|
Post Number: 1
|
Leisher 
Top 3%, yo.

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 26651
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,06:19 |
|
 |
Featuring first ever plus sized model.
I've got to say I have a problem with this move. I know, I know that makes me an asshole and I'm against female rights and I don't know what a real woman is and yada yada yada.
Horseshit. That's all smoke and mirrors thrown out to distract from the real issue at hand.
I do agree that plus sized models should be used in advertising more often because most woman aren't size 0. It makes sense to cater to your audience and your audience eats more than a Chiclet for dinner.
That being said, the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue is supposed to be a celebration of women who are "ideal", not "what a real woman looks like". They're supposed to represent a goal that woman could strive for, not placate them and help them quit once they kinda, sorta look ok.
This is nothing more than Sports Illustrated lowering the bar.
I'm not trying to be insulting to the woman in the layout, but I'd describe her body as "sloppy". Normally, I never would, but in this particular setting where athletes in peak physical condition are celebrated, she's way out of shape and it's NOT ok.
I see women all over FB praising this move and saying it's about time. Really? Is there anyone on the planet more hypocritical than women who are crazy vocal about this issue? They're the same ones who stood in line to see Magic Mike on opening night. And that's part of the issue too. There is no movement by these same women claiming they want to see male models with "real bodies". I don't see Kevin James getting put into Magic Mike unless they are going to mock him.
Don't drag down society's standards because you can't achieve them. Admit that the majority of women can't get to that level of fitness because of real life. They work, they're older, they don't have time to work out, they have kids, far more important things to do, don't have the right genetics, yada, yada, yada. That's not mocking, that's all TRUE. Men know this to be true.
A woman doesn't have to be a size 0 to be beautiful, but we certainly shouldn't be celebrating mediocrity as if it's the pinnacle of female fitness.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 2
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,07:00 |
|
 |
SI isn't really including her.  She's an ad. QUOTE For the first time ever, the magazine will include a plus-size model — in a paid advertisement.
My wife and I were kinda talking about this last night. Apparently 50 to 60 years ago, the average woman was 25" waist (size 2/4?), and now the average is 34".
Maybe they should shut their mouths? (Both to shut up, and to stop shoveling crap into their pie holes).
QUOTE To this point, the average American woman in the 1950s had a 25 inch waist compared to Monroe’s 22 inches. Whereas today, the average American woman has a waist size of 34 inches, so the gap between the models and “average†was much less pronounced then. Stop getting fat, America.
Edited by TheCatt on Feb. 06 2015,07:04
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 3
|
|
Post Number: 4
|
|
Post Number: 5
|
Stranger 
Bucket of Shit

Group: "Members"
Posts: 1542
Joined: Apr. 2012
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,08:08 |
|
 |
I wouldn't even think twice.. I'd hit it.
-------------- O.I.C.
#OnlyInCleveland
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 6
|
|
Post Number: 7
|
|
Post Number: 8
|
|
Post Number: 9
|
|
Post Number: 10
|
Stranger 
Bucket of Shit

Group: "Members"
Posts: 1542
Joined: Apr. 2012
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,08:38 |
|
 |
...And Gordon would too
-------------- O.I.C.
#OnlyInCleveland
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 11
|
|
Post Number: 12
|
Vince 
I make sweet, sweet love to my legally licenced copy of Microsoft Vista.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 5016
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,09:48 |
|
 |
They're developing a fat mafia that's modeling itself and its tactics after the gay mafia. If you don't accept them as readily as a not-fat person, you're a bigot and body shaming. If you're not fat and highlight your firm figure, you're abusing young girls and are a bigot. If you don't celebrate their plumpness, you're a bigot.
... and you damned well better not refuse to bake them a cake... ;-)
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 13
|
Malcolm 
I disagree.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,09:59 |
|
 |
The freedom to be fat seems to go with many of the other things the first amendment guarantees. Aside from rare conditions, your body mass is under your control at least as much as the belief system you pick.
-------------- Diogenes of Sinope:
"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:
"Better dead than smeg."
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 14
|
Leisher 
Top 3%, yo.

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 26651
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,17:33 |
|
 |
Here's the REAL plus sized model being used in Sports Illustrated.
And yes, I'm ok with her being in it.
There's a huge difference between a woman who clearly takes care of herself, even if she's not size 0 and one who doesn't do anything, like the one in the ad.
One should be used for whatever issue or ad you want. The other shouldn't be used to promote a bullshit agenda. Particularly in a nation where obesity is the number one killer.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 15
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,17:44 |
|
 |
Would. The original one, I mean.
Edited by GORDON on Feb. 06 2015,17:45
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 16
|
Leisher 
Top 3%, yo.

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 26651
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,17:50 |
|
 |
It save us all time if you'd just point out the ones you wouldn't.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 17
|
GORDON 
90%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,18:03 |
|
 |
There are plenty I wouldn't. I just don't happen to think that woman is unattractive, and I typically dislike overweight chicks. She just carries it well, as far as I can tell from a single still image.
Would still prefer to be the filling in a Mila Kunis/Gordo/Natalie Portman oreo cookie.
-------------- I don't give a fuck!
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 18
|
TheCatt 
Top 2%

Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,19:03 |
|
 |
Would not: the original one.
Would: the latter.
Although, Robyn's a bit of a special case, I mean she's 6'2". She's not plus-sized like fat, she's just a large person.
-------------- It's not me, it's someone else.
|
 |
|
|
Post Number: 19
|
Vince 
I make sweet, sweet love to my legally licenced copy of Microsoft Vista.

Group: Privateers
Posts: 5016
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: Feb. 06 2015,19:25 |
|
 |
I agree that the one in the ad carries it well.
|
 |
|
|
|
|