Search Members Help

» Welcome Guest
[ Log In :: Register ]

 

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]

 reply to topic new topic new poll
Topic: Government Employment< Next Oldest | Next Newest >
 Post Number: 1
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 07 2014,16:04  Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Let's do another "don't look it up" poll.

What percent of the workforce do you think works for the federal government?  Civilian jobs only (no military)

No cheating, Malcolm.

And, bonus question.  Is it more or less than at each of the following decades? (answer per decade): 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000.

Edited: to clarify for federal only.

Edited by TheCatt on Nov. 08 2014,06:31

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 2
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 07 2014,16:13 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
All levels of government?  I would guess.... 15-20%, and we've got to have more now than ever before.

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 3
Malcolm Search for posts by this member.
I disagree.
Avatar



Group: Privateers
Posts: 27168
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 07 2014,16:56 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
I'll go 1 of every 10 people.

50s: way more than this, gov't wasn't big enough
60s: way more than this, still not big enough
70s: getting closer, lots of new workers needed for idealistic hippie initiatives
80s: getting closer still, due to massive military buildup
90s: somewhere close to now, because we still had cash and no commies to outspend
00s: more workers then than now, because we had seven million bloated "wars" on various abstract concepts and common sense in general AND the cash to fuel them

I presume the economic situation in the past ten years has necessitated a bit of shrinkage.

--------------
Diogenes of Sinope:

"It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours."

"Other dogs bite only their enemies, whereas I bite also my friends in order to save them."

Arnold Judas Rimmer, BSC, SSC:

"Better dead than smeg."
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 4
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 07 2014,17:05 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 5
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 07 2014,19:53 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(TheCatt @ Nov. 07 2014,20:05)
QUOTE
Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.

Including postal employees?  I say 10%.

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 6
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,04:05 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(GORDON @ Nov. 07 2014,22:53)
QUOTE

(TheCatt @ Nov. 07 2014,20:05)
QUOTE
Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.

Including postal employees?  I say 10%.

From what I can tell, yes, USPS employees count as federal employees.

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 7
thibodeaux Search for posts by this member.
RAG
Avatar



Group: Privateers
Posts: 6494
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,04:49 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
What about military? (I'd say yes, active duty only, no reserves or guard)
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 8
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,06:30 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(thibodeaux @ Nov. 08 2014,07:49)
QUOTE
What about military? (I'd say yes, active duty only, no reserves or guard)

Civilian only.

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 9
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,07:10 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(TheCatt @ Nov. 08 2014,07:05)
QUOTE

(GORDON @ Nov. 07 2014,22:53)
QUOTE

(TheCatt @ Nov. 07 2014,20:05)
QUOTE
Ack. I should have clarified: FEDERAL government only.

Including postal employees?  I say 10%.

From what I can tell, yes, USPS employees count as federal employees.

There are those who argue that USPS workers don't count, because their budget is somehow not tied to the federal budget (and that is why you can't use the USPS as an example of how the government can bring in record amounts of tax money but can't keep post offices open).

I don't make those arguments, but some do.

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 10
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,07:13 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
At any rate... I think I would have guessed 5-10%, and probably higher than any decade except the 90s and 2000s.

Lowest since 1962 in absolute terms.




Lowest since WWII in % terms, around 2% of workers.


Local and state government, however, growing massively:

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 11
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,07:25 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
So, more people overall, but fewer as a percentage of total population?

And why don't military count?  Their checks come from the treasury.

Edited by GORDON on Nov. 08 2014,07:26

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 12
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,07:55 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(GORDON @ Nov. 08 2014,10:25)
QUOTE
So, more people overall, but fewer as a percentage of total population?

And why don't military count?  Their checks come from the treasury.

Fewest people overall since 1962.

Cuz those aren't the #s aren't included in what the WSJ was counting.

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 13
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,08:48 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
What the hell were all these federal employees doing in 1962?  There was no department of education, NSA, homeland security, etc.

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 14
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,08:52 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(GORDON @ Nov. 08 2014,11:48)
QUOTE
What the hell were all these federal employees doing in 1962?  There was no department of education, NSA, homeland security, etc.

Maybe things like the IRS that have been computerized?

Also, this count does not include federal contractors.  So the #s may be misleading.

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 15
GORDON Search for posts by this member.
90%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 36125
Joined: Jun. 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,09:01 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Hmmm.

--------------
I don't give a fuck!
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 16
thibodeaux Search for posts by this member.
RAG
Avatar



Group: Privateers
Posts: 6494
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,12:27 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE

(TheCatt @ Nov. 08 2014,11:52)
QUOTE
Also, this count does not include federal contractors.  So the #s may be misleading.

My first guess is shenanigans with counting. Like, the janitor in the federal building in 1962 was probably a federal employee, but now he's an employee of a contractor.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 17
TheCatt Search for posts by this member.
Top 2%
Avatar



Group: Super Administrators
Posts: 22951
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 08 2014,12:58 Skip to the previous post in this topic. Skip to the next post in this topic. Ignore posts   QUOTE
Here's an estimate around 11 million.

QUOTE
When he added up all the numbers, he found that the true size of the federal government was about 11 million: 1.8 million civil servants, 870,000 postal workers, 1.4 million military personnel, 4.4 million contractors, and 2.5 million grantees

Including active duty military.

--------------
It's not me, it's someone else.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
 Post Number: 18
Vince Search for posts by this member.
I make sweet, sweet love to my legally licenced copy of Microsoft Vista.
Avatar



Group: Privateers
Posts: 5016
Joined: May 2004
PostIcon Posted on: Nov. 09 2014,13:49 Skip to the previous post in this topic.  Ignore posts   QUOTE
Part of the rise in local government jobs is in part due to federal regulations from my understanding.  Some the feds help pay for, but they're still federally created jobs, even if they're being shouldered by the local government.
Offline
Top of Page Profile Contact Info 
17 replies since Nov. 07 2014,16:04 < Next Oldest | Next Newest >

[ Track This Topic :: Email This Topic :: Print this topic ]


  		reply to topic new topic new poll

» Quick Reply Government Employment
iB Code Buttons
You are posting as:

Do you wish to enable your signature for this post?
Do you wish to enable emoticons for this post?
Track this topic
View All Emoticons
View iB Code