Topic: Japanese great tits
started by: Malcolm
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 08 2016,11:19
< Surprisingly intelligent > in some ways.
Posted by TheCatt on Mar. 08 2016,13:22
Such a disappointing link.I can already feel Thib's pain.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 08 2016,14:14
Hey, I made the title "Japanese great tits" instead of "great Japanese tits." It's as clear as day.
Posted by TPRJones on Mar. 08 2016,19:25
I read it as Japans Greatest Tits.Also disappointed.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 08 2016,19:37
Posted by Troy on Mar. 08 2016,20:47
Didn't click on this all day. All for nothing.
Posted by Leisher on Mar. 08 2016,21:40
I'm contemplating a ban for this offense. Fucking bullshit.
Posted by TheCatt on Mar. 09 2016,04:20
Malcolm owes us now.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 09 2016,07:22
My magnanimous and munificent presence isn't enough?
Posted by TheCatt on Mar. 09 2016,08:34
(Malcolm @ Mar. 09 2016,10:22)
QUOTE
My magnanimous and munificent presence isn't enough?
Unless you have some fantastic Japanese boobs, no.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 10 2016,14:39
< G >< r >< e >< a >< t >< >< J >< a >< p >< a >< n >< e >< s >< e >< >< t >< i >< t >< s >. It may or may not be exactly what you think.
Posted by TheCatt on Mar. 10 2016,15:23
That's a start.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 10 2016,15:50
(TheCatt @ Mar. 10 2016,17:23)
QUOTE
That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?
I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Posted by TheCatt on Mar. 10 2016,16:18
(Malcolm @ Mar. 10 2016,18:50)
QUOTE
(TheCatt @ Mar. 10 2016,17:23)
QUOTE
That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?
I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Ah, I use a plugin that show an image when I hover, and so I just saw one image, thinking it was one link.
Posted by Leisher on Mar. 11 2016,07:42
(TheCatt @ Mar. 10 2016,19:18)
QUOTE
(Malcolm @ Mar. 10 2016,18:50)
QUOTE
(TheCatt @ Mar. 10 2016,17:23)
QUOTE
That's a start.
Whatever, I think that's decent trade off ... or do blueballs turn all married guys into unreasonable rage-aholics?
I bet you clicked on them all. It's densely packed.
Ah, I use a plugin that show an image when I hover, and so I just saw one image, thinking it was one link.
Ditto.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 11 2016,08:32
You kids and your damn shortcuts. Back in my day, we had to do all our own clicks.
Posted by Alhazad on Mar. 11 2016,12:23
Lest you thought you could please everyone, I'm disappointed that a thread about scientific discovery has taken a turn toward the lowest-common denominator.
Posted by TPRJones on Mar. 11 2016,14:16
There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
Posted by TheCatt on Mar. 11 2016,14:31
(TPRJones @ Mar. 11 2016,17:16)
QUOTE
There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
AWwwwwww yeah/!
Posted by Alhazad on Mar. 11 2016,15:44
(TPRJones @ Mar. 11 2016,14:16)
QUOTE
There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
No, but they were very common.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 11 2016,18:27
(Alhazad @ Mar. 11 2016,17:44)
QUOTE
(TPRJones @ Mar. 11 2016,14:16)
QUOTE
There was nothing "lowest" about those denominators. Hubba hubba, etc.
No, but they were very common.
Let's see you do better.
Posted by Alhazad on Mar. 11 2016,20:17
You want something less common than tits on a woman?I think I could swing that, if I had to.