|
|
| Post Number: 1
|
Malcolm 
I disagree.
Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
|
 |
Posted on: May 14 2014,13:07 |
|
   |
Point 1.
QUOTE The E.U.’s Court of Justice, based in Luxembourg and roughly equivalent to the U.S. Supreme Court, embraced the concept in part; it ruled that even though a Spanish newspaper had the right to publish information online about the man’s tax problems, Google had no right to provide links to it if the man objected.
So you can sue Google for handing out links to things like this and not deleting them? Fuck ... what news could you post online, then? Ah, worry ye not. There's a loophole.
QUOTE The ruling does recognize a different standard for public figures and for data that has scientific or historic value, but when it comes to information about ordinary private citizens, Internet companies often will have to remove links to personal information upon request...
Celebrities are still fair game because gossip websites have to make money, goddamnit.
--------------
Diogenes of Sinope:
"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:
"Better dead than smeg."
|
 |
|
|
| Post Number: 2
|
TPRJones
I saw The Fault in our Stars opening night.
Group: Privateers
Posts: 12384
Joined: May 2004
|
|
Posted on: May 14 2014,13:34 |
|
 |
QUOTE it ruled that even though a Spanish newspaper had the right to publish information online about the man’s tax problems, Google had no right to provide links to it if the man objected.
...wut? Â Am I reading that right? Â Is that really as completely ass-backwards retarded as I think it is?
The information can be posted online and that's fine, but linking to where the information posted is illegal? Â How can linking to something already out there ever be illegal when the thing being out there isn't itself illegal? Â That's like arresting the guy that the bank robbers stopped to ask for directions to the bank from, but letting the bank robbers go.
QUOTE “It definitely makes Europe a less favorable place for these companies to do business. . . . But that’s a balance these countries are allowed to make,â€
If the EU is going to hold Google liable for the contents of every page they link to, Google's best move would be to shut down any offices in the EU and block all searches originating from an EU address. As should all the other search providers. No amount of money they could make off that market would offset the potential liability costs involved.
See how the EU likes not having access to any search engines, see if that changes their minds.
Edited by TPRJones on May 14 2014,13:41
--------------
Vidi Perfutui Veni
|
|
|
|
| Post Number: 3
|
Malcolm
I disagree.
Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
|
|
Posted on: May 15 2014,10:34 |
|
|
Another take.
--------------
Diogenes of Sinope:
"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."
"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."
Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:
"Better dead than smeg."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
