|
Post Number: 1
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Mar. 01 2016,12:30 |
|
 |
No way, fuck the union, Go Jersey.
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
TPRJones 
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Mar. 01 2016,19:46 |
|
 |
Much as I hate unions, the state shouldn't be able to retroactively screw over employees by ducking out of signed contracts. Shouldn't have signed those contracts in the first place, sure, but it's too late now.
-------------- Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
TPRJones 
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Mar. 01 2016,20:14 |
|
 |
Sure. Â But until they declare bankruptcy and go through the mess that entails they shouldn't be able to break contracts to past employees. Â There's many other portions of that debt that should become bad debt before they get down to this one.
When you're 70 and retired and alone living off your pension what would you do if they cut it by 70%? Keep in mind that past state employees don't qualify for social security, either.
Edited by TPRJones on Mar. 01 2016,20:15
-------------- Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
TPRJones 
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Mar. 02 2016,08:23 |
|
 |
From the article: Original amount owed to retired old people: $2.25 billion New amount that will be paid to retired old people: $681 million Cut in benefits payments implied: 70%
But, yeah, it's just retired old people. If they'd just die faster that'll save the state a lot of money.
-------------- Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
|
Post Number: 11
|
TPRJones 
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Mar. 02 2016,08:58 |
|
 |
Oh. The article is badly written, because it clearly states they were cutting actual pension benefits by 70%. But upon this I read the actual order and it seems you are correct, it's just the current deposits for active employees that were cut. In fact the future benefits aren't even being cut, they're just not putting in the money needed to pay for those future benefits.
I stand corrected. Although making state employees "help fund their personal retirement plan" is a bit misleadingly simplified just because as state employees they are removed from the social security system specifically because the state is supposed to be taking care of their pensions. If that second part is no longer going to be true perhaps the first part should also be reexamined.
-------------- Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
 |
|
|
|
|