/performance curve. Then Intel dropped prices on their Core 2 chips, and AMD has been playing catch up... until now?
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 6
|
|
|
| Post Number: 7
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Apr. 27 2010,12:16 |
|
 |
The current machine I am on is a Core 2 Quad, and works great. Â Was the price/performance leader for a good 6 months. Â Still just fine, almost 2 years later. Â Of course I still haven't tried to play Crysis on it.
Chip is the Q6600, if memory serves, which it probably doesn't.
Edited by GORDON on Apr. 27 2010,12:16
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 8
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Apr. 27 2010,13:53 |
|
 |
I still wouldn't buy an AMD laptop chip, but it looks like I would consider them for a desktop/home server now.
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|