Topic: Slightly NWS: Pick 1 (1-6 from left)
started by: TheCatt
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 14 2015,18:10
Posted by Alhazad on Sep. 14 2015,18:12
There are seven people in the picture.
Posted by TPRJones on Sep. 14 2015,18:20
I picked 6, but 1 is also quite nice.
Posted by GORDON on Sep. 14 2015,18:22
I would put a baby in all of them but 5 is the first one I would ask to see if she likes Doctor Who.
Posted by Alhazad on Sep. 14 2015,18:36
(GORDON @ Sep. 14 2015,18:22)
QUOTE
I would put a baby in all of them but 5 is the first one I would ask to see if she likes Doctor Who.
Putting one baby in six women usually gets you jail time.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 14 2015,18:41
(Alhazad @ Sep. 14 2015,20:36)
QUOTE
(GORDON @ Sep. 14 2015,18:22)
QUOTE
I would put a baby in all of them but 5 is the first one I would ask to see if she likes Doctor Who.
Putting one baby in six women usually gets you jail time.
"Baby" is his dick's name.
Posted by Alhazad on Sep. 14 2015,18:57
(Malcolm @ Sep. 14 2015,18:41)
QUOTE
(Alhazad @ Sep. 14 2015,20:36)
QUOTE
(GORDON @ Sep. 14 2015,18:22)
QUOTE
I would put a baby in all of them but 5 is the first one I would ask to see if she likes Doctor Who.
Putting one baby in six women usually gets you jail time.
"Baby" is his dick's name.
So when he's making love and he says, "Oh, baby!", he means... ?
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 14 2015,19:14
(Alhazad @ Sep. 14 2015,21:12)
QUOTE
There are seven people in the picture.
I'm only counting belly buttons.
Posted by TPRJones on Sep. 14 2015,19:17
That's not where that goes.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 14 2015,19:18
I chose this picture cuz I think all the women are flawed, but differently.#2 has a pig face.
#3 and 6 were smart to wear sunglasses to hide their flaws.
#6 was my 2nd choice, but I went with #3.
Posted by Alhazad on Sep. 14 2015,19:35
(TheCatt @ Sep. 14 2015,19:18)
QUOTE
I chose this picture cuz I think all the women are flawed, but differently.
#2 has a pig face.
#3 and 6 were smart to wear sunglasses to hide their flaws.
#6 was my 2nd choice, but I went with #3.
#2 has a pig face.
#3 and 6 were smart to wear sunglasses to hide their flaws.
#6 was my 2nd choice, but I went with #3.
#4 looks slightly like Christoph Waltz.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 14 2015,19:45
(TheCatt @ Sep. 14 2015,22:18)
QUOTE
I chose this picture cuz I think all the women are flawed, but differently.
#2 has a pig face.
#3 and 6 were smart to wear sunglasses to hide their flaws.
#6 was my 2nd choice, but I went with #3.
#2 has a pig face.
#3 and 6 were smart to wear sunglasses to hide their flaws.
#6 was my 2nd choice, but I went with #3.
Everyone is flawed is some way.
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
Posted by Alhazad on Sep. 14 2015,20:07
(Leisher @ Sep. 14 2015,19:45)
QUOTE
Everyone is flawed is some way.
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
Catt says he's only counting belly-buttons, so I suppose we're picking lint.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 16 2015,11:40
(Leisher @ Sep. 14 2015,22:45)
QUOTE
Everyone is flawed is some way.
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
To some extent... sure.
But compare those 6 to these 4 (SFW)
< Picture >
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 16 2015,12:12
Of the original 6, I think I'd have to date #2. Her face is kind of spread out, but you can tell she's got the best personality. #1, 4, and 6 don't have good faces, although 6 is a spinner. #5 looks like she's had a rough life already. #3 might be the secret best pick, but not based on that picture.For the new four, #4 wins all day every day. #3 is next in line for prettiest, but something about her throws me off. I think she might have fat genes. #1 is cute, and I'm betting is great in bed. Probably gets pretty bitchy too. (I know, shocker.) #2 is worst of the three, not a bad thing here, and probably the most "normal".
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 16 2015,12:14
(Leisher @ Sep. 16 2015,15:12)
QUOTE
For the new four, #4 wins all day every day. #3 is next in line for prettiest, but something about her throws me off. I think she might have fat genes. #1 is cute, and I'm betting is great in bed. Probably gets pretty bitchy too. (I know, shocker.) #2 is worst of the three, not a bad thing here, and probably the most "normal".
I only know who #1 and #2 are. But #4 is pretty hot. I'd pick either #4 or #1. #2 is 3rd.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 16 2015,12:14
(Leisher @ Sep. 16 2015,15:12)
QUOTE
#3 [...], but something about her throws me off. I think she might have fat genes.
I had the exact same thought.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 16 2015,12:16
< A harder choice >
Posted by Stranger on Sep. 16 2015,12:26
5 or 6 but I went with 5.. She kinda looks like Kate Middleton, I could have a lot of fun with that thought.
Posted by Leisher on Sep. 16 2015,12:37
(TheCatt @ Sep. 16 2015,15:16)
QUOTE
< A harder choice >
I went through it and eliminated half of them in a single glance. I told a co-worker if the average woman could watch me go through a list of Victoria's Secret models that way, she instantly develop an eating disorder.
For the record:
#1 - Crazy hot and crazy high maintenance. You'd better have money.
#2 - Too much of an Amazon
#3 - Buy a brush and we'll talk.
#4 - No
#5 - No
#6 - No
#7 - Yes
#8 - No
#9 - A very big YES
#10 - Yes
#11 - No
#12 - Is she aware of the camera? No.
#13 - Yes
#14 - No
#15 - No
#16 - Maybe
#17 (below #16) - Yes
#18 - Yes (first one I spotted that I liked in my first glance)
#19 - Yes, but she's high maintenance
#20 - No
#21 - Yes
#22 - No
#23 - Yes
#24 - No
#25 - No
Some of the more famous ones I said yes to just because they're famous.
I'm strictly picking based on dating. Putting babies in all of them doesn't even need to be stated.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 16 2015,14:23
(TheCatt @ Sep. 16 2015,13:40)
QUOTE
(Leisher @ Sep. 14 2015,22:45)
QUOTE
Everyone is flawed is some way.
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
What are we picking? A date? A roll in the hay?
To some extent... sure.
But compare those 6 to these 4 (SFW)
< Picture >
#1 looks too much like Kristen Stewart. Hell, no.
The more I look at #3, the more evil she seems.
#2 looks like she uses a riding crop.
By process of elimination, #4.
Posted by Malcolm on Sep. 16 2015,14:25
(TheCatt @ Sep. 16 2015,14:16)
QUOTE
< A harder choice >
Off the top of my head, I'm kicking out the ones that weren't smart enough to look into the goddamn camera.
Back row, from left, 1-8: not looking into the camera, look wasted (2), angry (3), or like they love nothing better than crushing balls (7 & 8) 'neath stiletto heels.
9: ok
10-13: look pissed, not looking into the camera, or perhaps taking a shit (12)
14: ok
15-16: not looking into the goddamn camera, how fucking hard is that?
Front row, from left, 1: ok
2: looks wasted
3-7: ok
8-9: Look. Into. The. Fucking. Camera. Pay fucking attention.
Posted by TPRJones on Sep. 16 2015,14:26
I bet #2 is the best in bed by far. But then I like to laugh.
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 16 2015,14:49
Well, since yall did the VS ones... let's go:1: Yes
2: Yes
3: No
4: No
5: Maybe
6: Yes
7: No
8: No
9: Yes
10: Yes
11: No
12: no
13: yes
14: yes
15: no
16: yes
Bottom row:
no no yes yes yes no no maybe yes
Posted by TheCatt on Sep. 16 2015,14:52
(Leisher @ Sep. 16 2015,15:37)
QUOTE
I went through it and eliminated half of them in a single glance. I told a co-worker if the average woman could watch me go through a list of Victoria's Secret models that way, she instantly develop an eating disorder.
My wife and I are watching Bachelor in Paradise.
Her: Of course people like X, she's hot.
Me: Meh.
Her: What?
Me: She's got a great body, but that face. No. Just no.
I once sat outside class at UNC in spring (20 years ago), and counted attractive versus unattractive chicks. It was 97-3 ugly to attractive. I'm just picky.
QUOTE
I'm strictly picking based on dating. Putting babies in all of them doesn't even need to be stated.
Amazing how the baby thing is such a lower standard.
Posted by Vince on Sep. 18 2015,09:34
Sunglasses hide a lot of ugly, so I went w/ #5 because of titties.