Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: The latest trend in home ownership< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
Leisher Search for posts by this member.
Top 3%, yo.
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 26651
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 02 2010,12:08  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Walk away.

Think it's possible that banks will start blacklisting folks who go with the "strategic foreclosure" option?

Sure, it may be a good time to pull this, while the banks are swapped and they dare not do anything during this economic downturn, but what happens when things get better again? Will banks get all "The Bride" on people who walked now or will they forgive them, but put into place policies that prevent the trend from occurring in the future?

P.S. This would explain apparent and sudden financial windfalls the wife and I have noticed among a few people we know.


Edited by Leisher on Mar. 02 2010,12:09
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info WEB 
 Post Number: 2
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 02 2010,12:21 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

Interesting.

If it were as simple as walk away, they get the house, the end, I'd probably consider it if I were crazy in debt.  Of course, I'd never be crazy in debt, so......

QUOTE
In many so-called recourse states, lenders can go after you for the difference between what the house eventually sells for and the amount owed. Lenders can seek a “deficiency judgment” against the borrower for that amount. It doesn’t happen that often these days, with lenders so bogged down with defaults, but it can. And new breeds of servicing firms   are springing up to collect this debt.

I wonder how many states allow for that?  Or if lenders would even bother considering how much more legal cost that is to them.

Guess they shouldn't have written all those crappy mortgages.


Edited by TheCatt on Mar. 02 2010,12:22

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
Mommy Dearest Search for posts by this member.
Ask me about my TMD's.




Group: Privateers
Posts: 1396
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 02 2010,20:20 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

And we seem to forget the fact (or never knew it) that if you walk away and they foreclose the difference between fair market value  and loan amount is includible in income in the year of debt forgiveness.  some times it does backfire
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 4
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 02 2010,20:36 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

That's crazy.

we need a revolution.


--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 5
unkbill Search for posts by this member.
The Mope.
Avatar



Group: "Members"
Posts: 4058
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Mar. 04 2010,06:37 Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE


(TheCatt @ Mar. 02 2010,12:21)
QUOTE
Interesting.

If it were as simple as walk away, they get the house, the end, I'd probably consider it if I were crazy in debt.  Of course, I'd never be crazy in debt, so......

QUOTE
In many so-called recourse states, lenders can go after you for the difference between what the house eventually sells for and the amount owed. Lenders can seek a “deficiency judgment” against the borrower for that amount. It doesn’t happen that often these days, with lenders so bogged down with defaults, but it can. And new breeds of servicing firms   are springing up to collect this debt.

I wonder how many states allow for that?  Or if lenders would even bother considering how much more legal cost that is to them.

Guess they shouldn't have written all those crappy mortgages.

I wonder how long the bank has to file against you. They may have a couple years. So I'm not sure it wouldn't be in the banks interest. I know of a home here that a friend of mine walked away from several years ago. He owed 112,000. The house sold for 42,000. More than enough difference to pay a lawyer.
My work has been slow so we tried to refinance under the gov. program. We were late 2 times last year so we don't qualify. To me it was like WTF we are making the payments could just use a break by lower interest. They claim we have to stay with the same bank to use the gov. program. We have looked into just going to a bank that will deal. When the wife looked into it what I consider predatory lender came out of the woodwork calling. We will work things out and keep the house but the gov. hasn't done anything for me.


--------------
In marriage there is always one person right. And the other one is the husband.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
4 replies since Mar. 02 2010,12:08 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


 
reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply The latest trend in home ownership
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code