Forum: Internet Links
Topic: more Texas laws about the unborn
started by: Malcolm

Posted by Malcolm on Dec. 28 2013,12:45
< From here >.  
QUOTE
Marlise Munoz, 33, is 18 weeks pregnant and suffered a suspected pulmonary embolism and collapsed on November 26. Her husband, Erick, says his wife is brain dead and wants her removed from a respirator because she had previously stated she wouldn't want to live in such circumstances. However, Texas law favors the preborn child.

Emphasis mine.

I'm torn.  On one hand, this is blatant and insanely overreaching government intervention into the literal lives of its citizens.  The husband has made his wishes quite clear, and it's likely he'll be the one taking care of the kid if it survives.  

On the flip side, one wonders if the part in bold included "even if I'm pregnant."  If so, the state of Texas is being as medically intrusive as any Obamacare regulation because they've made her a state run human incubator.  If not, then I'm not sure about the notion of forcing fatherhood on this dude when he was thinking he'd be going into it with his wife.  I'm still inclined to go with the husband as opposed to the gov't.  Unless Texas has the kid's grandparents or aunts/uncles behind them, I don't see how the state trumps the family.

Posted by Malcolm on Jan. 26 2014,10:54
< Judge cuts life support >.
Posted by Malcolm on Jun. 03 2015,10:11
< Family beats the shit > out of their daughter to induce an abortion.  Maybe because getting an abortion in Texas requires one to jump through an endless number of bureaucratic hoops and make the journey to one of the ever decreasing number of places that state hasn't legislated out of existence yet.
Posted by Malcolm on Jul. 15 2015,13:13
< 95% of women don't > regret abortions.  Oops, wrong number.
QUOTE
Every six months, the women were asked whether they felt their decision to have an abortion was the right choice. They were also asked about positive and negative emotions, including relief, happiness, regret, guilt, sadness and anger. Women may experience a mix of positive and negative emotions around an abortion, and these emotions may or may not influence whether they feel they made the right choice, the researchers said.

In the raw data, 95 percent of the women reported they'd made the right choice to have an abortion in each of the follow-up surveys. This number isn't entirely accurate, because some women didn't answer every survey, and it doesn't take into account individual variation over time, Rocca said. After statistical adjustment to account for these factors, the researchers found that more than 99 percent of women reported having made the right decision at every follow-up.

It's 99%.

Posted by Alhazad on Jul. 15 2015,14:41
It'd be nice to see either number publicized.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 03 2015,10:13
< Supreme Court > has to step in because the state of Texas is run by dicks.
QUOTE
The state, backed by the appeals court, argued that traveling about 150 miles to obtain an abortion is not an undue burden. Women in west Texas who would not have a clinic even that close could travel into New Mexico, the court said.

If a Texan had to drive 150 miles to get a gun (also Constitutionally protected) they would go apeshit.

Posted by Malcolm on Nov. 13 2015,12:34
< Texas law written by assholes going to Supreme Court >.
Posted by Malcolm on Nov. 24 2015,10:18
< Wisconsin law struck down >.
QUOTE
The law in question requires doctors who provide abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of where they carry out the procedure.
...
A panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago in a 2-1 ruling concluded Monday the medical benefit to the requirement was “nonexistent” and “cannot be taken seriously as a measure to improve women’s health.”
...
“What makes no sense is to abridge the constitutional right to an abortion on the basis of spurious contentions regarding women’s health – and the abridgment challenged in this case would actually endanger women’s health,” Judge Richard Posner wrote for the majority.



Posted by Malcolm on Feb. 20 2016,09:28
< Rick Allgeyer, director of research at the Texas Health and Human Services Commission > dared to support PP funding in Texas.  Shortly after he co-wrote a study suggesting this, he was forced to announce his retirement.

QUOTE
“It’s one thing for an agency to provide data upon request. It’s quite another to be listed as a ‘co-author’ on a deeply flawed and highly political report,” Nelson told the Associated Press last week. “I’ve communicated strong concerns to the agency. This should not have happened, and we need to make sure it doesn’t happen again.”

That's a Texas state senator calling someone out for making an issue political.  I also don't see any specific refutations that elaborate on the flaws mentioned.

QUOTE
Rick Allgeyer, director of research at the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, had teamed up with researchers from the University of Texas at Austin’s Population Research Center to look at what happened after Texas booted Planned Parenthood from its state-run Women’s Health Program in 2013.

Their study, which was published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine early this month...

You'll note both those institutions are completely disregarded by mainstream scientists and have never done studies like this before.  I bet state Senator Jane Nelson and her election team have dozens of white papers on this subject to their credit.  I can't seem to find any...



Posted by Malcolm on Feb. 22 2016,10:21
< John Oliver on TRAP laws >.
QUOTE
For instance, thanks to strict regulations, the states of Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, and South Dakota are down to one abortion clinic each.

“That’s right, Mississippi now has four times as many s’s as abortion clinics,” Oliver said.

Glad I'm out of that shit state.



Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 02 2016,10:23
< Supreme Court case > begins.  I hope they bitch slap that state.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 18 2016,13:01
< "Still accessible." >
QUOTE
But she found that getting an appointment for an abortion, even in one of the country’s largest metropolitan areas, proved almost as stressful as the unwanted pregnancy. The number of abortion clinics in Texas has shrunk by half since a 2013 state law imposed new regulations that many said they found impossible to meet. When Amy called the two clinics here just after New Year’s, and a third in Dallas, the earliest available appointment was on Jan. 22.
...
Another patient at the clinic last week, Amber, 22, said that she had initially been told she would have to wait 19 days for an abortion, and that she was relieved when the clinic was able to see her in 10 days, because of a cancellation.
...
Women in the Fort Worth area have more options than many others. Smaller cities, including Beaumont, Lubbock, Waco and Killeen, have been left without a single abortion clinic. But even for women here, and in Houston, San Antonio and Dallas, the law has left some waiting for weeks for abortions
...
Candice Russell, a 32-year-old administrative assistant from Irving, was 12 weeks along when she learned she was pregnant in 2014, she said, and she faced a wait of two and a half weeks for an abortion in Dallas or Fort Worth.

Instead, Ms. Russell took out a high-interest payday loan and flew to California, where her partner lived and where she was able to get an abortion in a matter of days.

Yeah, accessible.

QUOTE
Stephanie, a 20-year-old student, said she had recently driven through the night to Albuquerque for an abortion 16 weeks into her pregnancy after she could not come up with the money in time to have the procedure done at a clinic in El Paso, where she lives. Because of the earlier Texas law that requires all abortions after 16 weeks to be done in surgical centers, her options were limited to the closest such center, 550 miles away in San Antonio, or a regular abortion clinic in New Mexico.

Totally.

QUOTE
Other patients at the clinic that weekend had driven from Lubbock, about 300 miles away, and Odessa, 320 miles away.

Just a hop, skip, and a jump away.



Posted by TPRJones on Mar. 18 2016,13:14
Google searches on self-abortion how-tos have been on the rise.  I'm sure you can guess which states have seen that delightful trend.
Posted by GORDON on Mar. 18 2016,13:32
A gentleman like.me.leaves them a plan b pill next to the bed when be leaves in the middle of the night.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 18 2016,14:18

(GORDON @ Mar. 18 2016,15:32)
QUOTE
A gentleman like.me.leaves them a plan b pill next to the bed when be leaves in the middle of the night.

< I hope > you've got a hookup for those times when you whore around Texas.
QUOTE
The morning after pill is over the counter for anyone over 17 — regardless of gender. Unless, of course, you live in Texas or Mississippi, where pharmacists are refusing to dispense it to men.


Shit, or < other places >.
QUOTE
According to the study, 73 percent of the pharmacies that didn’t give emergency contraception to men said they needed to see the woman taking the pill or needed to see her ID card. Twenty-seven percent of them said they didn’t have the pills in stock.



Posted by GORDON on Mar. 18 2016,14:57

(Malcolm @ Mar. 18 2016,17:18)
QUOTE
QUOTE
The morning after pill is over the counter for anyone over 17 — regardless of gender. Unless, of course, you live in Texas or Mississippi, where pharmacists are refusing to dispense it to men.

LOL if you buy your drugs in a brick and mortar.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 18 2016,15:27

(GORDON @ Mar. 18 2016,16:57)
QUOTE

(Malcolm @ Mar. 18 2016,17:18)
QUOTE
QUOTE
The morning after pill is over the counter for anyone over 17 — regardless of gender. Unless, of course, you live in Texas or Mississippi, where pharmacists are refusing to dispense it to men.

LOL if you buy your drugs in a brick and mortar.

Something tells me that a Plan B pill isn't something you want to roll the dice on with an online purchase.
Posted by GORDON on Mar. 18 2016,15:29
Like it's my problem.
Posted by TPRJones on Mar. 18 2016,21:01
That sounds less gentlemanly.
Posted by GORDON on Mar. 18 2016,22:20

(TPRJones @ Mar. 19 2016,00:01)
QUOTE
That sounds less gentlemanly.

The effort makes me gentlemanly.  Poor product makes me a victim, I got ripped off.
Posted by Malcolm on Mar. 29 2016,10:14
< Virginia governor > vetoes PP blocking bill.
QUOTE
Supporters of the legislation said it’s needed to ensure state funds go to “more comprehensive providers” of health care services.

“The governor is clearly listening to his friends in the abortion lobby, rather than ensuring that women have access to quality care,” said Del. Ben Cline, the measure’s sponsor.

Right.  In response to this and other equally insane state abortion regs, here's an idea for a new law: every priest of any faith has to have a PhD in psychiatry (psychology isn't good enough) with at least five years of clinical or professional experience.  If they're supposed to be counseling people in times of distress, then we have to be sure to protect the mental safety of those involved and make sure the flock isn't just a huge congregation of schizos.  If your church can't field someone like that, I guess we'll shut your ass down and you can drive 100 miles both ways every week to go worship.



Powered by Ikonboard 3.1.5 © 2006 Ikonboard