Topic: Masive celebrity nudes leaked
started by: Paul
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,17:25
< http://www.reddit.com/r/celebs >
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,17:29
From what I've heard, someone got access to iCloud, so even though these celebrities may have deleted them from their phones they were still on the cloud.
Posted by GORDON on Aug. 31 2014,17:42
I saw almost zero nudes at that link.
Posted by TheCatt on Aug. 31 2014,18:01
There were several nudes, but not a ton.
Posted by Leisher on Aug. 31 2014,18:21
Point out the nudes. A lot of those pictures look like professionally taken photos.
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,18:27
< Kate Upton > < 2 > < 3 > < 4 >< Victoria Justice
>
< Jennifer Lawrence >
< 1 > < 2 > < 3 > < 4 > < 5 > < 6 > < 7 >
< Album >
< Brie Larson > < 2 > < 3 >
< Teresa Palmer >
< Becca Tobin >(Glee) < 2 > < 3 >
< Hope Solo >
< Kirsten Dunst >
< Krysten Ritter >
< SOURCE >
Posted by GORDON on Aug. 31 2014,18:40
I think Jennifer Lawrence might be getting plowed on the regular.
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,18:46
(GORDON @ Aug. 31 2014,21:40)
QUOTE
I think Jennifer Lawrence might be getting plowed on the regular.
Think of all them men you could plow if you had a body like hers.
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,19:06
< What's that red stuff in this Kate Upton pic? >< Shake it, Kate! >
Posted by Leisher on Aug. 31 2014,19:21
Looks like wine.
Posted by GORDON on Aug. 31 2014,19:23
(Paul @ Aug. 31 2014,21:46)
QUOTE
(GORDON @ Aug. 31 2014,21:40)
QUOTE
I think Jennifer Lawrence might be getting plowed on the regular.
Think of all them men you could plow if you had a body like hers.
I would be a lesbian if I had a body like hers.
YOU think about plowing men.
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,19:24
(GORDON @ Aug. 31 2014,22:23)
QUOTE
YOU think about plowing men.
Not during my refractory period I don't!
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,20:25
All of them:< http://www.reddit.com/r....e_place >
Posted by GORDON on Aug. 31 2014,20:43
Is "iCloud" an apple thing?
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,20:45
(GORDON @ Aug. 31 2014,23:43)
QUOTE
Is "iCloud" an apple thing?
Yeah. I think allt he pictures you take on your phone are automatically saved to your iCloud as backup, and so you can access them from any computer.
A lot of people don't know this.
I know I have a similar feature on my Nexus 5 (automatically saving to my Google Drive) but I didn't enable it.
Posted by GORDON on Aug. 31 2014,20:48
Ha ha Apple users.It is weird that all the pics of me plowing Jennifer Lawrence didn't get leaked. peeps must be all jealous and intimidated by my giant hog.
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,21:03
Christina Hendricks needs to leak something.
Posted by Malcolm on Aug. 31 2014,21:22
Christ on a crutch.
Posted by GORDON on Aug. 31 2014,22:06
There are some aubrey plaza ones in this batch.< http://imgur.com/a/9sa5Z >
I wish I knew who more of these wmen were.
Posted by Leisher on Aug. 31 2014,23:13
Posted by Paul on Aug. 31 2014,23:45
< The Kate Upton archive > is worth downloading.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 01 2014,04:50
< Article. >Some claiming fake, others decrying privacy violation.
Who the hell is Mary Winstead?
Posted by Paul on Sep. 01 2014,05:57
(TheCatt @ Sep. 01 2014,07:50)
QUOTE
< Article. >
Some claiming fake, others decrying privacy violation.
Who the hell is Mary Winstead?
Some claiming fake, others decrying privacy violation.
Who the hell is Mary Winstead?
I read last night that the Victoria Justice ones were confirmed fakes (they found the originals that were altered).
Hers were the first photos to disappear, and I assumed that her Disney connection is what got them down quick, but I guess the poster removed them because they were fake.
< Mary Winstead > played Bruce Willis' daughter in the last couple Die Hard flics, and Abraham Lincoln's wife in Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.
She was also in the Thing (remake), Scott Pilgrim Vs the World, The Ring 2, Death Proof (the cheerleader who stays behind as collateral), and Final Destination 3.
I remember looking her up while watching Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 01 2014,06:11
Yesterday... I saw the ones that said J Law, and all I could think of was "Why did so many people upvote Jude Law nude pics?"After I slept, I remembered.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 01 2014,08:37
And because they love being in front of the camera.
And because they have great bodies and like showing them off.
And so they can seduce Gordon.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 01 2014,09:14
Speaking from personal experience, seducing Gordo isn't that difficult.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 01 2014,10:38
Can't rape the willing.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 01 2014,11:25
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 01 2014,11:48
If these women all tweet about this with a #thanksapple hashtag, I wonder how far Apple stock will drop tomorrow.Personally, I think Apple deserves some repercussion. I heard it was a 15 year old kid that hacked them.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 01 2014,11:57
A story about America's sweetheart (like the clean cut A-lister J Law) being traumatized by Apple having an insecure server which allowed a 15 year old to share her naked photos could be a PRdisaster costing them hundreds of millions of dollars.Plus she the celebrities could sure for tens 9(if not hundreds) of millions of dollars.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 01 2014,12:02
I don't have an iPhone, but WHAT I HEARD is that it is defaulted to back up your photos to the iCloud. You can turn this off. But then eventually it turns itself back on again.I am surprised I am not hearing more Apple criticism, yet. I wonder if these women have been told to keep their mouths shut.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 01 2014,12:50
I'm hoping the NSA is somehow involved.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 01 2014,14:42
< Read the terms of service >.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 01 2014,14:44
QUOTE
I am surprised I am not hearing more Apple criticism, yet.
Criticizing Apple for shitty digital security means you need to be able to wrap your head around digital security as a concept in the first place.
QUOTE
I wonder if these women have been told to keep their mouths shut.
Easier to destroy the hacker, those who enabled him, and the various sites that publish the photos without permission. Apple's legal department is considerable.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 01 2014,15:36
Digital security is one thing, making it difficult if not impossible to keep your pictures local is another.
Posted by Cakedaddy on Sep. 01 2014,16:31
So, PCs get viruses. Macs post nude pictures of you on the Internet. Which is worse?
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 01 2014,16:40
Non-techies are far too trusting.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 01 2014,16:44
(Cakedaddy @ Sep. 01 2014,19:31)
QUOTE
So, PCs get viruses. Macs post nude pictures of you on the Internet. Which is worse?
Horseshit. Macs have far more security vulnerabilities but nobody goes after them because they're less than 10% of the market. There's no money in it.
Apple should be getting destroyed in the MSM right now. I don't think normal people realize their stuff was/is at risk too.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 01 2014,17:11
Well, until we know how the account got hacked... we don't know what's at risk
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 01 2014,17:30
Kirsten Dunst took a swipe, called iCloud a piece of shit in a tweet.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 01 2014,18:39
I need to start an IT consulting firm specializing in digital mobile security for celebrities. I would make a killing.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 02 2014,08:20
< Marilyn Monroe 15 minute BJ tape bought for $1.5 million. >Possibly blowing JFK.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 02 2014,08:26
(Paul @ Aug. 31 2014,23:25)
QUOTE
All of them:
< http://www.reddit.com/r....e_place >
< http://www.reddit.com/r....e_place >
Gone.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 02 2014,09:09
(Paul @ Sep. 02 2014,11:26)
QUOTE
(Paul @ Aug. 31 2014,23:25)
QUOTE
All of them:
< http://www.reddit.com/r....e_place >
< http://www.reddit.com/r....e_place >
Gone.
Not gone, just moved around the internet. Once those pictures got out into the wild, they were DLed by countless people who will post them randomly until the end of time.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 02 2014,09:14
I'm still looking for the Scarlett Johansson pics from a couple of years ago.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 02 2014,10:24
(Vince @ Sep. 02 2014,12:14)
QUOTE
I'm still looking for the Scarlett Johansson pics from a couple of years ago.
I heard there were Mila Kunis ones that I never saw.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 02 2014,11:00
Someone here might have hard copies saved of those ScarJo ones...Where they currently reside though...that's a mystery. I switch computers pretty often, and external hard drives even more frequently.
I'll try to dig them up, but in the meantime, let me paint you a picture as only a man can:
She's got red hair, a smoking hot bod, and I'd hit it.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 02 2014,11:01
Those the ones with a mirror and you can see her buttocks?
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 02 2014,11:50
Buttocks and Boobies.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 02 2014,13:04
I really would like those if anyone can dig them up.Would you consider them her best work, even surpassing The Avengers?
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 02 2014,15:36
(Vince @ Sep. 02 2014,11:14)
QUOTE
I'm still looking for the Scarlett Johansson pics from a couple of years ago.
I bet I can rattle the chains and find something.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 02 2014,15:38
(Paul @ Sep. 02 2014,10:20)
QUOTE
< Marilyn Monroe 15 minute BJ tape bought for $1.5 million. >
Possibly blowing JFK.
Possibly blowing JFK.
QUOTE
One of Monroe's ex-husbands, the late baseball great Joe DiMaggio, once tried to buy it from the collector for $25,000 but "he would not part with it," according to FBI files on Monroe that are available on the FBI Web site.
I'm sure that was $25K in 1960-whatever dollars, but holy cripes, Joltin' Joe was a cheap-ass.
Goddamn...
QUOTE
"The FBI agent that I interviewed said J. Edgar Hoover was completely obsessed. A team of nine individuals were analyzing the tape inside a lab. J. Edgar Hoover brought in a few prostitutes who allegedly had been with President Kennedy and they tried to ... see if that was really President Kennedy."
J. Edgar was evil so concentrated it made Nixon look like pure white snow.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 02 2014,15:43
(Malcolm @ Sep. 02 2014,17:36)
QUOTE
(Vince @ Sep. 02 2014,11:14)
QUOTE
I'm still looking for the Scarlett Johansson pics from a couple of years ago.
I bet I can rattle the chains and find something.
The little birdies have responded. PM me for details.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 02 2014,16:11
Someone mention Monroe at work today and I got to thinking about the BJ video of her and it dawned on me that she was pretty much a Kardashian.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 02 2014,17:38
QUOTE
It is not Ms. Ritter’s or Ms. Dunst’s responsibility to protect their own property from theft by not creating said property or only storing it in a specific place....
Indeed, personal responsibility has no place in today's world at all.
Oh, this guy say it was not a hack, it was a sex crime.
< http://www.forbes.com/sites....x-crime >
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 02 2014,17:46
It's just naked pictures. Dear God.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 02 2014,18:19
A sex crime? Like a crime that involved one or more of the sexes?
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 02 2014,18:35
No I think it is like rape. Like a peeping tom is rape or something.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 02 2014,18:41
I saw another article from some some stupid woman asking why they didn't hack the accounts of men.Um... because to get a picture of some guy's junk you usually just have to go through the extreme measure of saying, "Hey, send me a picture of your junk".
And he'll usually throw in a shot of his balls and taint as a bonus for nothing and without you even asking.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 02 2014,18:48
You know, other places there is a word called "biotruth" that is considered off limits when discussing differences between the sexes... it is a BIOTRUTH that women are built smaller in stature (generally), so that is not allowed in an argument about why they shouldn't be firemen. Persons. I am not saying that using the word BIOTRUTH should be winning arguments, but it does in other more PC corners of the interweb.Well...
Why is it bad to slutshame women for their actions, but it is just fine to slutshame men because they like to look at hot, naked chicks, no matter how the pics got out? It is a BIOTRUTH that men are attracted to optimal mating partners that have proven themselves superior reproductive partners by means of wealth and fame.
Goddam double standard, is what it is.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 03 2014,03:31
Everyone wants equality as long as it's just the good stuff.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 03 2014,07:37
(GORDON @ Sep. 02 2014,21:48)
QUOTE
You know, other places there is a word called "biotruth" that is considered off limits when discussing differences between the sexes... it is a BIOTRUTH that women are built smaller in stature (generally), so that is not allowed in an argument about why they shouldn't be firemen. Persons. I am not saying that using the word BIOTRUTH should be winning arguments, but it does in other more PC corners of the interweb.
Well...
Why is it bad to slutshame women for their actions, but it is just fine to slutshame men because they like to look at hot, naked chicks, no matter how the pics got out? It is a BIOTRUTH that men are attracted to optimal mating partners that have proven themselves superior reproductive partners by means of wealth and fame.
Goddam double standard, is what it is.
Well...
Why is it bad to slutshame women for their actions, but it is just fine to slutshame men because they like to look at hot, naked chicks, no matter how the pics got out? It is a BIOTRUTH that men are attracted to optimal mating partners that have proven themselves superior reproductive partners by means of wealth and fame.
Goddam double standard, is what it is.
I was not aware of "biotruth".
I'm going to try to use it often and offensively.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 03 2014,07:52
I don't need made up words to be offensive.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 03 2014,09:39
This one is already out there, used alongside "privilege" and how one can be "racist" for having the wrong economic policy opinions and other stuff I am blanking on at the moment.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 03 2014,09:45
(Malcolm @ Sep. 03 2014,09:52)
QUOTE
I don't need made up words to be offensive.
This is an awesome quote which should become your sig.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 03 2014,10:46
< The hacker is on the run. >
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 03 2014,12:30
< Hah >.
Posted by Paul on Sep. 03 2014,20:58
The FBI be like...
< Jennifer Lawrence topless. >
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 04 2014,11:13
< It keeps going >.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 05 2014,04:13
Apple f'ed up.QUOTE
Well-guarded systems only let users guess passwords a handful of times before blocking access. But until this week, Apple's iCloud service allowed people to guess passwords over and over again. It would never lock out. Eventually, hackers hit it right.
< Apple adding more security. >
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,04:55
I'm sure that comes as a great comfort to many people.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 05 2014,05:45
To me, that's an admission of fault. I hope these celebs sue Apple. I also hope it starts to affect Hollywood's relationship with Apple.
I mean, if you're Jennifer Lawrence would you want to see Apple products being pushed in your movies knowing the whole world has now seen you with someone's load on your face?
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 05 2014,07:24
QUOTE
I hope these celebs sue Apple.
They will lose. Fantastically.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,07:28
(Leisher @ Sep. 05 2014,08:45)
QUOTE
To me, that's an admission of fault.
I hope these celebs sue Apple. I also hope it starts to affect Hollywood's relationship with Apple.
I mean, if you're Jennifer Lawrence would you want to see Apple products being pushed in your movies knowing the whole world has now seen you with someone's load on your face?
I hope these celebs sue Apple. I also hope it starts to affect Hollywood's relationship with Apple.
I mean, if you're Jennifer Lawrence would you want to see Apple products being pushed in your movies knowing the whole world has now seen you with someone's load on your face?
I think Apple is going to get away with it. I think Apple is spinning this to remove attention from the problem that people had local pics that they would never have wanted on iCloud.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 05 2014,07:40
Don't be so sure. -How did Apple market iCloud? Were there ads that called it secure?
-What's the expectations of that security?
-Does not setting a limit to the number of password attempts in this day and age prove incompetence?
-Does constantly trying to connect their consumers' phones and tablets to it after every update, whether they use it or not, add to their responsibilities?
-Apple also had a massive vulnerability in their phones via Bluetooth, yet the dumbfucks always turn that on after an update too.
-If you advertise that you'll hold someone's private files securely, shouldn't you be held responsible if your security fails?
Even if the celebs lose, the stance Apple takes could make them look very bad to other consumers.
P.S. Two days ago a user brought me their old phone wanting me to save the text messages on it before they moved to a new one. I was performing this task for them and had to access their SkyDrive. Well, what they didn't know is that their phone had been backing up ALL of their photos there. Thus, even though they deleted them from their phone, they still existed out there. I saw things I wish I could unsee. Lingerie. Nudes. Dildos inside her. Etc.
Before you ask, if she was hot, I would have already shared them...
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,07:45
I miss the days when it was cool to have a cow-spotted computer in your show, not a fucking apple logo.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,07:46
(Leisher @ Sep. 05 2014,10:40)
QUOTE
Before you ask, if she was hot, I would have already shared them...
1. Ha.
2. I'm sorry for your loss.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 05 2014,07:46
(Leisher @ Sep. 05 2014,09:40)
QUOTE
Don't be so sure.
-How did Apple market iCloud? Were there ads that called it secure?
-What's the expectations of that security?
-Does not setting a limit to the number of password attempts in this day and age prove incompetence?
-Does constantly trying to connect their consumers' phones and tablets to it after every update, whether they use it or not, add to their responsibilities?
-Apple also had a massive vulnerability in their phones via Bluetooth, yet the dumbfucks always turn that on after an update too.
-If you advertise that you'll hold someone's private files securely, shouldn't you be held responsible if your security fails?
Even if the celebs lose, the stance Apple takes could make them look very bad to other consumers.
-How did Apple market iCloud? Were there ads that called it secure?
-What's the expectations of that security?
-Does not setting a limit to the number of password attempts in this day and age prove incompetence?
-Does constantly trying to connect their consumers' phones and tablets to it after every update, whether they use it or not, add to their responsibilities?
-Apple also had a massive vulnerability in their phones via Bluetooth, yet the dumbfucks always turn that on after an update too.
-If you advertise that you'll hold someone's private files securely, shouldn't you be held responsible if your security fails?
Even if the celebs lose, the stance Apple takes could make them look very bad to other consumers.
If Apple's consumers operated on logic...
Secure is relative. Bike locks are "secure."
Expectation of security? Encryption.
Incompetence? No. Insanely stupid, shitty security practices. But you could say the same thing about the password that was cracked. A "good" one should take years of computing time to break. This was probably someone's birth date plus their dog's name, all readily available via social media and websites.
The constant connectivity to "the cloud" doesn't really do much either.
The users are behaving at least as insecurely as the manufacturers. Caveat emptor. You'd think the hardware dudes would know better.
Again ... "secure" is relative. If you want improved security, find dudes that encrypt using one-time padding. Yeah, the key is as big as the ciphertext, but hey ... you want to be sure, right?
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 05 2014,08:15
QUOTE
If Apple's consumers operated on logic...
...they wouldn't buy an Apple.
QUOTE
The users are behaving at least as insecurely as the manufacturers.
That will most likely be Apple's stance, which wouldn't go over well with the general public. And I say that knowing that Apple would be right.
If consumers want security for their private pictures, the very last thing they should be doing is entrusting them to a third party. Instead, just get an external HD and put them on there.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 05 2014,08:41
QUOTE
If consumers want security for their private pictures, the very last thing they should be doing is entrusting them to a third party. Instead, just get an external HD and put them on there.
If you want to be sure, you have to root your phone/device. Period. The vast majority of people will not go to that trouble.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 05 2014,10:08
(Leisher @ Sep. 05 2014,09:40)
QUOTE
Before you ask, if she was hot, I would have already shared them...
That's why you're one of my favorites.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,11:42
I know this is wrong of me to say, but I had an uncle who told me when I was 12, "If you have a secret, never write it down, and never take a picture of it. Someone WILL find it."So part of me absolutely is thinking, "dumbass" about these girls.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 05 2014,11:50
I always hated having my picture taken. Whenever someone asked why, I'd say, "Evidence."
Posted by Vince on Sep. 05 2014,13:25
(GORDON @ Sep. 05 2014,13:42)
QUOTE
So part of me absolutely is thinking, "dumbass" about these girls.
True, but I'm sure most of us throughout part our lives (especially from about 16-30) are eternally grateful for spontaneous but poorly thought out impulsiveness of women.
Or poor decision making skills in general.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,13:41
I feel bad for them, I really do. And I like looking at their boobies, I really do.But I can't help but think my usual phrase... if only there was some way to not take nude pics of ourselves and upload them to the internet. None of us are safe.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 05 2014,13:58
It's terrible they're so stupid to take nude selfies or let their boyfriends take nude pictures of them with cell phones. It's terrible that people would violate someone else's privacy by hacking into their iCloud account and download their private pictures. But it's kind of like a Reeses peanut butter cup. Two great tastes that are great together.I really don't have much thought about it one way or the other. I enjoy seeing them. I wasn't sitting up late at night before they were available wishing they were.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,14:01
What's interesting to me is even successful, rich, hot chicks still feel the need to take naked selfies for their boyfriends.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 05 2014,14:19
(GORDON @ Sep. 05 2014,17:01)
QUOTE
What's interesting to me is even successful, rich, hot chicks still feel the need to take naked selfies for their boyfriends.
You can't judge them poorly because they're placating their audience. Men are visual creatures, women are emotional.
Imagine a world where the roles are reversed. Women would be bugging men like crazy for dick pics, and us being emotional and trusting would send them out with little messages like "Don't show anyone." We'd take 1000 photos of them before finding one that we were happy with.
Etc.
And we would because that's human beings.
Plus, your statement kind of paints them as not being sexual creatures. Maybe these girls love cock and want to tease it.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,14:33
I always saw naked selfies as a little needy, and approval-seeking, which is why I found hot, rich chicks doing it to be interesting.I make them bitches wait, no matter how much they want to see the goods.
Posted by Cakedaddy on Sep. 05 2014,14:56
It's kind of like walking through a dark inner city alley counting the wad of cash you just won at the casino singing "I am rich now! Suck IT!!". I have every right to do this. But, no one will feel sorry for me when I get mugged.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 05 2014,15:40
(GORDON @ Sep. 05 2014,16:33)
QUOTE
I always saw naked selfies as a little needy, and approval-seeking, which is why I found hot, rich chicks doing it to be interesting.
I make them bitches wait, no matter how much they want to see the goods.
I make them bitches wait, no matter how much they want to see the goods.
I am unconvinced by your logic. You're claiming that fame and cash can only be contributing factors to stability and banality as opposed to wild living and chaotic behaviour?
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,15:43
Eh... I see the naked selfies as insecurity and approval-seeking, as I said. We've had this discussion recently, y'all know that in my opinion being rich should be freeing you from a lot of bullshit. Money is freedom.Frankly, if the dudes the pics were for respected them, they wouldn't let their women take the nudie pics in the first place. Now that I said that publicly maybe they will have sex with me.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 05 2014,16:18
QUOTE
Money is freedom.
No, not entirely. Ask all those lottery winners that weren't millions of dollars in debt before they bought that winning ticket. I used to work with a dude on that was on Who Wants to be a Millionaire and walked away with the cash before the final question, six figures. One Friday, he walked out the door like normal, Monday he wasn't there. Halfway through the week, we found out he was in detox. As it happens, he was a recovering alcoholic, sober for who knows how long, and for some reason decided to stop off for a drink after work. Never saw him again. Betting he wasn't real free wherever he was.
QUOTE
Frankly, if the dudes the pics were for respected them, they wouldn't let their women take the nudie pics in the first place.
What in the fuck? Jerry? Jerry Falwell? Is that you, back from the dead?
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 05 2014,17:11
Hey, it's just my opinion.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 21 2014,18:39
I'm disappointed that no one's posted links to pics from this last round of leaked celeb nudes. Aside from any of the Kardashians, because who gives a shit about them.Oh, and I've decided that guys that want their girlfriends to send nude selfies of themselves generally feel that the relationship has a shelf life.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 21 2014,20:25
There was another batch?
Posted by Vince on Sep. 22 2014,03:26
That's what I'm reading. Supposedly came down pretty quick, though. Kim Kardashian (who really cares on that? About as rare as a goose sighting), some new ones of Jennifer Lawrence, Vanessa Hudgens QUOTE
Racy photos resembling the stars were posted on Saturday morning. They were immediately removed by Reddit and the image-sharing site 4chan as part of its new copyright infringement policy. Mary-Kate Olsen, Avril Lavigne, Hayden Panettiere, Lake Bell, Leelee Sobieski and former Disney stars Aly and AJ Michalka are a few of the other potential victims.
< http://www.baltimoresun.com/news....ack=rss >
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 22 2014,04:19
I am not in a position to look for the torrent.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 22 2014,06:25
The Fappening 2.0.The torrents are out there and seem to contain a metric fuckton more pictures.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 22 2014,06:50
News to me... engage torrents.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 22 2014,07:15
I just grabbed an 844 MB file. It contains:
Abigail Spencer
AJ Lee
Alison Brie
Amanda Bynes
Amber Heard
Ashley Benson
Aubrey Plaza
Avril Lavigne
Bar Rafaeli
Candice Swanepoel
Dove Cameron
Emily Ratajkowski
Gabi Grecko
Gabrielle Union
Hayden Panettiere
Hope Solo
Jennette McCurdy
Jennifer Lawrence
Jennifer Lopez
Jenny McCarthy
Jessica Alba
Jill Scott
Joanna 'JoJo' Levesque
Jordan Hinson
Joy Corrigan
Kaley Cuoco
Kate Bosworth
Kim Kardashian
Kreasyshawn
Kristen Bredehoeft
Krysten Ritter
Lady Gaga
Lake Bell
Lea Michelle
Leelee Sobieski
Leilani Dowding
Lori Heuring
Marion Peru
Mary Kate Olsen
May Anderson
Meagan Good
Megan Boone
Melina Perez
Melisa Clarke
Michalka Sisters
Michelle Keegan
Michelle Trachtenberg
Miesha Tate
Mila Kunis
Miley Cyrus
Olivia Munn
Paige Duke
Paris Hilton
Rachel Nichols
Renee Olstead
Rihanna
Sarah Hyland
Sarah Shahi
Scarlett Johansson
Selena Gomez
Shiri Appleby
Taylor Swift
Tenna Torres
Venessa Hudgens
Victoria Justice
Vida Guerra
Yvonne Strahovski
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 23 2014,07:47
Do you think many of these ladies switched to a Droid or Windows phone? Do you think Apple could eventually be sued for potentially costing many of these ladies earning potential? After all, it was their lax security that allowed the hacker to attempt endless passwords.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 23 2014,07:55
QUOTE
Do you think Apple could eventually be sued for potentially costing many of these ladies earning potential? After all, it was their lax security that allowed the hacker to attempt endless passwords.
No. Apple's lawyers would destroy them. If the celebs can drill Apple for letting the photos out, imagine what the liability will be when people get SSNs, CC #s, etc. hacked.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 23 2014,08:08
There's got to be some backlash towards Apple. You think Jennifer Lawrence wants Apple products pushed in her movies? You think Gabrielle Union loves the forcible way Apple tries to make people use iCloud in iOS 8?
To me, if you're not willing to hold them somewhat responsible, then stop publicly bitching about the hacker. Stop calling law enforcement. End of the day, that "hacker" couldn't have gotten into your personal photos IF:
-You understood iCloud fully (I promise you several of these ladies had no clue their photos were being saved there.)
-Apple properly secured their servers
Saying this is all the hacker's fault is ridiculous. Sure, he did the crime, but if you park in the ghetto and leave your keys in the car, is it only the car thief's fault? Would your insurance company see it that way?
The ladies who understood iCloud are guilt-free. They did nothing wrong except trust a shitty company. The ladies who didn't know their pictures were up there have to accept some fault.
And, of course, Apple needs to get some of the blame too.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 23 2014,08:26
QUOTE
There's got to be some backlash towards Apple.
You think Jennifer Lawrence wants Apple products pushed in her movies? You think Gabrielle Union loves the forcible way Apple tries to make people use iCloud in iOS 8?
You think Jennifer Lawrence wants Apple products pushed in her movies? You think Gabrielle Union loves the forcible way Apple tries to make people use iCloud in iOS 8?
Some? Sure. Enough to count? Nope. As for the products in movies, cash talks. Apple pays because they know they run a glorified PR cult.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 23 2014,08:51
Is Apple paying to be in movies? I'm not always so sure. They get used a LOT, and if you listen to Hollywood types in real life, they seem to all use Apples.
I think Apples are a way of life in Hollywood, and I'd bet that some of their screen time is free.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 23 2014,09:40
QUOTE
Is Apple paying to be in movies?
Yes. More than they'd like you to know. < Here >. MS and Apple both spent $1B in publicity in 2013, easy to see who's got the better advertising firm. Also noteworthy is that Comcast outspent Apple and MS combined. And I still fucking want them to die.
Those shitty Apple commercials can't cost that much in production value, so I'm betting they spread the cash around with movie/TV product placement.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 23 2014,10:02
I know nothing of Comcast. Money well spent...Microsoft could rout Apple's tablet dominance if they had half a brain on how to market the Surface.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 23 2014,11:18
< More >?
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 23 2014,12:07
QUOTE
"Never forget, the biggest to come thus far."
Who's bigger than J Law right now?
Or do they mean they have some crazy sex videos or something? Like Meryl Streep getting gangbanged?
QUOTE
In 2013, it also posted a countdown site promising to deliver a message from Brian, the dog who died on the animated television show "Family Guy." Nothing ever came of that promise.
Uh...what? The writer lost me there.
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 02 2014,11:24
< Celebs thinking about suing >. Google.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 02 2014,11:35
(Malcolm @ Oct. 02 2014,14:24)
QUOTE
< Celebs thinking about suing >. Google.
Sadly, in a world where people try to sue the gun manufacturer after someone uses their product to go on a killing spree, this makes sense.
Surely it doesn't make sense to blame the hacker or the people in charge of securing your data.
Nope, this is all the fault of a search engine!
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 02 2014,11:38
QUOTE
"Like the NFL, which turned a blind eye while its players assaulted and victimized women and children, Google has turned a blind eye while its sites repeatedly exploit and victimize these women."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Posted by TPRJones on Oct. 02 2014,15:20
By that same logic shouldn't they be suing Comcast for transmitting the data when people browse the pictures? And Twitter for letting people talk about the images existing and thus help spread them further? Ad Infinitum.
Posted by Troy on Oct. 02 2014,15:31
Apple broke my portable speaker with their stinking update too. Fuck those guys.
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 02 2014,15:37
(TPRJones @ Oct. 02 2014,17:20)
QUOTE
By that same logic shouldn't they be suing Comcast for transmitting the data when people browse the pictures? And Twitter for letting people talk about the images existing and thus help spread them further? Ad Infinitum.
I would chip into the legal fund if someone sued Xfinity.
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 02 2014,15:41
(TPRJones @ Oct. 02 2014,17:20)
QUOTE
By that same logic shouldn't they be suing Comcast for transmitting the data when people browse the pictures? And Twitter for letting people talk about the images existing and thus help spread them further? Ad Infinitum.
The goal of the current US legal system is to have everyone suing everyone else for everything and make it impossible to go through life without counsel permanently on retainer. Paying for a lawyer will be as regular as auto insurance. You'll never leave home without your proof of lawyer. It'll be a tiny card you carry around in your wallet.
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 06 2014,10:55
< Hulk Hogan, Jr. hacked >. Most likely to meet quotas.
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 08 2014,11:19
Jennifer Lawrence is < still insane >.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 08 2014,11:58
She claims she made the photos because she was in a long distance relationship and her boyfriend would either look at porn or look at you. Yeah, that's pretty insane.
Also, if looking at the photos makes someone a sexual criminal, then by that same logic she's a porn star.
Posted by GORDON on Oct. 08 2014,12:55
As dumb as her views about this are, I really am starting to feel bad for these dumb girls. I've seen all the releases that were made public... these girls are doing some really raunchy, embarrassing shit that no one would want to have publicized, especially someone already in the spotlight. Actually starting to feel bad for them.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 08 2014,13:22
I honestly feel bad for them too, but there's a limit to my compassion.I know they're not Kardashians and didn't intend for this stuff to go public. (And for Kim fucking Kardashian to get upset about her photo being out their is beyond ridiculous. The bitch is only famous because of her amateur porn.) However, not taking ANY blame for the photos/videos existing or ANY responsibility for properly securing said images is self-serving horseshit. I know they didn't intent to get hacked, but this is the real world equivalent of taking Polaroids of themselves, handing it to a stranger with no guarantee of security, and then being shocked when other people see it.
Oh, and calling everyone who looks at their nudies a sex offender is complete bullshit and as childish as it gets. You're famous, hot, and naked. Who isn't going to look? It's fucking human nature to look.
If it wasn't happening to them, they'd look. Don't let them fool you and say they wouldn't. It'd be a lie. If NASA had accidentally released images of Liam Neeson's cock a week prior to this scandal Jennifer Lawrence would have looked at them. (TPR just laughed.)
Pro tip:
If you don't want people to see you naked or doing embarrassing things, it's easy. Simply do the following:
1. Don't let someone take photos or video of you doing it.
2. Don't text those images out to people.
If you have a nudie photo out there, someone is going to see it that you didn't want to see it.
Instead of whining about what happened, grow up and realize you can't make people unsee those images or stop their distribution. Stop attacking your fans for having natural curiosity. Fucking OWN those pictures. Teach other women not to act like a victim and instead be empowered by something like this.
Posted by GORDON on Oct. 08 2014,13:27
I keep seeing all this bullshit about "I can do what I want when I want, and you are just slut shaming me for having nudie pics." To me it is just another way of saying that women don't need to be careful in back alleys at midnight, because we just need to teach men to not rape.People should just know to not be kidnappers, but I am not going to put out my thumb for the first car to take my kid to school in the morning, and if you don't put it in writing (or take a picture of it), no one can prove a thing. It's just basic facts of life.
And I told you guys Apple was going to get off easy.
Posted by Vince on Oct. 08 2014,14:45
I think they're funny. Taking and sharing nudes of yourself is like driving without a seatbelt. Yeah, some asshole may T-bone you and be completely in the wrong, but not wearing the seatbelt is on you.
Posted by TheCatt on Oct. 08 2014,15:43
I disagree. I don't think it's irresponsible to take nude photos and send them to your SO. I don't think people should be looking at these photos. But people should try to take at least some precautions.For the record, yes, I looked at them.
Posted by Vince on Oct. 09 2014,03:27
I don't know if I'd say it's irresponsible, but it's a risk they had to know they took going into it. If they didn't go into it knowing these might get out, they're just stupid.
Posted by TheCatt on Oct. 09 2014,04:31
(Vince @ Oct. 09 2014,06:27)
QUOTE
I don't know if I'd say it's irresponsible, but it's a risk they had to know they took going into it. If they didn't go into it knowing these might get out, they're just stupid.
Right, but without Apple's shit-tacular security, we'd never know the pictures existed. Historically, nudes on the internet have been a bitter boyfriend type of thing/revenge porn.
I'm still stunned Apple hasn't taken more fallout for all of this.
Posted by Vince on Oct. 09 2014,05:01
I'm not really but kind of surprised about Apple and the lack of fallout as well, but Apple is the Obama of the tech world. They aren't going to get the bad press.Lots of celeb nudes have made their way online before this. They took a risk and rolled craps.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 09 2014,06:48
I fully endorse all nude photo taking, but don't be so naive to think you shouldn't protect them in every way possible if you don't want people seeing them. And certainly don't blame folks for looking at them once they're out. To imply you wouldn't do the exact same thing in their position is bullshit.
That's why whining about it doesn't help. The damage is done.
Posted by TPRJones on Oct. 09 2014,07:14
QUOTE
TPR just laughed
I did indeed.
On the topic, Jennifer Lawrence is acting like the fisherman yelling at the incoming hurricane to try to make it go away and leave his boat alone.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 13 2014,06:27
< The Snappening >200,000 amateur snapchat photos released.
Posted by TheCatt on Oct. 13 2014,09:25
I need the one where someone filtered out the illegal stuff, the boring stuff, and the penises, and just provide the 40 pics left over.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 13 2014,09:49
It'll be more than 40.I've spoken to a few younger ladies about Snapchat and apparently they were going nuts with it thinking the messages were just to one person and deleted immediately.
If you remember, the first Snapchat scandal was the fact that the company was keeping copies of all the pictures.
They might have been the world's largest database of underage porn. Wonder why nobody busted them on that?
Posted by TheCatt on Oct. 13 2014,11:33
(Leisher @ Oct. 13 2014,12:49)
QUOTE
It'll be more than 40.
...
They might have been the world's largest database of underage porn. Wonder why nobody busted them on that?
...
They might have been the world's largest database of underage porn. Wonder why nobody busted them on that?
I said not illegal.
Posted by Leisher on Oct. 13 2014,13:09
I think you misread what I said.
Posted by TheCatt on Oct. 13 2014,14:44
I didn't. But I was being overly whatever for humorous effect.
Posted by TheCatt on Oct. 13 2014,15:04
< Fake >
Posted by Malcolm on Oct. 13 2014,15:23
QUOTE
To put Snapsaved's post in perspective: 500MB is roughly 10,000 Snapchat photos worth of data, and importantly, it appears that data doesn't come with the personal information that could be used to link it back to you.
Snapsaved apologized for the hack, noting that a majority of it users are in the United States, Sweden, and Norway,
Snapsaved apologized for the hack, noting that a majority of it users are in the United States, Sweden, and Norway,
Thanks for narrowing it down, Snapsaved.
Posted by GORDON on Oct. 20 2014,21:53
< No consequences for Apple. >They're practically being rewarded.