|
Post Number: 1
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 02 2010,07:21 |
|
 |
Full body scans now mandatory if flying out of Heathrow.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8490860.stm
Add to this Obama's spending millions on scanners at US airports, and we should no longer expect to have any privacy if you want to fly. Â Nice trend we have going, here.
I'm calling it now: airports are only the beginning. Â Ultimately, if this trend continues, you won't be allowed to leave your house without a full body scan.
Edit - headline was misleading. But I am still making the call. We'll all be scanned constantly in the nearish future. I'm guessing within 25 years.
Edited by GORDON on Feb. 02 2010,07:24
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 02 2010,07:51 |
|
 |
Ugh.
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
TPRJones 
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 02 2010,09:06 |
|
 |
If we're going to start being scanned all the time, which essentially shows us naked, then I for one will just go ahead and stop wearing clothing in public.
This is fair warning.
-------------- Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
unkbill 
The Mope.

Group: "Members"
Posts: 4058
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 03 2010,16:34 |
|
 |
The new scanners pretty much show a form like gumby and what he has on him. As for privacy. You are just now thinking we have lost it? Been long gone.
-------------- In marriage there is always one person right. And the other one is the husband.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 03 2010,17:03 |
|
 |
Yes but until now they couldn't see you naked.
I'm not buying the "you look like gumby" argument. This is the first generation stuff.
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
Malcolm 
I disagree.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 03 2010,18:41 |
|
 |
I know for a fact that dogs & rats are used to sniff out landmines in third-world countries. There's also research into using honeybees (which actually have a higher accuracy far as I've read). Granted they're training them to find a particular chemical, but they're fucking rats. You can breed them en masse. Even the dog solution seems cheaper & more preferable than the million-dollar scanner machine solution.
-------------- Diogenes of Sinope:
"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:
"Better dead than smeg."
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
Post Number: 11
|
|
Post Number: 12
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 10 2010,06:23 |
|
 |
I read about his side of that yesterday, and was like, wtf? They keep saying that's not possible.
Seriously, wtf?
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 13
|
TPRJones 
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 10 2010,06:26 |
|
 |
The first time I'm directed towards one of these machines, my response will be (in a loud voice), "Why, do you want to see my COCK? Â Is that it? Â Not getting enouch COCK in your life? Â How about I just whip it out right here for you, if you're so hungry for my COCK?"
Sure, I won't actually reach my destination, but it'll be fun.
Edited by TPRJones on Feb. 10 2010,06:27
-------------- Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 14
|
|
Post Number: 15
|
|
Post Number: 16
|
DoctorChaos 
Student of Entropy

Group: "Members"
Posts: 1579
Joined: Oct. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 11 2010,04:10 |
|
 |
QUOTE Adonis was forced to address privacy concerns following reports that the images produced by the scanners broke child pornography laws in the UK. Sickos.
QUOTE âI was a little scared. Something happens [inside the scans], and I came out. Then I saw these girls â they had these printouts. I looked at them. I thought they were some forms you had to fill. I said âgive them to meâ â and you could see everything inside. So I autographed them for them,â stated Khan. In spite of the fact he's being treated like a piece of meat, he handles this with a lot of grace. Good on him.
-------------- Wadda mean? Other people can read this?!
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 17
|
Leisher 
Top 3%, yo.

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 26651
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 11 2010,06:16 |
|
 |
Instead of the scanners, they should just create a box that runs a laser over the person inside like you'd see in a Sci-Fi movie.
If they want it to detect certain chemicals or any active electronic devices, I guess that's fine too, but that's not the point.
Start releasing rumors 2 years before rolling out the first device. Say that you've created a new scanner that causes any explosive material to detonate. It doesn't matter if they're solid, liquid, or gas. This scanner detects them and detonates them.
Tell the world work has begun on a prototype that will contain the blast.
A year later, leak security camera footage of an unknown airport screening station where a man goes into the prototype device and an explosion occurs within the device. Hire the best Hollywood has to offer for the special effects here. He doesn't have to be seen exploding, but those folks on camera must react properly. Then show someone with a hose spray out the machine, and within a minute, the next person enters the same machine.
Now roll the device out and instead of spending millions on each device, spend a couple thousand on properly training your security employees to stop nervous people.
Terrorists are ignorant. That's why they're so willing to die for nothing. They'll have no idea if this new technology works or not. Even if they have scientists of their own telling them that this device is BS, the actual terrorist himself is still a fucking idiot and will be nervous.
No invasion of privacy. No huge costs.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 18
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 11 2010,06:44 |
|
 |
What would we think about those airport scanners in "Total Recall," that show only skeletons and hidden weapons?
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 19
|
Malcolm 
I disagree.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 11 2010,10:10 |
|
 |
Apparently illegal to carry English-Arabic flashcards.
-------------- Diogenes of Sinope:
"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:
"Better dead than smeg."
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 20
|
|
|