Forum: Internet Links Topic: Photographer shows NY lifestyle started by: Leisher Posted by Leisher on Feb. 27 2013,10:21
< in the nude... >Obviously, that link isn't safe for work. The pictures are interesting, but why nudity was needed...I'm not sure. It's appreciated though!! Posted by TheCatt on Feb. 27 2013,10:28
When is nudity not needed?
Posted by Malcolm on Feb. 27 2013,10:49
(TheCatt @ Feb. 27 2013,12:28) QUOTE When is nudity not needed? Any movie scene with Kathy Bates. Posted by GORDON on Feb. 27 2013,11:19
Art is art, but I really hate gimmicky bullshit like that.
Posted by TPRJones on Feb. 27 2013,16:26
I like it.Truth be told, I'm not a huge fan of most porn. I would prefer if porn were just like any other good movie with a nice script and good acting and special effects and a story, except the actresses (and actors, I guess) happened to be attractive and naked. This feels kind of like that, just everyday activities but she's nude for it. Posted by GORDON on Feb. 27 2013,16:53
When I am analyzing art I always think, "Did it take any skill to make this?" That is one of my little internal criteria for what makes good art. In this case, I think the answer is no.It's also why I don't care for punk music. ;-) Posted by TheCatt on Feb. 27 2013,17:11
DK RULEZ
Posted by Leisher on Feb. 28 2013,06:39
QUOTE Truth be told, I'm not a huge fan of most porn. I would prefer if porn were just like any other good movie with a nice script and good acting and special effects and a story, except the actresses (and actors, I guess) happened to be attractive and naked. This feels kind of like that, just everyday activities but she's nude for it. So you prefer reality porn where everyone pretends they're all amateurs, and no scene ever breaks down into cheesy music and porn dialogue? Posted by TheCatt on Feb. 28 2013,07:44
Like TPR, I'd prefer something more "real" as well. It's hard to find erotic movies that have plot, that then don't go all artistic - Whereby I mean "ugly people" or "stupid depressing story"
|